There is irrefutable evidence that giant people lived on Earth. Archaeological finds from different years found all over the world confirm this fact.
Historical chronicles of the 19th century often report the discovery of skeletons of abnormally tall people in different parts of the globe.
In 1821, in the US state of Tennessee, the ruins of an ancient stone wall, and under it are two human skeletons 215 centimeters tall. In Wisconsin, during the construction of a granary in 1879, huge vertebrae and skull bones were found “of incredible thickness and size,” according to a newspaper article.
In 1883, several burial mounds were discovered in Utah containing the burials of very tall people - 195 centimeters, which is at least 30 centimeters higher than the average height of Aboriginal Indians. The latter did not make these burials and could not provide any information about them. In 1885, in Gasterville (Pennsylvania), a stone crypt was discovered in a large burial mound, in which there was a skeleton 215 centimeters high. Primitive images of people, birds and animals were carved on the walls of the crypt. 
In 1890, in Egypt, archaeologists found a stone sarcophagus with a clay coffin inside, which contained the mummies of a two-meter red-haired woman and a baby. The facial features and build of the mummies were sharply different from the ancient Egyptians. Similar mummies of a man and a woman with red hair were discovered in 1912 in Lovelock (Nevada) in a cave carved into the rock. The height of the mummified woman during life was two meters, and the man was about three meters.
Australian finds
In 1930, near Basarst in Australia, prospectors mining jasper often found fossilized imprints of huge human feet. Anthropologists called the race of giant people, whose remains were found in Australia, megantropus. The height of these people ranged from 210 to 365 centimeters. Megantropus are similar to Gigantopithecus, the remains of which were discovered in China. Judging by the found fragments of jaws and many teeth, the height of the Chinese giants was 3 to 3.5 meters, and their weight was 400 kilograms. Near Basarst, in river sediments, there were stone artifacts of enormous weight and size - clubs , plows, chisels, knives and axes. Modern Homo sapiens would hardly be able to work with tools weighing from 4 to 9 kilograms.
An anthropological expedition that specifically explored this area in 1985 for the presence of remains of Meganthropus, carried out excavations at a depth of up to three meters from the surface of the earth. Australian researchers found, among other things, a fossilized molar tooth 67 millimeters high and 42 millimeters wide. The owner of the tooth had to be at least 7.5 meters tall and weigh 370 kilograms! Hydrocarbon analysis determined the age of the finds to be nine million years. 
In 1971, in Queensland, farmer Stephen Walker, while plowing his field, came across a large fragment of a jaw with teeth five centimeters high. In 1979, in Megalong Valley in the Blue Mountains, local residents found a huge stone sticking out above the surface of a stream, on which could be seen the imprint of part of a huge foot with five toes. The transverse size of the fingers was 17 centimeters. If the print had been preserved in its entirety, it would have been 60 centimeters long. It follows that the print was left by a man six meters tall. Three huge footprints, 60 centimeters long and 17 centimeters wide, were found near Malgoa. The giant's stride length was measured at 130 centimeters. The footprints were preserved in fossilized lava for millions of years, even before Homo sapiens appeared on the Australian continent (if the theory of evolution is correct). Huge footprints are also found in the limestone bed of the Upper Macleay River. The fingerprints of these footprints are 10 centimeters long and the width of the foot is 25 centimeters. Obviously, the Aborigines of Australia were not the first inhabitants of the continent. Interestingly, their folklore contains legends about giant people who once lived in these territories.
Other evidence of giants
In one of the old books entitled History and Antiquity, now kept in the library of Oxford University, there is an account of the discovery of a gigantic skeleton made in the Middle Ages in Cumberland. “The giant is buried four yards deep in the ground and is in full military garb. His sword and battle ax rest next to him. The skeleton is 4.5 yards (4 meters) long and the teeth " big man"measures 6.5 inches (17 centimeters)"
In 1877, near Ewreka, Nevada, prospectors were panning for gold in a deserted hilly area. One of the workers accidentally noticed something sticking out over the cliff ledge. People climbed the rock and were surprised to find human bones of the foot and lower leg along with the kneecap. The bone was immured in the rock, and the miners used picks to free it from the rock. Assessing the unusualness of the find, the workers brought it to Evreka. The stone in which the rest of the leg was embedded was quartzite, and the bones themselves turned black, which indicated their considerable age. The leg was broken above the knee and consisted of the knee joint and completely preserved bones of the lower leg and foot. Several doctors examined the bones and concluded that the leg undoubtedly belonged to a person. But the most intriguing aspect of the find was the size of the leg - 97 centimeters from knee to foot. The owner of this limb during his lifetime had a height of 3 meters 60 centimeters.
Even more mysterious was the age of the quartzite in which the fossil was found - 185 million years, the era of dinosaurs. Local newspapers vied with each other to report the sensation. One of the museums sent researchers to the site in hopes of finding the remaining parts of the skeleton. But, unfortunately, nothing more was discovered.
In 1936, German paleontologist and anthropologist Larson Kohl found the skeletons of giant people on the shores of Lake Elizi in Central Africa. The 12 men buried in the mass grave had heights from 350 to 375 centimeters during their lifetime. It is curious that their skulls had sloping chins and two rows of upper and lower teeth.
There is evidence that during the Second World War in Poland, during the burial of those executed, a fossilized skull 55 centimeters high was found, that is, almost three times larger than that of a modern adult. The giant to whom the skull belonged had very proportional features and a height of at least 3.5 meters
Giant Skulls
Ivan T. Sanderson, a famous zoologist and frequent guest on the American Tonight show, popular in the 60s, once shared with the public interesting story about a letter he received from a certain Alan McShir. The author of the letter in 1950 worked as a bulldozer operator on the construction of a road in Alaska. He reported that workers discovered two huge fossilized skulls, vertebrae and leg bones in one of the burial mounds. The height of the skulls reached 58 cm and the width 30 centimeters. The ancient giants had a double row of teeth and disproportionately flat heads. Each skull had a neat round hole in the upper part. It should be noted that the custom of deforming the skulls of infants in order to force their heads to acquire an elongated shape as they grew, existed among some Indian tribes of North America. The vertebrae, like the skulls, were three times larger than modern man. The length of the shin bones ranged from 150 to 180 centimeters. 
In South Africa, in diamond mining in 1950, a fragment of a huge skull 45 centimeters high was discovered. Above the brow ridges were two strange protrusions resembling small horns. Anthropologists who came into possession of the find determined the age of the skull - about nine million years.
There is reliable evidence of the discovery of huge skulls in Southeast Asia and the islands of Oceania.
At the beginning of the 16th century, one discovery made the entire French kingdom talk about itself: a complete skeleton of a man of gigantic stature who lived in a very specific era was found. This was the king of the Cimbri, one of the two tribes that attacked Gaul and was defeated by the Roman general Marius. Nicolas Habicot published in 1613 “A Dissertation on the Frame of the Giant Teutobochus, King of the Cimbri.” This skeleton was indeed impressive because it belonged to a man 25 feet tall. The discovery, which was considered genuine, was talked about for a long time, and the supposed skeleton of “Teutobochus” occupied its rightful place in the Natural History Museum for several generations. This was believed even in the 19th century, but Cuvier, approaching his research more carefully, discovered a cunning hoax. The famous skeleton, submitted in September 1842 for consideration to the Academy of Sciences, turned out to be composed of real fossil bones, but these were not human bones at all: these were the bones of ... a mastodon, that is, a type of prehistoric giant elephant that disappeared even before the appearance of mammoths. This means that the clever “handicraftsman” simply figured out how to give the bones a “standing” position so that the skeleton’s height and posture resembled that of a human being. 
It is also usually noted that the presence of giant monuments does not at all speak in favor of the actual existence of giants. Pyramids and megaliths are, of course, impressive, but there is no reason to claim that their creators were of gigantic stature. In the end, cathedral in Strasbourg - also a huge building, but nevertheless, it was built by people of quite normal sizes, they just owned perfect technology.
And yet there are some very intriguing archaeological discoveries. Archaeologist Burkhalter, during excavations in Moravia, discovered a stone tool whose dimensions exceeded three by four meters and weighed three or four pounds! This, quite obviously, was a used tool, and not at all a symbolic item of household utensils; it is clear that the presence of a votive ax would prove the existence of giants not in to a greater extent than the discovery of huge statues in an ancient temple. But there is much better evidence: an entire city was found in Tiaguanaco, built for people whose normal height was gigantic - three or four meters.
Let us give the floor to our friend Marcel Moreau: “Humanity keeps in its atavistic memory the memories of these giants of the highest intelligence, descended from the gods, giants who guided and taught people. Humanity remembers a paradise lost from the very beginning, an initial high initiation followed by a fall.”
Chapter 2
"Average eyes."
Paths of human migration around the globe
In the previous chapter I emphasized that human races can be studied using ophthalmogeometry.
The question of the origin of human races is very interesting. And in fact, why are people living in different parts of our planet different from each other? Are there patterns of variability in people's appearance depending on what region of the globe they live in? Where is the center of human origin? From whom did we come?
Many scientists have tried to find answers to these questions. Some of them proved the divine origin of man (idealists), others - the origin of monkeys (materialist Darwinists). Among the second group of scientists there were those who said that different races of people originated from different types monkeys
There are many classifications of human races. The French scientist Cuvier identified, in particular, 3 races - white, black and yellow. Deniker (1902) believed that there are 29 human races on earth. The Encyclopædia Britannica (1986) describes 16 human races. But the most complete and fundamental classification was, in my opinion, made by our Soviet scientist A. Yarkho (1935, 1936), who described 35 human races, and also accompanied his work with beautiful photographs and drawings of representatives of different races. Having started the study of human races, we made high-quality photocopies of representatives of all 35 races from A. Yarho’s book and cut out the eye area of the face from these copies. Next, using a scanner, we entered these images into the computer and carried out their ophthalmo-geometric analysis. Ophthalmogeometric differences of different human races were traced quite clearly. But is it possible to find any mathematical patterns among them?
"Average eyes"
Trying to answer the question posed, we calculated the “average eyes” among all human races.
Fortunately, the corneal constant allowed us to calculate Ophthalmogeometric parameters in absolute numbers.
When we finished the calculations, we were amazed. The “average eyes” clearly belonged to the Tibetan race! - Is Nicholas Roerich really right?! - I exclaimed. Since childhood, I have revered N. Roerich and considered him an idol of Russian science. In 1925-1935, he made several Tibetan and Himalayan expeditions, the result of which was the assumption that humanity arose in Tibet and from there spread across the globe. N. Roerich showed this by analyzing historical and religious facts.
In our mathematical analysis of the eyes of different races of the world, the average statistical ophthalmogeometric indicators again fell on the Tibetan race. Is this a coincidence? Are there any direct analogies here?
While discussing this topic, we tried to classify the eyes of different races of the world according to the degree of mathematical approximation to the “average eyes”. At first we didn’t succeed: ophthalmogeometric parameters of different races of the world
did not line up in one orderly line. We succeeded only when we began to distribute the eyes of different races into four roots from the “average eyes” of the Tibetan race.
"Average eyes"
In other words, 4 races had approximately the same degree of mathematical approximation to the eyes of the Tibetan race: Paleo-Siberian, South Asian, Pamir and Armenoid races.
Unlike the first three races, the Armenoid race had a lesser degree of mathematical approximation to the Tibetan race, but without placing it next to the Tibetan race, the system of distributing the races of the world according to the degree of mathematical approximation of the eyes to the “average eyes” would not be possible.
So, having identified 4 roots, we were able to distribute human races in all these roots according to the degree of mathematical approximation to the “average eyes”. A coherent system has emerged.
Next, we placed photographs of the human races on the world map in the places where they historically lived, and connected them with lines in accordance with the mathematical approximation of the eyes along the four above roots. This is how an ophthalmogeometric diagram of human migration across the globe was obtained.
Paths of human migration around the globe
Thus, according to the data of ophthalmogeometry (and this is a dry mathematical analysis of the races of the world!) it turned out that humanity arose in Tibet and spread from there across the globe in four main directions:
- path A: Siberia - America - New Zealand;
- path B: Thailand - Indonesia - Australia;
- route C: Pamir - Africa;
- path D: Caucasus - Europe - Iceland.
In each of these migration paths of humanity from Tibet, a clear dynamics of variability in the ophthalmogeometric parameters of the eyes of human races was traced, compiled according to the principle of the degree of mathematical approximation of these parameters to the “average eyes” of the Tibetan race. That is, in each of these migration routes, representatives of the human races were located in such a way that the neighboring two races had the maximum degree of mathematical approximation of ophthalmogeometric parameters to each other, and the degree of mathematical approximation to the eyes of the Tibetan race decreased with distance from Tibet.
Now let's look at each of the resulting migration routes in more detail and compare them with some historical facts.
Migration path A
It turned out that at this very big way(Siberia, America, New Zealand) the following races entered after the Tibetan: Paleo-Siberian, Ural-Altai, Laponoid, Baltic, South Siberian, Central Asian, Eskimo, Manchu-Korean, Atlantic, South American, Paleo-American, Patagonian, Pacific, Central American and Polynesian.
PATH A
A1 - paleosiberian
A2 - Ural-Altai
A2/1 - laponoid
A2/2 - Baltic
A3- South Siberian
AZ/1 - Central Asian
AZ/2 - Eskimo
AZ/3 - Manchu-Korean
A4 - Atlantic
A5 - South American
A6 - Paleoamerican
A7" - Patagonian
A7/1 - Pacific
A8 - Central American
A9 - Polynesian
Moreover, several branches extend from the main line of eye variability: from the Ural-Altai race - the laponoid and Baltic races (one after the other according to the principle of eye variability), from the South Siberian race - the Central Asian, Eskimo and Manchu-Korean races (separately from each other) and from Patagonian race - Pacific race.
I am not a historian, and it is difficult for me to accurately judge which modern nations and nationalities are part of a particular Human Race. I am just a professor of eye surgery and it was only by the will of scientific logic that I was forced to touch upon such a non-specific area for me.
.PATH A
PATH A (continued)
Nevertheless, I will allow myself to briefly describe this and other routes of human migration from Tibet, obtained by ophthalmic geometries.
in a rictical way. Let historians not consider the errors that I will probably make as a great sin.
Within the designated route A, humanity migrated from Tibet to the north. New living conditions left their mark on the appearance and, in particular, on the eye area of the face (Paleo-Siberian race). From the Paleo-Siberian race, the Ural-Altai race emerged, represented in modern times, as I think, by the Altaians and Bashkirs.
The Ural-Altai race became the ancestor of the blind western branch, which successively included the laponoid (Lapps) and Baltic races. Representatives of the latter are, in my opinion, Finns. I also do not rule out that the Baltic race (possibly together with the Laponoid) became the ancestor of the modern Tatars, whose eyes I studied. Estonians and Hungarians may be related to this same blind branch.
The next stage in the system of consistent ophthalmogeometric variability was the South Siberian race, which spread widely across the territory of Siberia and Kazakhstan. In my opinion, modern Kazakhs and many peoples of the North (Nenets, Yakuts, Chukchi, etc.) belong to this race. The South Siberian race gave rise to three independent blind branches: the Central Asian, Manchu-Korean and Eskimo races. Representatives of the Central Asian race are, apparently, modern Mongols. The Manchu-Korean race became the ancestor of modern northern Chinese, Japanese and Koreans. The blind branch of the Ekimos spread throughout Chukotka, Alaska, the northern coast of Canada and Greenland.
The South Siberian race, in addition, spread to the American continent, where it gradually transformed into the Atlantic race (North American Indians). With the further spread of humanity across the American continent from north to south, one race was replaced by another. From the Atlantean race, according to ophthalmogeometry, came the South American race, which, in my opinion, originated somewhere in North America, but without much mixing migrated to the south of the continent. From the South American race came the Paleo-American race, and from it the Patagonian race, which gave rise to a blind branch - the Pacific race. The Patagonian race gave, according to ophthalmogeometry, the Central American race, which, in my opinion, later migrated from the south of America to the region of Central America and now represents modern Mexicans (Mayans, Aztecs).
From the Central American race, according to the system of sequential eye names, the Polynesian race emerged. The latter, having built swimming facilities, was able to sail across the Pacific Ocean and reach distant New Zealand. How can one not recall Thor Heyerdahl, who proved the possibility of sailing across the Pacific Ocean on the reed boat “Ra”. So, the aborigines of New Zealand came (as it turns out according to ophthalmogeometry) not from nearby Australia, but from distant South America.
I also read that the Lo-Lo tribe from New Zealand reached Tibet. The circle has ended.
Does the ophthalmogeometric scheme match the historical data? Historians, as a rule, judge nations and nationalities based on the characteristics of language and culture. But this, it seems to me, is not enough. A language can be borrowed through close contact with another people, as, for example, the Russian language has become the predominant and even the only language for many small peoples of Russia (now you can meet representatives of the Chuvash, Mordovians, Komi and other peoples who speak only Russian and consider Russian native language). The culture of peoples also changes with close contact with other people. The question of races, peoples and nations is very complex and confusing. Nevertheless, we will try to draw some parallels.
In Moscow I found one Finn and one Japanese and invited them to participate together in a discussion about the origins of peoples. A tall, blond Finn and a small, dark-haired Japanese sat in armchairs and looked at each other with interest, probably thinking about where each of them came from.
“Gentlemen,” I said, starting the meeting, “after a thorough mathematical study of the eyes of the different races of the world, I was able to come to the conclusion that you, the Finn and the Japanese, have a single root of origin.” Please look at each other and try to find out if there is anything in common between you.
Finn and the Japanese looked at each other intently, apparently trying to find common features, and laughed in unison.
“There is nothing in common between us, maybe only that we are both people,” said the Japanese.
“Take your time, gentlemen,” I continued, “there were 4 roots of the origin of the different races of the world. You both have the same (first) root of origin. Look at the ophthalmogeometric map of human migration from Tibet: a single first root has several branches of human migration, one branch ends with you, the Finns (Baltic race), the other ends with you, the Japanese (Manchu-Korean race). But your root of origin is the same. Here, look! Therefore, you should find common signs, but very deep ones, because they are very ancient. Please name simple everyday words (fire, water, sky, earth, house, woman, etc.) in Japanese and Finnish - perhaps you will find similarities or a common root in them. In accordance with this, also try to draw parallels between the ancient (very ancient) customs of the Japanese and Finns.
An enthusiastic conversation ensued between the Finn and the Japanese in bad Russian language, which lasted two hours. At first I tried to write down Finnish and Japanese words that had a common root, as well as to grasp the meaning of the commonality of their ancient customs, but then I gave up because both interlocutors, excited by the conversation, did not pay decent attention to me and rarely stopped when I asked them to write down this or that word. Therefore, now, after several years, it is difficult for me to reproduce their conversation.
Look,” said the more lively Japanese, “in fact, the Finn and I have something in common.” We are brothers by ancient blood.
“By the way,” said the Finn, “you need to publicize your research more widely.” They will serve the cause of peace on Earth. And then everyone thinks that Aryan race is advanced. So the Japanese and I found that there are similarities between our languages, and there are similarities in customs. I looked at the Japanese as my blood brother, although he was not at all like me.
- Tell me, can you find similarities between me and a black man? - asked the Japanese.
“It’s unlikely, but between a Negro and a Pamiri it’s possible,” I answered.
Of course, I cannot vouch for the scientific rigor of the conversation between the Finn and the Japanese. However, the fact that they actually found a lot in common with each other is very interesting. Control studies (for example, a meeting between a Japanese and a nave who have different roots origin) unfortunately could not be carried out.
Other historical parallels that confirm the described path of human migration may be the hypothesis of the Asian origin of the American Indians, the hypothesis of American origin New Zealand aborigines and the fact of close contacts between the aborigines of Chukotka and Alaska.
Naturally, the subject of our research, which has its roots in ancient times, is controversial. Here, as in no other area, it is difficult to find direct evidence. But, despite this, I will continue to describe other routes of human migration obtained from ophthalmogeometric studies.
It turned out that after the Tibetan race, this southeastern migration route included the following successive races: South Asian, Papuan, Melanesian, Veddo-Indonesian and Australian. One branch departs from the main line of eye variability: the Papuan race gave rise to the Asian-pygmy race, which in turn gave birth to the Dravidian and Ainu races.
Migration path B
Within the designated route B, humanity migrated from Tibet to the southeast in ancient times. Natural conditions
habitats influenced the appearance of people, resulting in the appearance of the South Asian race, represented at present, in my opinion, by the Thais, Vietnamese, Kampucheans and South Chinese.
Spread to the southern islands (Philippines, Indonesia) led to the emergence of the Papuan race, which gave rise to the Asian-pygmy race within the same Indonesia.
According to our ideas, Papuans and pygmies are the height of human savagery. I have been to Indonesia, but I have not interacted with purebred pygmies and Papuans, so I cannot judge their mental abilities. Nobody knows what the Pygmies and Papuans were like in ancient times. Perhaps they were quite developed at that time, and regression and savagery among their people came later.
According to ophthalmogeometry, the branch of the Asian-pygmy race gave rise to two independent branches and gave birth to the Dravidian and Ainu races. The Dravidian race is represented, in my opinion, by the South Indians. While in India, I actually noticed that South Indians are noticeably different in appearance from North Indians: they are darker, their hair is curly, their eyes are completely different from those of North Indians. I think that the ancestor of the North Indians was the Tibetan race, and the South Indians, as I have already said, are representatives of the Dravidian race.
PATH B
81 - South Asian
82 - Papuan
B2/1 - Asian-pygmy
B2/2 - Dravidian
B2/3 - Ainu
VZ - Melanesian
B4 - Veddo-Indonesian
B5 - Australian
At one of the conferences in India, I asked an Indian doctor who had all the characteristics of the Dravidian race:
- Tell me, do you know where the South Indian tribes came from in ancient times?
“They say that my ancestors came to India from the islands of Polynesia,” the doctor answered.
“It coincided,” I stated.
At the same conference I found an Indian doctor who had all the characteristics of the Tibetan race.
Sorry,” I turned to him, “North Indians are different in appearance from South Indians. Do you think the South Indians came to India or have they always lived here?
“I don’t know for sure, but the South Indians seem to have come to Indian territory from somewhere a long time ago,” said the doctor, who had signs of the Tibetan race.
“Here you are,” I continued, “in appearance, you are a native representative of the North Indians. Did your ancestors also come to Indian territory from somewhere?
“We have always lived here,” the doctor answered.
“He’s really right,” I thought, “Tibet and northern India border each other.”
The above-mentioned Asian-pygmy race, according to ophthalmogeometry, also gave birth to the Ainu race. The Ainu currently live in northern Japan and are very different in appearance from other Japanese. When I was in Japan, I managed to find a native Japanese Aina and talk to him.
-Are you ain?
- No, I'm Japanese.
- I’m not asking about citizenship, but I’m talking about your ancestors. Are your ancestors Ainu?
-Yes.
- Don’t you remember what your people say about the origin of the Ainu? Where did they come to Japan from?
“In our people, already small in number, they say that our distant ancestors built ships and sailed here from distant Polynesia,” answered the Ainu, who was clearly different in appearance from other Japanese.
Again, I cannot vouch for the scientific rigor of the conversation conducted with a representative of the Ainu race, as well as the conversations with the South and North Indians. Information received from individuals is not yet the truth; they could have agreed. The final word should go to historians. But even these isolated coincidences are interesting in relation to coincidences with the ophthalmogeometric pattern of human migration from Tibet.
Migration route B ends in Australia. The eyes of Australian aborigines differ sharply from the eyes of New Zealand aborigines, but they are clearly included in the system of ophthalmogeometric variability in the migration path B, being the final stage in it. Therefore, if you believe the ophthalmogeometric scheme, the Australian aborigines came to Australia from the islands of Polynesia, but were unable to cross the strait and get to neighboring New Zealand. But the ancestors of the New Zealand aborigines were able to swim across the Pacific Ocean and reach the treasured islands, but they also could not spread to neighboring Australia.
Australia is a very ancient continent. Some scientists believe that Australia is the remaining part of the legendary Atlantis, and its unique flora and fauna have been preserved from the time of Atlantis. There are many indigenous tribes in Australia. Perhaps some of them came from the region of Polynesia (according to the ophthalmogeometric scheme), and some remained from the times of the ancient continent of Atlantis. But we will talk about this later.
Migration path C
According to the degree of mathematical approximation of the eyes, the following races entered this path after the Tibetan race: Pamir, Ethiopian, Negro, African-pygmeoid and Bushman. There is one branch from the Pamir race - the North Caucasian race.
This is the black branch of human migration from Tibet. It turns out that the progenitor of the black races (Ethiopian, Negro, African-pygmeoid and Bushman) is the Pamir race, which is currently represented, I think, by the Tajiks and other peoples of the Pamirs. From the same Pamir race came the North Caucasian race, represented in modern times by numerous Caucasian peoples.
Why did the blackening of people's skin occur along this migration route of humanity? The influence of the climatic factor cannot be excluded here, since changes in skin color also occurred in other migration routes. For example, in the migration route B, skin color changed from yellow (Tibetan race) to brown (Australian race), and in the branch branching off from the Papuan race, it reached almost black color (Dravidian race).
However, the clearly black color of the skin of the people of the African continent could also have a different genesis, due to the fact that, according to one hypothesis, humanity originated in parallel in Africa, where it was originally black. Perhaps there was a mixing of the Tibetan and African origins of humanity.
In addition, some literary sources indicate that the previous Atlantean civilization was divided into yellow and black people. Are African blacks descendants of the once powerful black Atlanteans? It is difficult for us to answer this question, but in subsequent chapters, when I will dwell on mysterious civilization Atlanteans, the reader will find my interesting reasoning and facts on this topic.
PATH C
C1 - Pamir
C1/1 - North Caucasian
C2 - Ethiopian
NW - Negro
C4 - African-pygmeoid
C5 - Bushman
Migration path D
According to ophthalmogeometry data, the following races entered this path after the Tibetan: Armenoid, Dinaric and Northern. The Armenoid race gave rise to a branch - the Mediterranean race, and the Dinaric race - the Alpine race.
But according to the system of mathematical approximation of the eyes, the Tibetan race in this migration path is further away from the Armenoid race than in previous migration paths from the neighboring races - Paleo-Siberian, South Asian and Pamir. Therefore, we assumed that between the Tibetan and Armenoid races there should be one more race, not taken into account in A. Yarho’s classification. What race is this?
I have been to Iran several times and each time I was surprised by the fundamental Islamic realities brought to the point of absurdity: during Ramadan, a person who eats before sunset can be arrested, women in forty-degree heat wear two-layer thick black hijaps that cover everything except their eyes. Iranians are black-haired and dark-skinned, they look most like Azerbaijanis.
Iranian women.
But among them sometimes there are light- or red-haired subjects with rather fair skin.
- Who are these fair-haired people? - I asked the Iranian ophthalmologist.
“These are Persians,” he answered.
- Aren’t Persians black-haired and dark-skinned?
- In Iran, about 40% of the population are Azerbaijanis, a large percentage of Kurds, Baluchis and other peoples; they are all dark-haired and dark-skinned. But the native Persians are light-colored. True, they mixed in many ways with other peoples, but true Persians differ from other peoples of Iran.
I remembered some (I don’t remember which) literature that Hitler considered the Persians to be the blood brothers of the Aryan race (meaning Germans*) and, for the sake of renewing German blood, organized marriages between Germans and Persians. Or maybe Hitler was right that the Germans and Persians have the same root of origin?
In Iran, while consulting patients, I met a red-haired Persian woman - the mother of a child patient.
-Are you a purebred Persian? - I asked.
- Yes, but what?
- How did you manage to keep your blood pure?
- We Persians, like other peoples, still try to preserve our blood.
-Can I take a photo of your eyes?
- Why is this necessary?
“In order to identify related points by comparing them with the eyes of your child,” I lied, realizing that in an Islamic country the fact of photographing eyes may be perceived inadequately.
I photographed her eyes, and upon arrival in Russia I carried out an ophthalmogeometric analysis of them. These eyes had approximately such ophthalmogeometric parameters that along the migration route D, in terms of the degree of mathematical approximation, they stood between the Tibetan and Armenoid races.
The eyes of a random woman are not verified photographs of typical representatives of the races in A. Yarkhr’s classification, however, this allowed us to assume that the Persian race existed and still exists, which gave birth to the Armenoid race according to the ophthalmogeometric scheme. In the case of such an assumption, the migration path D is lined up in a clear line according to the degree of mathematical approximation of the eyes to each other.
And in fact, according to the ophthalmogeometric map of human migration, the Persians are representatives of migration path D, and other Iranians are representatives of migration path C (North Caucasian race). That is, they have different roots of origin, which apparently reflected the differences in their appearance.
- It is wrong to call only the Germans an Aryan race, since in many serious sources (E. Blavatsky, E. Roerich, etc.) all people of modern human civilization on earth are called Aryans.
PATH D
D2- Armenoid
D2/1 - Mediterranean
D3- Dinaric
D3/1 - alpine
D4- northern
So, according to our data, the Persian race gave birth to the Armenoid (Armenians). The latter were the ancestors of the Dinaric race, to which scientists include primarily the southern Slavs - Ukrainians, Yugoslavs and others. Moreover, the Armenoid race gave birth, as a blind offshoot, to the Mediterranean race, which includes, I think, Italians, Greeks, Spaniards, Romanians, Georgians, Jews, Arabs and partly Turks.
The Dinaric race was the progenitor of the Alpine (French, partly Spaniards and Italians) and northern (Germans, English, Dutch, Norwegians, Icelanders, Swedes) races.
This migration route, which passed through the Tien Shan, the Caucasus, Europe and the Mediterranean, apparently ended in Iceland *( * The colonization of continents with the formation of countries such as the USA, Australia, etc., which took place much later, is not taken into account here.), where the Vikings of Northern Europe migrated. Religions appeared much later, so even within the same race, different religions spread. Numerous wars in this region led to the periodic dominance of some languages and the disappearance of others, and therefore the linguistic characteristic largely lost the significance of one of the racial characteristics.
For us, residents of Europe, it is probably strange that, according to ophthalmogeometry, one of our origins includes (besides the supposed Persian race) the Armenoid race; Modern Armenians differ too much from other European peoples. But among the Armenians there is a belief that the ancient representatives of this people were fair-skinned and blue-eyed, and modern look Armenians were formed as a result of mixing with other Caucasian peoples.
The Armenoid race, according to the ophthalmogeometric scheme, gave birth, in addition to pure Europeans (Dinaric, northern and Alpine races), also to the Mediterranean race. The latter, having settled around the Mediterranean Sea, gave rise, as it seems to me, to a variety of peoples, including such seemingly disparate peoples as the Italians and Arabs. They have different languages, different religions, but their eyes are related. I cannot say anything, but, in my opinion, they are biologically united, and linguistic and religious aspects overlapped later.
By the way, northern Italians are different from southern ones. The Southern Italians are, in my opinion, pure representatives of the Mediterranean race, while the Northern Italians are the product of a mixture of the Mediterranean race with the Northern and Alpine races.
The Dinaric race, which also originated from the Armenoid race, is currently represented, according to scientists, by the southern Slavs (Ukrainians, Bulgarians, Yugoslavs and others). But the most numerous Slavic people- Russians - differ in appearance and eyes from typical representatives of the Inar race, for example Yugoslavs.
Who are they, Russians? I studied the eyes of Russians and, based on ophthalmo-geometric characteristics, I can say that Russians are most likely a product of mixing the Dinaric race with the Lapenian and Baltic races (Tatars, Komi, Finns, Estonians, etc.), that is, with races that originated from a completely different source of humanity - the migration route of A.
The Dinaric race gave birth, according to our scheme, to the Alpine (French, northern Spaniards, etc.) and northern (Germans, English, Swedes, etc.) races. So the French, Germans and English are the closest "blood brothers" to us - the Slavs. In this regard, Hitler was wrong in considering the Slavs as an inferior branch of human development, subject to destruction, and the Persians as blood brothers; both the Persians and the Slavs are in a single racial-genetic root - migration path D.
Jewish phenomenon
Jews, based on the fact that their origins are in the Sinai Peninsula (the Promised Land), belong to the Mediterranean race. Therefore, their most “blood brothers” are the Arabs, Greeks, southern Italians, and Spaniards.
However, it is known that these people have an extreme variety of appearance: from blond European Jews to almost black Ethiopian Jews. What is the reason for this?
In relatively recent historical period The Jewish people lost their land and settled in different parts of the globe, while maintaining their nation through a religious ban on mixed marriages. Of course, this ban was not implemented one hundred percent, however, we cannot deny its impact. Therefore, it is not clear why, while preserving the nation and its inherent characteristics (culture, customs, etc.), the appearance of Jews differs so sharply on a geographical basis. Bukharan Jews are similar to Uzbeks; Caucasian Jews - to Caucasians, German Jews - to Germans, Moroccan Jews - to Moroccans, Ethiopian - to Ethiopians, etc. Mixed marriages, which partially took place, could not have such a strong influence on the appearance of the Jews, otherwise the Jewish nation would assimilated.
I see the answer to the question posed in the biofield contact of people of different nations with mutual influence on each other’s external characteristics. This idea came to me when I read the works of Dr. A.V. Jiang (Khabarovsk) on experiments with the biofields of animal, bird and plant seed embryos. Thus, Dr. Jiang, by irradiating a chicken egg with the biofields of a duckling, achieved the birth of a chicken with duck feet. In the same way, he achieved the production of melon-cucumber, pear-apple and similar genetically mixed species.
Based on the above, one can think that, for example, Bukharan Jews gradually acquired the features of Uzbeks, not only because mixed marriages sometimes took place, but also because there was a biofield influence of Uzbeks on Jews, and vice versa, during the embryonic period of development. The same principle probably followed the influence of dark-skinned Ethiopians, blond Germans, dark-skinned Caucasians, etc.
Naturally, biofield transmission of genetic information cannot cover all areas of the functioning of the human body (brain, heart, liver, etc.), but it can quite realistically influence external characteristics. This hypothesis, quite understandably, needs scientific and experimental confirmation and in the future, when science reaches a more serious level in the study of biofield effects, it will apparently be tested.
Racism or unity of peoples
For ordinary people the word “race” most often has a negative connotation, as it brings to mind memories of German racism and the war waged by the Nazis in favor of this idea. I repeat once again that the concept of "Aryan race"
illegal due to the fact that all our human civilization is called Aryan (before us there were civilizations of the Atlanteans and Lemurians), and Hitler or his early ideologists assigned the name of our entire current civilization to one people (the Germans), as if emphasizing the exclusive role of the Germans.
But the word "race" is an anthropobiological, not a political concept. There is no analogy here between the kind of race and the degree of mental or entrepreneurial ability of the people. Moreover, ophthalmogeometric calculations showed a strict dependence in the variability of the eyes along the four routes of human migration from Tibet, which leaves no room for the special identification of any one race.
It also cannot be assumed that the final races in each of the migration routes are the most developed; Compare at least migration paths D and B - the highly developed final northern race of path D and the semi-wild terminal Australian race of path B.
The degree of development of different races depends, in my opinion, not on anthropobiological characteristics, but on the prevailing circumstances for the promotion of smart, kind and proactive leaders who are able to guide their people along the path of progress and create conditions (such as democracy) for the preservation of progressive started in the future.
It must be admitted that the development of the northern race (Germans, English, Americans and others) is higher than that of the Dinaric race (Slavs) at the present moment in history. But let's remember the times of Peter I: Russia underwent a great boom of development, which continued for a long time after the death of Peter, and only the October Revolution interrupted Russia's opportunity to become the leading country in the world. The same can be said about Japan, when a third-rate country as a result smart politics leaders has emerged as one of the leading countries in the world.
Of course, it is difficult to expect an economic miracle from, for example, the Australian aborigines or the Papuans of Indonesia, since the lack of progress at some point in history led to the gradual savagery of people, which has already affected the mental abilities of representatives of these races.
So, in my opinion, the degree of development of a particular race is determined by the character of its historical development: the longer a race has followed the path of progress, the more developed it is, and vice versa. There is no stable state for a long time. Stability gradually turns into regression. Man is created by God as a constantly progressing principle, therefore he is doomed to progress. Otherwise, regression and savagery sets in.
Nevertheless, ophthalmogeometric studies have shown, among other studies and hypotheses of this kind, that humanity arose from a single source, ultimately from the genes of one foremother and one forefather. Originating in Tibet, humanity spread across the globe. In this regard, humanity is one biologically and genetically, each person is a brother or sister to another.
Naturally, degraded and savage peoples were, are, and will be displaced by more developed peoples. There is no need to particularly feel sorry for them, they themselves are to blame for this. But humanity, obviously, will soon come to the creation of a single planetary state and a single language. This is dictated not only by common sense, but also determined by the genetic and biological essence of man.
So, by analyzing the eyes of the human races, we have come to the conclusion that modern humanity arose from a single Tibetan root. At the same time, the question is legitimate: who originally gave birth to humanity in Tibet? Who is the foremother and ancestor of modern man?
The KP columnist studied the sacred texts and made an incredible discovery
Change text size: A A
Let us turn to the genealogy of the first man on earth, Adam. In the Old Testament it is written in black and white: “all the days of Adam’s life were nine hundred and thirty years; and he died."
Adam's son Seth lived 912 years. Grandson Enos - 905. Great-grandson Cainan - 910. Great-great-grandson Malaleel - 895. Great-great-great-grandson Jared - 962. The next descendant Enoch - 365. Methuselah and all - 969! Record holder for the longest life on the planet. It’s not for nothing that there is an expression of Methuselah’s centuries. Lamech - 777. Noah – 950.
By simple addition and division we find out: the average life expectancy of the patriarchs of the nine antediluvian generations was 912 years. (The tenth, Enoch, does not count; he was taken alive to heaven at the age of 365. But he managed to give birth to Methuselah himself!)
Each of these respectable fathers of families also had sons and daughters. But only the first-born in the line of Adam are mentioned in the genealogy. We must assume that the other children lived for a long time.
It is strange that the Old Testament does not say how long the progenitor of mankind, Eve and her heirs, lived. Perhaps because it was created from Adam's rib. Sorry, feminists, but you can’t erase words from the Bible. The iron patriarchy ruled the roost until the flood, women knew their place...
DO EVERYONE CALENDARS LIE?
But why, why did the first people live so long?
I remember that the country’s leading gerontologist (specialist in aging), academician of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, on the “Direct Line” with readers of Komsomolskaya Pravda, answered a similar question succinctly and authoritatively: “Then in the Bible, a month was considered a year!” I sat next to the academician and allowed him to doubt. “Scientifically proven fact!” - said the Honored Scientist of the Russian Federation.
Yes, you can’t argue against science.
The other day, having taken up this biblical detective story, I asked a burning question about the Methuselah Age to another respected gerontologist, geneticist, Doctor of Science. “The Bible was rewritten in different languages in different centuries,” the scientist clearly explained. - There was a translation error. In the original it was “lunar month”, but the ancient translator put the word “year”. Then it went like this. And if you recalculate, life expectancy was around 80 years, which is realistic.”
It turns out that the legendary Methuselah actually lived only a little over 80?! The rest of the patriarchs are even less. This is what omniscient science means!
Not otherwise, the demon misled the ancient translator. He brought him some strong wine, or inadvertently pushed him under the elbow. The evil one has brought confusion into the holy book. Oh, this Satan! First, under the guise of a serpent, he tempted Eve to eat the forbidden fruit from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. For which the Lord was angry with Adam and his frivolous wife and drove them out of Eden. Thus, the first people and all their descendants, including you and me, lost eternal, endless life, violating the original plan of the Creator. And then the demon replaced the month in the Bible with a year and the people different countries For thousands of years now people have been wondering why people lived for nine centuries before the flood, but now only a few can barely reach one.
You can safely close the journalistic investigation.
FIVE-YEAR-OLD FATHERS!
But one hitch emerged. Judging by the Old Testament chronicle, Adam gave birth to Seth at the age of 130. If you believe our gerontological scientists, in fact, the first father of the planet was not yet eleven years old. But before Seth, for a minute, he managed to give birth to as many as two sons. I lost them as adults. Remember the story of how Cain killed Abel and went into exile himself. Only after this loss did Adam conceive Seth, by the way. To prolong the race. He gave Adam his grandson Enos at the age of 105. Divide by 12. So, is the young parent under 9 years old? Gee! An even greater mystery is Adam's great-great-grandson Malleleil. He became the father of Jared at 65. If you follow the scientific version that the antediluvian year was equal to our month, he conceived his first-born when he himself was not even five years old. Isn’t science itself funny? In the antediluvian 65, by the way, Enoch gave birth to Methuselah himself.
So there is an inconsistency, comrades scientists, in your scientific formula - “a year for a month.”
“FOR DEBROKE, FOR DRUNKENNESS, FOR BRANDBAND!”
Then came the Universal Flood. Well, I guess everyone has heard about him. The Lord was angry with the people for their sins and decided to drown everyone.
A quick question: for what specific sins? I think most people don't know.
When Adam's descendants began to multiply on earth, "the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were beautiful, and they took them as wives as they chose." And the daughters of men began to bear giants to the sons of God. Isn’t it their giant skeletons that archaeologists still periodically find in different parts of the world? And who are the sons of God themselves? The Bible doesn't give the answer. Some consider them Atlanteans, others - aliens from other planets, the same Nibiru. However, this is a topic for a separate biblical detective story, beyond the scope of our today’s investigation.
“And the Lord saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every intent of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually... And the Lord said, “I will destroy from the face of the earth man whom I have created, from man to beast, and the creeping thing, and the bird of the air, I will destroy...”
He pardoned only the pious grandson of Methuselah, the six-hundred-year-old Noah and his wife, and his three sons and their spouses. He ordered Noah to build a huge ark, to take into it on the appointed day his large family and a pair of each creature. For divorce after the flood.
And now, citizens, attention!
“In the six hundredth year of Noah’s life, in the second month, on the seventeenth day of the month, on that day all the fountains of the great deep burst forth, and the windows of heaven were opened. And rain poured on the earth for forty days and forty nights... Every creature that was on the surface of the earth was destroyed; from man to cattle, and creeping things, and birds of the air; only Noah and everything that was with him in the ark remained. And the water began to subside at the end of one hundred and fifty days. And the ark rested in the seventh month, on the seventeenth day of the month, on the mountains of Ararat.”
Judging by the Bible, the ark sailed until it stopped over Ararat for exactly 5 months - 150 days. So a month was 30 days. Much like today.
What if there were only 7 months in the Old Testament year, the meticulous reader will ask? Then Methuselah’s age will be almost half as long, and with young 65-year-old fathers everything will be fine!
“The water constantly decreased until the tenth month. On the first day of the tenth month the tops of the mountains appeared. After forty days (almost the middle of the eleventh! - Author) Noah opened the window of the ark that he had made.” And he released a dove to find out if there was dry land somewhere. He returned without finding her. After hesitating for seven days, Noah released the bird again. In the evening it flew in with an olive leaf in its beak. After waiting another seven days, the patriarch released the dove again, and it never returned. Apparently he found a piece of sushi somewhere and stayed. And Noah continued to wait. Until the end of the twelfth month. And only “in the year six hundred and one, on the first day of the first month, the water on the earth dried up and Noah opened the lid of the ark.” The earth dried up only by the twenty-seventh day of the second month. It was then that God ordered Noah to leave the ark along with his family, all the livestock, creeping things, and disperse throughout the earth to be fruitful and multiply.
SENTENCE - 120 YEARS FOR LIFE
At least we sorted out the calendar. It turns out that with the Old Testament chronology everything was the same as today. I specifically do not name the academician and doctor of sciences I really respect, who misled me with the “scientific” formula - the biblical year is equal to the modern month. They themselves clearly did not read the Bible, although the topic of longevity touched upon in it is the work of their lives. They simply repeated a version widespread in scientific circles, which cleverly refutes the Methuselah century, which is inexplicable to scientists. That is why I quoted the Bible in such detail and cited facts. You don't have to believe me. And don’t believe it, it’s better to check it yourself. Today is not Soviet atheistic times; anyone interested can easily find and read the Bible.
There is also a version that the then 10 years went by in one current year. But how will she explain that Mallelel and Enoch gave birth to their first children at 6.5 years old?
Even before the flood, angry at people who sinned with the sons of God, the Lord said: “My Spirit will not forever be despised by men; because they are flesh; Let their days be a hundred and twenty years." This, dear readers, is where all the scientists talk about how a person should live 120 years. From the Bible. (If we take the “scientific formulas of biblical chronology”, it turns out that God allotted us 10-12 years. Nonsense!!!)
Now let’s look closely at how the Lord’s strict sentence to sinful humanity to shorten life from 969 Methuselah years to 120 was fulfilled.
The fulfillment did not happen instantly, by the method of a Divine Miracle, as one might think: someone hits 120 - immediately give your soul to God! And gradually. Evolutionary. Already after the global flood.
Noah himself, having descended from the ark with his family and livestock, no longer experienced the joy of fatherhood. Although he lived another 350 years after the universal cataclysm. And he rested in God in 950. The earth was populated by numerous descendants of his sons: Shem, Ham and Japheth. But in the Old Testament, according to tradition, the genealogy of only the firstborn Noah is described in detail.
Shem himself, born before the Flood, lived 600 years, his son Arphaxad, who was born two years after the universal flood - 438, grandson Sal - 433, great-grandson Eber - 464, great-great-grandson Peleg - 239, Raghav - 239, Serukh - 230, Nahor - 148, Terah - 205. Terah's son - the legendary "father of many tribes" Abraham - 175, his wife Sarah - 127. Abraham's son Isaac - 180, grandson Jacob - 147, great-grandson Joseph - only 110. The same wise Joseph who predicted Egyptian pharaoh seven fat years and seven hungry years. After his death, his body was embalmed and placed in an ark in Egypt.
And soon the prophet Moses will lead all Jews from Egyptian captivity to the Promised Land. Moses himself lived exactly 120 years, designated by the Lord. But here is his curious psalm:
“The days of our years are seventy years,
and with greater strength - eighty years;
and their best time is labor and illness,
for they pass quickly, and we fly.”
It was said before the birth of Christ, but as if about us, the unfortunates of the 21st century.
Judging by the pedigree of Shem, it took only a dozen generations of the descendants of the 950-year-old patriarch Noah for life expectancy to sharply and steadily decrease. Frozen at our modern level. What happened? Universal flood? But the water has gone, the earth has dried up. And people did not stop sinning after the Flood. The burning of Sodom and Gomorrah for homosexuality happened under Abraham.
There are speculative pseudo-scientific hypotheses that before the Flood there was a huge steam-water dome above the earth’s atmosphere. 12 meters thick! He, they say, like a screen, reliably protected the planet and the first people from harmful cosmic rays and ultraviolet radiation, absorbing more than 70% of the radioactive background. At the same time, it created a greenhouse effect, plus additional atmospheric pressure. There was 50 percent more oxygen on earth. People lived as if in a giant greenhouse combined with a healing hyperbaric chamber. All year round, supposedly, everything was blooming and fragrant. It was easy to breathe. Therefore, a person could run hundreds of kilometers tirelessly. No illnesses for you, they say. And if any illness happened, people quickly recovered. The food is all natural, enriched with all vitamins and other additives.
During the flood, the heavens opened up, the entire layer of water poured onto the earth, flooding it. The protective screen disappeared, and Noah’s descendants had no salvation from evil cosmic radiation, ultraviolet radiation, or any gamma-beta rays. Mutations, degenerative changes, diseases, epidemics began. And then the climate changed, the earth’s axis shifted, the cold appeared regularly... That’s why, they say, human life became difficult and short.
But, I repeat, these are all amateur hypotheses that are not confirmed by the Bible.
EAT PINEAPPLES, CHEW WEED!
But this is what is indicated in the Bible itself in plain text! Having created man and woman in the first week, God said: “Behold, I have given you every herb yielding seed that is on all the earth, and every tree that has fruit yielding seed; it shall be for you to eat.”
It turns out that the Creator created the first people as vegetarians. Clean. The so-called vegans. No eggs, caviar, milk, cheese and other gastronomic tricks with livestock and poultry products, as many modern vegetarians do. Only fruits, vegetables, grains. From birth until death. No “fasting days”. Eternal Lent!
Moreover, the Creator also made animals herbivores. “And to every beast of the earth, and to every bird of the air, and to every thing that creeps on the earth, in which there is life, I have given every green herb for food. And so it became.”
Imagine an idyll: lions, tigers, cows, wolves, hares, people walking calmly together. Nobody eats anyone! And everyone lives for centuries.
But people did not appreciate such grace. They became soft and indulged in debauchery and other indecencies. And the Lord, outraged by this black ingratitude, decided to drown the sinners. And future generations will have their lives reduced to 120 years. So that you don't spoil them too much. And therefore, he gave a different covenant to Noah and his family who came out of the ark than to his distant ancestor Adam. “Let all the beasts of the earth, and all the birds of the air, and all that moves on the earth, and all the fish of the sea, fear and tremble at you; they are given into your hands. Every moving thing that lives will be food for you; I give you everything like green herbs.” Later, through Moses, the Lord gave people a large list of clean and unclean animals, fish, birds and reptiles, specifying who can be eaten and who cannot.
As you can see, only the diet changed dramatically after the flood. A person was allowed to jump off veganism, eat meat, milk, eggs and other animal foods, which, according to science, give strength, fats and proteins necessary for the body. After only a dozen generations of direct descendants of the antediluvian patriarch, 950-year-old Noah, life expectancy sharply and inexorably decreased on animal food. There are 120 years before those awarded by the Creator. And this is in exceptional cases. Our usual destiny is still 70-80 years. What did Moses mourn about in ancient times in his famous psalm?
One must think that it was precisely meat-eating that became the Creator’s humane instrument for carrying out his non-appealable sentence to radically shorten the lives of sinful people.
And in memory of the golden ages of vegetarianism in Christianity, I believe, fasts have been preserved. On March 14, the strictest of them begins - the Great. It will last until May 1st.
You'll probably ask why vegetarians today don't live much longer than meat eaters. Honestly, I don't know. Although medicine does find small advantages of plant nutrition over animal nutrition. Perhaps because there are no generations of pure vegans who would eat this way for several centuries without a single violation. Then it would be possible to look at the results, compare statistics, genealogies, as in the Bible before and after the Flood. This is a matter for scientists. There are many of them now among vegetarians. Let them figure it out. My job as a journalist is to solve the biblical detective story about centenarians.
OTHER OPINION
NOT MEAT, BUT SINS HAVE SHORTENED OUR LIFE
Sergei ZUBOV, teacher at the Moscow Theological Academy:
Indeed, initially man’s food was plant-based: And God said: Behold, I have given you every herb yielding seed that is on all the earth, and every tree that has fruit yielding seed; - [this] will be food for you (Gen. 1:29).
The animals didn't eat meat either.
Initially, man was potentially immortal, that is, immortality was given to him by God, the reason for it was in God. The task of man was, by becoming like God in caring for creation, in obedience to God, to ascend from strength to strength and achieve likeness to Him. Since God is the source of life, then man, becoming more and more like God, would reveal divine properties in himself - this process is endless, because God Himself is infinite.
The whole problem is not a “diet”, but a violation of God’s commandments. The Fall occurred and the road to immortality was closed for man. After the Fall, man cannot help but sin. Accordingly, if you give him eternal life, then this means the opportunity for endless improvement in sins.
Therefore, God expels man from Paradise: And the Lord God said: Behold, Adam has become like one of Us, knowing good and evil; and now, as if he did not stretch out his hand, and also took from the tree of life, and did not eat, and began to live forever (Gen. 3:22). - God limits the human age so that man cannot sin forever.
Please note that it is not after the flood that God shortens the duration of life, but before that: And the Lord said: My Spirit will not forever be despised by men; because they are flesh; let their days be one hundred and twenty years (Gen. 6:3).
And permission to eat meat is given after the flood, rather, to strengthen a person, because, probably, the world and conditions of existence have changed.
Thus, according to Orthodox theology, the duration of a person’s earthly life was shortened not because of eating meat, but because of committing sins:
1. the fall of Adam and Eve in Paradise - a person becomes mortal;
2. the sins of antediluvian humanity - the age of man is shortened.
In both cases, the reduction is due to a decrease in the time of confirmation in committing sins.
In the book of the Wisdom of Solomon we read:
Do not hasten death by the errors of your life and do not attract destruction to yourself by the works of your hands (Wis. 1:12).
Righteousness is immortal, but unrighteousness causes death: the wicked attracted her with their hands and words, considered her a friend and wasted away, and entered into an alliance with her, for they are worthy to be her lot (Wis. 1, 15-16).
The Bible says this about the impact on life expectancy: Honor your father and your mother, so that your days on earth may be long (Ex. 20:12). At the very beginning, man did not honor the Father. And as a result, man became mortal.
FIVE OLDEST RESIDENTS ON EARTH
All were women and their age was documented.
1. Jeanne KALMAN, France. 122 years, 164 days. (1875-1997)
2. Sarah KNAUSS, USA. 119 years, 97 days. (1880-1999)
3. Lucy HANNA, USA. 117 years, 248 days (1875-1993)
4. Maria Louise MAILER, Canada. 117 years, 230 days (1880-1998)
5. Misao OKAWA, Japan. 117 years, 27 days (1898 – 2015)
BY THE WAY
TO BELIEVE - NOT TO BELIEVE?
The Flood appears not only in the Christian Bible. Legends about him are preserved in the myths and religious texts of many peoples of Australia, North and South America, India, Europe, Papua New Guinea, Japan, China, the Middle East... British anthropologist and historian of religions J. J. Fraser collected about a hundred such versions around the world . Legends about the first ancient long-livers - gods, kings - were also widespread among different nations. Let us at least remember our Kashchei the Immortal.
Atheist scientists often call the Bible a collection of myths, legends about the origin of the Earth and man, which have nothing to do with science. But, let’s agree, the deeply scientific Big Bang theory about the origin of the Universe is also just a hypothesis, albeit the most widespread one yet. She has many critics in the scientific community. And alternative versions. The main thing is that there is still no answer, what happened before the Explosion? After all, an empty space does not explode. There are also critics of the scientific theory about the origin of man from apes. What is the origin? Modern gerontologists and biologists still cannot clearly explain why a person ages. There are dozens of deeply scientific, smart theories on this subject, sometimes mutually exclusive. Some academics believe that a person, like a military missile, is programmed for self-destruction, others blame free radicals that cause “rust” in the body, and others blame “trash” that clogs the body...
So everyone has the right to believe in what they want.
Agree, most of us associate childhood with something light, airy and carefree in nature. But this is not the case in all countries. Many children, unfortunately, do not experience the best moments in their lives.
I would like to show photos that reflect childhood in different countries. These photos are the whole stories of children's lives. You will now feel how different the wonderful time of childhood can be. Look!
Parents work in the fields to earn at least a little money, and a 90-year-old granny looks after her grandson. Province GYICHGDGOY.
A child who was left homeless plays at a burial site. Manila.
Camilla STANISHEVSKAYA's daughter sheds tears because she doesn't want to do her homework. The girl is 6 years old.
In West Africa, children must undergo a special ritual. They are given special scars, but it is very painful.
SIKH temple, religious ceremony. PARMA.
Indonesia, Sumatera Barat. Children play in the jungle.
KAIFUNA. A child plays near the place where dogs are butchered.
In the photo, the NAVJOT ritual is being performed, something similar to baptism.
KAIR. The photographer asked the boy to smile, but he refused.
Senegal. The girl is riding on the bus.
West Africa, a 2 year old child is going through an important aspect of his life. Very traumatized and painful for the kids. A ritual in which a child is forcibly scarred.
In OMANE, the boy was entrusted with holding his dad's weapon.
Aborigines on the islands.
School in the village of YGANDE. Children read prayers.
Boy in a field with cows.
At a doctor's appointment at the KARL-MAR-MOLLER Institute, children are playing.
SAIDA. The girl is tired.
MYMBAI. Children play in the place of abandoned cars.
The world is full of similar people who are not connected by blood ties. How is it possible that two people, born and raised in different parts of the world, look like two peas in a pod? Is there a clear scientific explanation for this phenomenon?
People who are similar to each other and are not relatives - is this possible? It turns out yes. A French photographer once had a wonderful idea. He found and captured on film similar people who were not related by any blood ties. His name is Francois Brunelle. It took him about twelve years to realize his idea. The photographer tracked people with eerily similar features around the world and helped them find their doppelgängers. Some photos of similar people from the work of Francois Brunelle are presented in this article. Carefully study the proposed images and compare how many similarities there are between complete strangers who are not related by blood.
Every person in this world has 7 doubles
They say that every person in this world has at least seven very similar people. One can easily agree that this assumption is quite frightening and unnatural. It is hardly possible to find two exact copies on our planet, identical as two drops of water. Even blood twins have features that, at least slightly, make it possible for those around them to distinguish them, not to mention a stranger who lives on the other side of the Earth.
Not the same, but still incredible similar people still occur, and not as rarely as it might seem. They live in different cities, countries, continents, lead a completely different way of life. They do not have common genes, they differ in language and culture, but their similarity really cannot be denied.
Same appearance - same character?
We all know that there are similar people. Is this purely a superficial resemblance? Can a person and his counterpart from another country have the same character traits and type of activity? It would be strange and surprising at the same time. In fact, it happens in different ways. For example, there once lived in Rome an emperor named Maximin (early 4th century AD), and so, looking at his bust, you can see in his features the dictator from the 20th century, familiar to everyone - Adolf Hitler. These similar people not only had the same facial features, but both were dictators in their time, and both died ignominiously.
It is quite difficult to answer this question; modern science does not have exact answers, there are only guesses. One of the most likely versions is the one that explains the external similarity of complete strangers by an identical genetic structure. For a reason that is unclear to date, similar people have exactly the same DNA.
These twins are also called biogenic. This means that their genetic material is the same, but their biological parents are different. It happens that people can be similar and live in different places at the same time and be the same age. Some may be separated by years, centuries, or even entire millennia. Natural diversity, it turns out, is not limitless, there are billions of people in the world, and there is always a chance random coincidence genetic sets.
Secret relationship
Scientists believe it is quite possible that similar people are very, very distant relatives. By resorting to basic mathematical analysis, one can make the following calculations: the average citizen, after eight generations, will be the descendant of 256 relatives who, one way or another, are related by blood ties. If we imagine that 40, 50 or more generations have passed, the relatives will number in the millions. And no one knows where the genetic material will coincide and in what generation.
In card jargon, genes are shuffled like cards in a deck, but at a certain moment the same “hands” appear with minimal probability. Then doubles are born, people who are as similar to each other as two peas in a pod. Perhaps nature has its own plans for this, its own secret goals.
Search for doubles on the Internet
Today, on the World Wide Web, there are many sites with which you can find an exact copy of yourself among show business stars, great emperors and historically significant leaders using photographs. They are also looking for their doubles among the most ordinary people of their different cities and states. All you have to do is upload your photo in a certain format, and after a while the search engines will be able to find for you a couple of twins, or at least people who will be very similar to you.
Such sites are quite popular, because it is actually interesting to know, and even more so to see, your double. It's like meeting yourself in parallel world. Before the advent of the Internet, this was almost impossible to do, but now there are many opportunities. active search, and why not use them?
Miracles, and that's all
Doppelgangers are a phenomenon that is interesting in itself. People are more or less accustomed to the similarity of blood twins and granddaughters and their great-grandmothers, but to meet a person who is exactly like another person who is not a relative, and even lives thousands of kilometers away, this is more interesting.
Who knows, maybe in the future scientists will figure out how to use this quirk of nature. It is likely that the similarity of genomes can open up incredible prospects in such a field of medicine as transplantology. As biologists assure, the chance of an exact match of genetic sets infinitely approaches zero. However, partial copying of genes is quite normal, which proves that all of humanity is one big family.
