What feat did Sotnikov accomplish in Vasil Bykov’s visit and received the best answer
Reply from SHAMELESS[guru]
On the first pages of the story, we are presented with two fighters from one of the partisan detachments - Sotnikov and Rybak, who set off on a mission on a frosty, windy night. They are tasked with obtaining food for their tired, exhausted comrades at all costs. But we see that the fighters are in an unequal position: Sotnikov goes on a mission with a severe cold. And to Rybak’s question why he didn’t refuse to go if he was sick, he answers: “That’s why he didn’t refuse because others refused.” These words of Sotnikov tell us about his highly developed sense of duty, consciousness, courage, and endurance.
As the story progresses, we see that the main characters are haunted by one failure after another. Firstly, the farm where they hoped to get food was burned down. Secondly, Sotnikov was wounded in a shootout with the enemy. This detail is interesting - the author accompanies external action with internal action. This is especially noticeable in the development of the image of the Fisherman. At first, Rybak is a little dissatisfied with Sotnikov, his illness, which does not allow them to move fast enough. This slight discontent is replaced either by pity and sympathy, or by involuntary irritation. But Bykov shows the completely worthy behavior of Rybak, who helps Sotnikov carry the weapon, and does not leave him alone when he cannot walk due to injury.
By nature, Rybak is by no means a traitor, much less a disguised enemy, but a normal person with his own merits and demerits. The fisherman is a strong and reliable guy, in whom there lives a feeling of brotherhood, camaraderie, and mutual assistance. But this is how it is in a normal combat situation. Left alone with the wounded Sotnikov, choking from coughing, among the snowdrifts, without food and in constant anxiety of being captured by the Nazis, Rybak breaks down. And when he is captured, a breakdown occurs in his soul. He wants to live. The fighter does not want to betray his homeland, he is trying to find a way out of the situation in which he finds himself. His conversation with Sotnikov after the interrogation is noteworthy:
“Listen,” Rybak whispered hotly after a pause. - We need to pretend to be humble. You know, they offered me to join the police,” Rybak said, somehow without meaning to. Sotnikov’s eyelids trembled, his eyes sparkled with hidden, anxious attention. - That's how it is! So what, will you run? - I won’t run, don’t be afraid. I'll bargain with them. “Look, you’ll bargain,” Sotnikov hissed sarcastically.”
The fisherman agrees to serve as a policeman. He hopes to take advantage of this to escape to his own people. But Sotnikov was not mistaken, foreseeing that the powerful Hitler machine would destroy Rybak, that the cunning would turn into betrayal.
The ending of the story is very tragic: a former partisan, on the orders of the Nazis, executes his former squad comrade. After this, the life of the Fisherman, previously like this
dear to him, suddenly loses its meaning, turns out to be so unbearable that he thinks about suicide. But he fails to do this either, since the police took his belt off. This is “the insidious fate of a man lost in war,” writes the author.
Reply from 3 answers[guru]
The story "Sotnikov" was written in 1970. Real heroes the stories never existed in reality, but the incident that formed the basis of this work occurred in real life.
This happened in August 1944, when our troops broke through the defenses and surrounded the Germans. Among the prisoners was a man who had long been considered dead. Unable to withstand the terrible tests, he committed betrayal, he did it deliberately. It seemed to him that this was only for a while, that at a convenient moment he would return to his people. But fate did not present him with such an opportunity. This is probably why it is a betrayal, so that there is no justification for it. Vasil Bykov recognized this man, and then wrote a story about him, in which he puts moral issues about the meaning of life, about the spiritual strength of a person who finds himself in a hopeless situation. The heroes are faced with a choice - to die with dignity or to survive vilely.
Already at the very beginning of the story, a gulf is revealed between the heroes of the story. The fisherman cannot understand why the sick Sotnikov is going on a mission, because he had the opportunity to refuse. And “that’s why I didn’t refuse because others refused.” This is what the Fisherman cannot understand; he cannot understand this, because he does not have that sense of duty that is so necessary in war.
The exhausted Sotnikov is contrasted with the energetic and decisive nature of Rybak. But how did it happen that Rybak became a traitor? Bykov takes the reader along the entire path of Rybak’s moral quest. His choice is the result of progress towards betrayal. Once captured, it experiences a panicky fear of death. Can we blame him for having hope of survival until the last moment? After all, he did not want to be a traitor, he did not want to betray his comrades, but was only trying to deceive the Germans. However, he betrayed, without noticing it, and ended up in the police camp. Nothing made him stop before betrayal: neither the life of Peter, nor Demchikha, who left behind children. For the sake of his own salvation, he is ready to sacrifice everything. The fisherman seeks profit even in the death of a friend with whom he has gone through so much. The execution of Sotnikov becomes the last stage on the path of betrayal. Until the last moment, Sotnikov cannot believe in Rybak’s betrayal. “Of course, out of fear and hatred, people are capable of any betrayal, but Rybak, it seems, was not a traitor, just as he was not a coward. He had many opportunities to run over to the police, and there were plenty of opportunities to become cowardly, but he behaved with dignity. At least not worse than others." And in a shootout with the police, Rybak does not leave his friend; something forced him to return to the wounded Sotnikov. But this is probably too little to preserve human dignity and to walk the path of life with dignity.
In this story we see not only a traitor, but also a person whose name, selfless feeling and courage cannot leave readers indifferent. If Rybak was only concerned about how to save his own skin, then Sotnikov is thinking about “meeting his death, whatever it may be... with soldier’s dignity - this became the main goal of his last minutes.” Not only Rybak wants to live, but also Sotnikov, but for him there are more high values: civic duty, human dignity. Finding himself in the face of death, Sotnikov wants to save the people doomed to death with him, trying to take all the blame on himself. This state of the hero is accurately reflected in the title feature film based on this story. “Ascent” - that’s what director L. Shepitko called this film. And indeed, Sotnikov ascends to moral heights. His actions are a path, an ascent to achievement.
It is quite difficult to predict the outcome of the story from the very beginning. Sometimes it seems that Rybak is worthy of more sympathy than Sotnikov. But gradually, in the unfolding events, we see how their characters are revealed in the actions of the heroes. Fisherman's betrayal evokes hatred and contempt. Sotnikov’s feat gives rise to admiration and pride in the heart.
In the story “Sotnikov,” Vasil Bykov gives us a lesson in humanity, teaches us to be true to ourselves, to our conscience, even in the most difficult and complex situations in life. The story of Sotnikov and Rybak is a story about what relaxation in fundamental issues, the absence of important moral principles in relationships with the outside world. This is the writer's harsh and honest reflection on life choice every person. The situation of war only exposes this more acutely eternal problem: how a person should live his life. Thanks to the writer for his lesson.
A MAN'S FEAT IN WAR (BASED ON THE STORY "SOTNIKOV" BY V. BYKOV)
1.Introduction.
The moral choice of a person in war.
2. Main part.
2.1 Scouts Sotnikov and Rybak.
2.2.The main choice has been made.
3. Conclusion.
Prize for writer Bykov. During the war years, we taught History and ourselves a great lesson in human dignity.
Problem moral choice man in the face of terrible trials is most clearly revealed in works of literature, dedicated to events Great Patriotic War. Where, if not in the face of death, can a person open up, show everything that he is capable of and what he values in life. In the story Belarusian writer Vasil Bykov "Sotnikov" the author reflects on true and false heroism. It is not enemies who clash, but people fighting on the same side. Perhaps under normal conditions they would not have appeared true characters these heroes. Scouts Sotnikov and Rybak go on a combat mission and react differently to the upcoming danger. At first glance, it seems that the physically strong and quick-witted Rybak is much more ready for a feat than the frail and weak Sotnikov. But even then, when there was no danger yet nearby, Rybak was already internally ready to commit betrayal. Before us is a man who all his life “managed to find some way out.” This gap was clearly felt by the German investigator, who offered the hero to serve Germany. German policemen discover Russian intelligence officers at the village woman who sheltered them. Once captured and interrogated, the heroes behave differently. Sotnikov takes all the blame upon himself, defending the woman who hid them and her daughter, who were also captured by the police. For this he is subjected brutal torture German executioner. At first, the fisherman is also determined to hold out until the last, but when he sees his wounded comrade returning from interrogation, he feels a desperate desire to survive at all costs. Remembering that during the first interrogation, the investigator hinted at serving in the police, Rybak, apparently, had already made his choice at that moment. When the Germans, having not obtained any information either through interrogation or torture, announce to the prisoners about the upcoming execution, the heroes again show their character in different ways. This news makes the fisherman feverishly search
the way to save his life pushes him to betrayal. He convinces himself that he is not a traitor, that he will run away. Sotnikov comes to terms with the thought of death, but tries to convince the Germans that he is the only partisan, and the rest of the people have nothing to do with him. IN last minutes In his life, Sotnikov lost confidence in his right to demand from people the same as from himself. Even despising Rybak for betraying the Motherland, Sotnikov realizes that he has no right to condemn a person for his endless desire to live. The hero understands that Fisherman has always been weaker than himself. Sotnikov leaves this life as a completely different person, having become wiser and more forgiving of the weaknesses of others. He himself remains true to himself and his duty until his last breath: “Well, it was necessary to muster the last strength within himself in order to face death with dignity... Otherwise, why would there be life? It is too difficult for a person to be careless about its end.” Sotnikov’s enormous moral strength helps him not to break down by accepting suffering. Sotnikov is an image that instills strength of spirit in us, becomes an example that we want to follow. Bykov reflects not only on life and death, on human duty and betrayal. The writer is trying to give psychological analysis actions, thoughts, words of their heroes. It is easy to condemn Rybak, and he certainly deserves to be condemned. But Bykov tried not only to analyze the actions of this man, but also to understand and explain them. 3a story “Sotnikov” Bykov was awarded a special prize of the Catholic Church, which preaches understanding and forgiveness. A work that teaches a person to think and empathize could not be ignored
V. Bykov - the story “Sotnikov”. The theme of mental fortitude and betrayal, the expansion of the concept of “heroism” are characteristic of V. Bykov’s story “Sotnikov”. There are no grandiose tank battles or scenes of impressive battles in the work. The writer gives all his attention inner world man at war. Let's remember the plot of the story. On a winter night, two partisans, Rybak and Sotnikov, set off on a journey. They must get food for their squad. Their path turns out to be very dangerous, since there are no villages in the area that are free from police posts. Finally they manage to get a lamb carcass, but then the police discover them. The partisans fire back, trying to break away from pursuit, but due to Sotnikov’s wound they end up with the Germans. And here their paths diverge: Sotnikov chooses death, and Rybak chooses betrayal, thanks to which his life is spared. Analyzing Rybak’s behavior, the author notes: “The opportunity to live has appeared - this is the main thing. Everything else will come later.” What are the reasons for Fisherman’s betrayal? The writer himself reflected on this: “I think that the reason for the fall of Rybak is in his spiritual omnivorousness, lack of formation... Moral deafness does not allow him to understand the deafness of the fall. Only in the end, with irreparable delay, does he discover that in other cases surviving is no better than dying... The result is spiritual death, which turns out to be worse and more shameful than physical death” (V. Bykov).
Searched here:
- the betrayal of the fisherman in the work of centurions
- centurions' betrayal
- centurion's betrayal of the fisherman
Almost all of Vasil Bykov’s works tell about the Great Patriotic War. This is largely due to the fact that the writer himself went through it from beginning to end. He views the events of the war primarily from a moral and philosophical point of view. Describing the behavior of people in inhumane conditions, Bykov makes us think about the origins inner strength, which is inherent in the best of his heroes. In the story “Sotnikov,” the writer convincingly shows that this power practically does not depend on a person’s physical capabilities and belongs entirely to the realm of the spirit.
In the images of the main characters of the work, it seems to me, the features of two opposing personality types are embodied. Finding themselves in a situation of moral choice, such people behave differently: some commit betrayal in exchange for their miserable life; others show fortitude and courage, preferring to die with a clear conscience. Thus, in Vasil Bykov’s story, two partisans are contrasted - Rybak and Sotnikov.
At first, Rybak seems to us to be a completely sincere person: he helps his sick comrade, shares his last grain with him, and does not get angry because of an unexpected burden. In his own way, Rybak is kind. He was never able to kill the headman, although he believed that it was necessary to do so.
Fear for his life first manifests itself in Rybak during a chase organized by the police: at first he wanted to leave Sotnikov, justifying himself by saying that he still couldn’t get out. “But what will he say in the forest? “It seems to me that it was this question that forced Rybak to return to his comrade. At that moment, it was still important to him what others would think of him.
When they were discovered in Demchikha’s attic, Rybak “wanted Sotnikov to be the first to rise.” But he had no strength, he continued to lie. And Rybak stood up first.
During interrogation, fearful of torture, Rybak answered the truth, that is, he betrayed the detachment. When he was offered to serve Germany, “he suddenly clearly felt freedom.” Rybak not only agreed to join the police, but also helped hang Sotnikov in order to confirm to his enemies his willingness to serve them. He thought only about freedom, hoped that he would escape, but after the execution he realized “that the escape was over, that with this liquidation he was tied more securely than with a belt chain. And although they were left alive, in some respects they were also liquidated.”
Thinking about everything that happened, Rybak “couldn’t really understand how it happened and who was to blame for it... I really didn’t want to find myself to blame.” He justified himself by saying that he was fighting for his life, that “it was Sotnikov who was more to blame for his misfortune than others... he no longer cares about everything in the noose on the arch, but what does it feel like for him, alive!..”. The fisherman does not notice that his feverish attempts to whitewash himself are cowardly and illogical. At the end of the work, the author will say that what happened to this hero is “the insidious fate of a man lost in war.”
Sotnikov’s path appears differently. From the very beginning we recognize in him a proud and stubborn person. He went on the mission because “others refused.” The inopportunely occurring cold seemed like a trifle to Sotnikov, although from the further narration it becomes clear that he was seriously ill. However, Sotnikov refused the food and medicine offered to him by the headman’s wife, because “he did not wish this aunt well and ... could not agree to her sympathy and help.” Remembering how the same simple woman had once betrayed him to the police, he was suspicious of the kindness shown to him in the headman’s house.
Feeling the approach of the policemen, Sotnikov thought that “... while he was alive, he would not let them near him.” This man was not afraid of death, he was only “afraid of becoming a burden to others.” And he was also “afraid that he might lose consciousness, and then the worst thing that he feared most in this war would happen.” Sotnikov decided not to surrender alive. He “attributed the fact that Rybak returned... to ordinary soldier mutual assistance,” but “he would not have had anything against Rybak’s help if it had been addressed to someone else.” He himself never wanted any support; it was “contrary to his whole being.”
During the interrogation, Sotnikov first of all tried to save Demchikha, who suffered because of him and Rybak, and before the execution he unsuccessfully tried to take all the blame on himself. He spent the last efforts of his life to meet death “with the dignity of a soldier.”
Sotnikov was a man who, under no circumstances, made a deal with his conscience, and he passed away with the consciousness that he had not stained his soul in any way. To the last hero tried to help people who, as he believed, were in trouble because of him.
So, we have two completely opposite characters. To better reveal them, the author often uses internal monologues heroes through whom, for example, Rybak’s hesitations at the moment of persecution, Sotnikov’s thoughts as he goes to execution are conveyed.
When characterizing the characters, Bykov also uses episodes from their childhood. We learn that Sotnikov, as a child, swore an oath to himself never to lie. I think that my father played a big role in the formation of this personality. It was he who brought up honesty, straightforwardness and perseverance in his son.
The story by Vasil Bykov tells about events that took place more than sixty years ago. However, for us, readers of the 21st century, it is interesting not only from a historical point of view. After all, problems of honesty, conscience, justice and humanism also face our generation. What should I do? What should we be? How to preserve the human in you? Book by Vasil Bykov"Sotnikov" helps us answer these difficult questions.
