I. A. Goncharov’s novel “Oblomov” was published in 1859, at a time when the issue of abolition of serfdom was extremely acute in the country, when Russian society has already fully realized the destructiveness of the existing order. Deep knowledge of life and accuracy social analysis characters allowed the writer to find a surprisingly correct definition of the way of Russian life of that time - “Oblomovism”.
Main task the author in the novel - to show how a person gradually dies in a person, how unadapted a landowner is to life, not accustomed to doing anything. The main qualities of the kind, sweet Ilya Ilyich Oblomov are his inertia, apathy, and aversion to any activity. True to the traditions of realism, I. A. Goncharov shows that these qualities were the result of Oblomov’s upbringing; they were born from the confidence that any of his desires would be fulfilled and no effort needed to be made for this. Oblomov is a nobleman, he does not have to work for a piece of bread - hundreds of Zakharov serfs work for him on the estate and completely ensure his existence. This means that he can lie on the couch all day long, not because he is tired, but because “this was his normal state.” He almost merged with his soft, comfortable robe and long, wide shoes, which he masterfully slipped into the first time, as soon as he dangled his feet from the sofa.
In his youth, Oblomov “was full of all sorts of aspirations, hopes, expected a lot from fate and himself, kept preparing for some field, for some role.” But time passed, and Ilya Ilyich was still getting ready, getting ready to start new life, but made no progress towards any goal. In Moscow he received a good education, but his head “was like a library, consisting of only knowledge scattered in parts.” Entering the service, which had previously seemed to him in the form of some kind of family occupation, he did not even imagine that life would immediately be divided into two halves for him, one of which would consist of work and boredom, which for him were synonymous, and the other - from peace and peaceful fun. He realized that “it would take at least an earthquake to prevent a healthy person from coming to work,” and therefore he soon resigned, then stopped going out into the world and completely shut himself up in his room. If Oblomov recognizes some kind of work, it is only the work of the soul, since dozens of generations of his ancestors “endured labor as a punishment imposed on our forefathers, but they could not love, and where there was a chance, they always got rid of it, finding it possible and due."
There were moments in Oblomov’s life when he thought about the reasons that prompted him to lead such a life, when he asked himself the question: “Why am I like this?” In the climactic chapter of the novel “Oblomov’s Dream,” the writer answers this question. He creates a picture of provincial landowner life and shows how lazy hibernation gradually becomes the normal state of a person.
In a dream, Oblomov is transported to his parents’ estate Oblomovka, “to a blessed corner of the earth,” where there is “no sea, no high mountains, rocks, abysses, dense forests“There is nothing grandiose, wild and gloomy.” An idyllic picture appears before us, a series of beautiful landscapes. “The annual circle is performed there correctly and calmly. Deep silence lies in the fields. Silence and peace of life also reign in the morals of the people in that region,” writes I. A. Goncharov. Oblomov sees himself as a little boy, striving to look into the unknown, ask more questions and get answers. But only caring for food becomes the first and main concern of life in Oblomovka. And the rest of the time is occupied by “some kind of all-consuming, invincible dream,” which I. A. Goncharov makes a symbol characterizing people like Oblomov, and which he calls “the true likeness of death.” From childhood, Ilya was accustomed to the fact that he did not have to do anything, that for any job there was “Vaska, Vanka, Zakharka,” and at some point he himself realized that it was “much calmer” this way. And therefore, all those “seeking manifestations of strength” in Ilyusha “turned inward and sank, withering away.” Such a life deprived the hero of the novel of any initiative and gradually turned him into a slave of his position, his habits, and even a slave of his servant Zakhar.
In his article “What is Oblomovism?” N.A. Dobrolyubov wrote: “Oblomov is not a stupid apathetic figure without aspirations and feelings, but a person who is also looking for something in life, thinking about something.” He is endowed with many positive qualities, and not stupid. His judgments contain sad truth- also a consequence Russian life. What are all these Sudbinskys, Volkins, Penkovs striving for? Indeed, is it worth getting up from the couch for the sake of the petty fuss that his former comrades are busy with?
In the spirit of the tradition created by Russian writers, I. A. Goncharov subjects his hero to the greatest test - the test of love. A feeling for Olga Ilyinskaya, a girl of enormous spiritual strength, could resurrect Oblomov. But I. A. Goncharov is a realist, and he cannot show a happy ending to the novel. “Why did everything die? Who cursed you, Ilya? What ruined you? - Olga bitterly tries to understand. And the writer gives the answer to these questions, absolutely precisely defining the name of this evil - Oblomovism. And Ilya Ilyich was not the only one who became her victim. “Our name is legion!” - he says to Stolz. And indeed, almost all the heroes of the novel were amazed by “Oblomovism” and became its victims: Zakhar, Agafya Pshenitsyna, Stolz, and Olga.
Greatest Merit I. A. Goncharov is that he surprisingly accurately depicted the disease that struck Russian society in the mid-19th century, which N. A. Dobrolyubov characterized as “the inability to actively want something,” and pointed to the social causes of this phenomenon.
Very often people are overly lenient with themselves, so they do not pay attention to the small and large weaknesses to which they succumb.
This is exactly what happened with the main character of the novel “Oblomov”. Ilya Ilyich was not by nature an active and active person. Although he had all the prerequisites not to vegetate, lying on the couch, but to strive for something.
Ilya Ilyich’s childhood can rightfully be called a happy period. The boy was surrounded universal love and care. Usually happy and cheerful children grow up into very active people who do not want to turn their lives into a monotonous and gray existence. But little Ilya was spoiled by overly obsessive care; he was not allowed to exercise any freedom.
The hero’s mother “let him go for a walk in the garden, around the yard, in the meadow, with strict confirmation to the nanny not to leave the child alone, not to let him near horses, dogs, goats, not to go far from the house, and most importantly, not to let him into the ravine, like the most terrible place in the area, which enjoyed a bad reputation.” One can easily imagine how a child who was forbidden to express his will in childhood will grow up. Gradually, he begins to lose interest in learning new things. Oblomov is carefree and carefree. In youth, such qualities can be forgiven, but as a person grows up, responsibility for his own destiny must appear. Meanwhile, Ilya Ilyich himself does not strive for anything at all, therefore he bears absolutely no responsibility for his life.
And gradually, everything really becomes indifferent to him. As a child, Ilya loved to listen to his nanny’s fairy tales. And, obviously, fairy-tale fiction was so close and understandable to him that as he grew older, he could not get rid of his completely unnecessary and useless daydreaming. “The adult Ilya Ilyich, although he later learns that there are no honey and milk rivers, no good sorceresses, although he jokes with a smile at his nanny’s stories, but this smile is insincere, it is accompanied by a secret sigh: his fairy tale is mixed with life, and he sometimes he is helplessly sad, why is a fairy tale not life, and why is life not a fairy tale…”.
A dream helps a person move forward, achieve new things, and make amazing discoveries. But it may turn out to be the only achievement that a person is capable of. This is exactly what happened with Oblomov. He spends his days in fruitless dreams, thinking about nothing else.
Ilya Ilyich replaces real life with fictional one. Gradually, he loses strength, because inaction undermines a person from the inside, makes him weak and weak-willed. A person's character is formed by facing difficulties. Namely, it was difficulties that Ilya Ilyich was most afraid of. Suffice it to recall his attitude towards service. Ilya Ilyich would like service to be something like an optional and easy activity.
Oblomov tries to free himself from responsibilities at any cost. Suffice it to remember that once Ilya Ilyich made a mistake and sent important documents to the wrong city. When they began to look for the culprit, “Oblomov did not wait for the well-deserved punishment, he went home and sent a medical certificate.”
Oblomov cleverly avoided responsibility; he simply left his service with the intention of never returning there. Is Oblomov significantly different from most people? Of course, laziness, apathy and inertia are characteristic of many people to one degree or another. However, people still have to face reality, struggle with difficulties, and end up celebrating success or failure. This is precisely the meaning of human life.
It is paradoxical that during a short period of service, when Oblomov was frightened by the need to spend a lot of time on work, he was bothered by the thought: “When will I live? When to live?” He was afraid that constant responsibilities would take away his personal time, deprive him of the joy and fullness of life sensations. But when Oblomov left the service, nothing good or interesting appeared in his life. He strove for freedom in order to “live,” but at the same time refused a real, full-blooded and vibrant life.
(No Ratings Yet)
- The novel “Oblomov” was created over many years with long breaks. It was started in 1846. In the summer of 1849, after a fifteen-year stay in the capital, Goncharov made a trip to his homeland. Them...
- Oblomov and “Oblomovism” in I. A. Goncharov’s novel “Oblomov” I. Goncharov’s moral sensitivity. Modern society, presented in the novel, in the moral, psychological, philosophical and social aspects of its existence. II. “Oblomovshchina.” 1. Oblomov...
- In the novel “Oblomov,” Goncharov presented two images, or types of life: life in motion and life in a state of rest, sleep. The first type of life is more typical for people with strong character, energetic...
- I. A. Goncharov’s novel “Oblomov” became part of the solution to Russian literature moral problems. Already at the beginning of the novel, the author drew attention to the main feature of his hero: his soul is so open and clear...
- Why didn’t Olga Ilyinskaya manage to change Oblomov? (based on the novel “Oblomov” by I. A. Goncharov) “Oblomov” appeared when serfdom increasingly revealed its inconsistency, and the novel immediately attracted the attention of readers....
- Oblomov's personality is far from ordinary, although other characters treat him with slight disrespect. For some reason they read him as almost inferior in comparison to them. Exactly...
- Andrei Stolts is Oblomov’s closest friend; they grew up together and carried their friendship through life. It remains a mystery how such dissimilar people, with such different views on life, could retain deep...
- Modernism is a general concept for a number of styles and trends not only in literature, but in everything art world, which is characterized by a new perception of human existence after realism. For...
- We are all born into this world with our own inner voice, unlike others, which always tells us what to do in a difficult situation, how to behave correctly. It is he who separates and...
- The appearance of the comedy “The Inspector General” in 1836 caused an uplifting, exciting feeling in society. More than 160 years have passed since then, but the comedy “The Inspector General” has not lost its relevance and its sound today...
- Communication is one of the most important things that makes a person happy, sociable and friendly. For many centuries, our speech has changed, improved and made more convenient. It is without language that there is no communication, but...
- Making a person laugh is a very difficult task, which sometimes even the most best actors and writers. It's much easier to make people cry. To make the viewer or reader laugh...
- Poem by N.V. Gogol “ Dead Souls” (1835-1841) belongs to those timeless works of art that address large-scale artistic generalizations and fundamental problems human life. In the deadening of the souls of Gogol's characters...
- We often hear from parents and teachers - you must be responsible! Why should I be like that? And what is responsibility anyway? Firstly, what exactly do people understand by the word...
- “Do you know that you are human?” a very interesting and significant question that prompts many people to think philosophically. The relevance of this issue in modern world There’s no point in denying it, because looking at...
- A person’s upbringing is a very valuable trait that is worth paying attention to and developing in yourself. What is education? This is tactfulness - the ability to perceive other people positively, to be polite...
- One of the components of happiness, one of the noblest goals of life and one of the greatest manifestations of humanity is love. We love not only people, we are imbued with this feeling for our brothers...
- Myths are found in the folklore of all peoples of the world. The roots of the word “myth” stretch back to ancient Greece- it means “legend, legend.” Myths are the cradle of humanity. They originated in ancient times...
- IN epic works Unlike Lyrical, it is told, it is narrated about various events that occur in a certain sequential order. So, in the fairy tale “ Snow Queen“H. C. Andersen we learn how Gerda searched, found...
- It is difficult to imagine literary works without allegory. To speak correctly, this literary device simply necessary. An allegory is the expression of an abstract thought through a real image. This way of expression is very popular both in...
- Every person who has read I. A. Goncharov’s novel “Oblomov” involuntarily thinks about the question: who is he, this Ilya Ilyich? An unfortunate man who failed to properly manage his life, his talents...
- Personification is endowment inanimate objects qualities that are inherent only to animate, that is, living beings. In other words, we can say that this is the spiritualization of inanimate objects, this technique is a type of metaphor and...
- Sometimes we don’t even notice how firmly special stable phrases have entered our lives and our language, which are perceived as inseparable statements and reproduced in the form of an integral structure that is equated... The concept of “epic” reflects one of literary families, in which the author objectively describes the real world around him. Interacting with his realities, he himself can act as the main character or only leads the narrative... At a time when tolerant relations between by individuals and even entire states were not proclaimed as a means to create a new, humane image of humanity, there were often conflicts, the resolution of which even...
Introduction
Ivan Goncharov for the first time in his novel “Oblomov” introduces a new concept for Russian literature “Oblomovism”, which denoted a special social tendency, characteristic, first of all, of the Russian people, concluded in complete lack of will, apathy, constant laziness and excessive daydreaming, when illusions are replaced real life, and the person degrades. The very word “Oblomovshchina” comes from the name of the main character of the work - Oblomov and the name of his native village - Oblomovka, which was the focus of everything that led to the gradual decline of Ilya Ilyich as a person, his complete isolation from the world and final escapism. The depiction of Oblomov and “Oblomovism” in Goncharov’s novel is a reflection of the process of gradual change, the “breaking” of a person who is instilled with unnatural values and desires, which ultimately leads to tragic consequences - the acquisition of a false meaning of life, fear real world And early death hero.
Oblomovka and “Oblomovism”
The roots of the appearance of “Oblomovism” in Oblomov lie in the childhood of the hero - Ilya Ilyich grew up in a distant village, literally cut off from the real world and the center of Russia - Oblomovka. The Oblomov estate is located in a picturesque, quiet, peaceful area, where the climate pleased with its moderation and tranquility, where there were no heavy rains, hurricanes or winds, a raging sea or majestic mountains, instead of which there were gentle hills, even the sky “huddles closer to the ground”, “to hug her tighter, with love: it spread out so low above her head, like a parent’s reliable roof, to protect, it seems, the chosen corner from all adversity.” Everything here promised “a calm, long-term life until the hair turns yellow and an imperceptible, sleep-like death.” Even the seasons followed each other according to the calendar, without destroying the crops with spring snows - everything in Oblomovka went according to its usual way, without changing for decades. In such a semblance of paradise on earth, Oblomov and the Oblomovites developed, protected even by nature from all sorts of hardships, experiences and losses.
People in Oblomovka lived from rite to rite - from birth to wedding and from wedding to funeral. The pacifying nature pacified their disposition, making them quiet, harmless and indifferent to everything: the most terrible atrocities in the village were associated with the theft of peas or carrots, and once found dead person from a neighboring village, they decided to forget about it, since the lives of other communities did not concern them, which means the dead person is not their problem. A similar situation occurred with a letter from a neighboring estate, which described a recipe for beer, but the Oblomovites were afraid to open it right away, fearing bad news that could disturb the usual tranquility of the village. People in Oblomovka did not like work, considering it a duty and trying to get the job done as quickly as possible or even shift it onto the shoulders of someone else. On the estate, all the work was done by the servants, who, as can be seen from the example of Zakhar, were also not the most responsible and hardworking people, but at the same time remained devoted servants of their bar.
The days of the Oblomovites passed in calmness and idleness, and most important event there was a choice of dishes for lunch, when everyone offered their own options, and then everyone consulted, approaching the menu with particular seriousness: “caring for food was the first and main concern of life in Oblomovka. After the meal, everyone fell into a sleepy state, sometimes they behaved lazy meaningless conversations, but more often they were completely silent, gradually falling asleep: “it was some kind of all-consuming, invincible dream, a true likeness of death,” which little Ilya observed from year to year, gradually adopting the model of behavior and values of his parents.
Oblomov's childhood in Oblomovka
As a child, Ilya was an inquisitive, active child who tried in every possible way to understand the world around him. He wanted, like other children, to run through the fields, climb trees, walk where it was forbidden, or, climbing into the hayloft, admire the river and magnificent landscapes from above. Oblomov liked to watch animals and explore the surrounding area. However, overly protective parents, who from infancy surrounded Ilya with constant care and control, forbade the boy to actively interact with the world and study it, instilling in him completely different, “Oblomov” values and behavior patterns: constant laziness, unwillingness to work and study, lack of will and fear of the real. peace.
Deprived of the need to fight for his desires, receiving everything he wants at the first request, Oblomov became accustomed to idleness. He did not need to decide or do anything on his own - there were always parents nearby who “knew better” what their son needed, or servants who were ready to bring him any food, help him get dressed or clean his chambers. Ilya was raised as an exotic “indoor flower,” protected with all their might from the outside world and hidden in Oblomovka’s peaceful nest. His parents did not even demand academic success from their son, since they did not consider science to be something truly important and useful; they often left him at home on holidays or in bad weather. That is why studying at school, and then at the institute, became for Oblomov something like an instruction from his parents, and not the implementation of his own will. Ilya Ilyich was bored in class; he did not understand how the knowledge gained could be applied in later life, in particular, in Oblomovka.
The destructive influence of fairy tales on Oblomov’s life
In the novel, Ilya Ilyich appears as a very sensitive, dreamy person who knows how to see beauty and subtly experience any manifestations of the outside world. In many ways, the formation of these qualities in the hero was influenced by Oblomov’s picturesque nature and fairy tales that his nanny told the boy. Myths and legends carried Oblomov into a completely different world - a fantastic, beautiful and full of miracles: “He involuntarily dreams of Militris Kirbityevna; everything pulls him in that direction, where they only know that they are walking, where there are no worries and sorrows; he always has the disposition to lie on the stove, walk around in a ready-made, unearned dress and eat at the expense of the good sorceress.” Even in adulthood, realizing that “rivers of milk” do not exist, Ilya Ilyich “is sometimes unconsciously sad, why is a fairy tale not life, and why is life not a fairy tale.” That is why in Oblomov, that sense of abandonment of a person in a terrifying and frightening world, instilled with fairy tales, continued to live in Oblomov, where you need to blindly make your way forward, neither seeing a goal nor a road, from which only a true miracle can save you.
Fairy, magical world legends and myths become an alternative reality for Oblomov, and already in adulthood he invents for himself a fairy tale about a future life in the paradise Oblomovka, about endless calm family happiness, well-being and tranquility. However, the tragedy of Ilya Ilyich does not even lie in total escapism, fear of society, unwillingness to do anything and fight for his happiness, and not the understanding that he has already replaced real life with an illusory one. Before his death, for Oblomov, his dreams are more real and important than his son, wife, friend and people around him, even more important than himself, because in his dreams everything is in order with his health, he is full of strength and energy. However, Goncharov himself in the novel briefly gives the reader one of the explanations for this substitution: “or maybe sleep, the eternal silence of a sluggish life and the absence of movement and any real fears, adventures and dangers forced a person to create another, unrealizable one among the natural world, and to look for revelry and fun for the idle imagination or the solution to ordinary combinations of circumstances and causes of a phenomenon outside the phenomenon itself,” emphasizing that life itself should be a continuous striving forward, and not an endless sleep in the “comfort zone.”
Conclusion
The concept of “Oblomovism” in the novel “Oblomov” is introduced by Goncharov not as a single characteristic of the life motives and characteristics of the protagonist’s nature, but as a typical and especially attractive phenomenon for Russian society - the archetype of Emelya the Fool, lying on the stove and waiting for his finest hour. According to the author himself, this is “an evil and insidious satire on our great-grandfathers, and maybe even on ourselves” - a fairy tale that everyone wants to believe in, but which has nothing to do with reality, where in order to achieve heights it is necessary to rise from ovens and work, work on yourself. Using Oblomov as an example, Goncharov showed how excessive care and guardianship, protection from stress and losses, leading to complete disappointment in life, can have a detrimental effect on a sensitive, dreamy person. real life and replacing it with illusions.
The characteristics of the concept of “Oblomovism”, the history of its appearance and the connection with the main character of the novel will be useful to 10th graders while preparing an essay on the topic “Oblomov and “Oblomovism” in the novel “Oblomov”.
Work test
I. A. Goncharov’s novel “Oblomov” was published in 1859, at a time when the issue of abolition of serfdom was extremely acute in the country, when Russian society was already fully aware of the destructiveness of the existing order. A deep knowledge of life and the accuracy of social analysis of characters allowed the writer to find a surprisingly correct definition of the way of Russian life of that time - “Oblomovism”.
The author's main task in the novel is to show how a person gradually dies in a person, how unadapted a landowner is to life, not accustomed to doing anything. The main qualities of the kind, sweet Ilya Ilyich Oblomov are his inertia, apathy, and aversion to any activity. True to the traditions of realism, I. A. Goncharov shows that these qualities were the result of Oblomov’s upbringing; they were born from the confidence that any of his desires would be fulfilled and no effort needed to be made for this. Oblomov is a nobleman, he does not have to work for a piece of bread - hundreds of Zakharov serfs work for him on the estate and completely ensure his existence. This means that he can lie on the couch all day long, not because he is tired, but because “this was his normal state.” He almost merged with his soft, comfortable robe and long, wide shoes, which he masterfully slipped into the first time, as soon as he dangled his feet from the sofa.
In his youth, Oblomov “was full of all sorts of aspirations, hopes, he expected a lot from fate and himself, he was always preparing for some field, for some role.” But time passed, and Ilya Ilyich kept getting ready, preparing to start a new life, but did not advance a single step towards any goal. In Moscow he received a good education, but his head “was like a library, consisting of only knowledge scattered in parts.” Entering the service, which had previously seemed to him in the form of some kind of family occupation, he did not even imagine that life would immediately be divided into two halves for him, one of which would consist of work and boredom, which for him were synonymous, and the other - from peace and peaceful fun. He realized that “it would take at least an earthquake to prevent a healthy person from coming to work,” and therefore he soon resigned, then stopped going out into the world and completely shut himself up in his room. If Oblomov recognizes some kind of work, it is only the work of the soul, since dozens of generations of his ancestors “endured labor as a punishment imposed on our forefathers, but they could not love, and where there was a chance, they always got rid of it, finding it possible and due."
There were moments in Oblomov’s life when he thought about the reasons that prompted him to lead such a life, when he asked himself the question: “Why am I like this?” In the climactic chapter of the novel “Oblomov’s Dream,” the writer answers this question. He creates a picture of provincial landowner life and shows how lazy hibernation gradually becomes the normal state of a person.
In a dream, Oblomov is transported to his parents’ estate Oblomovka, “to a blessed corner of the earth,” where there is “no sea, no high mountains, rocks, abysses, no dense forests - there is nothing grandiose, wild and gloomy.” An idyllic picture appears before us, a series of beautiful landscapes. “The annual circle is performed there correctly and calmly. Deep silence lies in the fields. Silence and peace of life also reign in the morals of the people in that region,” writes I. A. Goncharov. Oblomov sees himself as a little boy, striving to look into the unknown, ask more questions and get answers. But only caring for food becomes the first and main concern of life in Oblomovka. And the rest of the time is taken up by “some
an all-consuming, invincible dream,” which I. A. Goncharov makes a symbol that characterizes people like Oblomov, and which he calls “the true likeness of death.” From childhood, Ilya was accustomed to the fact that he did not have to do anything, that for any job there was “Vaska, Vanka, Zakharka,” and at some point he himself realized that it was “much calmer” this way. And therefore, all those “seeking manifestations of strength” in Ilyusha “turned inward and sank, withering away.” Such a life deprived the hero of the novel of any initiative and gradually turned him into a slave of his position, his habits, and even a slave of his servant Zakhar.
In his article “What is Oblomovism?” N.A. Dobrolyubov wrote: “Oblomov is not a stupid apathetic figure without aspirations and feelings, but a person who is also looking for something in life, thinking about something.” He is endowed with many positive qualities, and he is not stupid. There is a sad truth in his judgments - also a consequence of Russian life. What are all these Sudbinskys, Volkins, Penkovs striving for? Indeed, is it worth getting up from the couch for the sake of the petty fuss that his former comrades are busy with?
In the spirit of the tradition created by Russian writers, I. A. Goncharov subjects his hero to the greatest test - the test of love. A feeling for Olga Ilyinskaya, a girl of enormous spiritual strength, could resurrect Oblomov. But I. A. Goncharov is a realist, and he cannot show a happy ending to the novel. “Why did everything die? Who cursed you, Ilya? What ruined you? - Olga bitterly tries to understand. And the writer gives the answer to these questions, absolutely precisely defining the name of this evil - Oblomovism. And Ilya Ilyich was not the only one who became her victim. "Our name is legion!" - he says to Stolz. And indeed, almost all the heroes of the novel were amazed by the “Oblomovism”; almost all the heroes of the novel became its victims: Zakhar, Agafya Pshenitsyna, Stolz, and Olga.
The greatest merit of I. A. Goncharov is that he surprisingly accurately depicted the disease that struck Russian society in the mid-19th century, which N. A. Dobrolyubov characterized as “the inability to actively want something,” and pointed out the social causes of this phenomenon.
I. A. Goncharov’s novel “Oblomov” was published in 1859, at a time when the issue of abolition of serfdom was extremely acute in the country, when Russian society was already fully aware of the destructiveness of the existing order. A deep knowledge of life and the accuracy of social analysis of characters allowed the writer to find a surprisingly correct definition of the way of Russian life of that time - Oblomovism.
The action of "Oblomov" covers, at intervals, the period of time from 1819 (when Ilyusha was 7 years old) to 1856. The actual action of the novel takes place over eight years, while counting its “prehistory” and “posthistory” - thirty-seven years. Until then, no Russian novel had covered such a wide span of time. A person's entire life has passed before us. And along with it, in Oblomov, the processes of great historical period, an entire era of Russian life.(3)
Goncharov researched and revealed in artistic images the origin of Oblomovism, its development and destructive influence on human personality. It was this sociological “monographic nature” that distinguished “Oblomov” from a number of works similar to it in theme: “Childhood” and “Adolescence” by Tolstoy, “Family Chronicle” by Aksakov - and to some extent brought “Oblomov” closer to such works of Shchedrin as “Poshekhon Antiquity” and especially “Messrs. Golovlevs”. (27)
This novel resolves a broad, universal psychological problem that could arise only in purely Russian, national phenomena, possible only with our way of life, under those historical circumstances that shaped folk character, under the conditions under the influence of which our younger generation developed and is still partly developing. The author touches on vital issues and shortcomings of society in order to show the full picture of life as it is, and a person with his feelings, thoughts and passions. Complete objectivity, calm, dispassionate creativity, the absence of narrow temporary goals and lyrical impulses that violate the clarity and distinctness of the epic narrative - this is distinctive features Goncharov's talent. His thought, carried out in the novel, belongs to all centuries and peoples, but has special meaning for Russian society. The author decided to trace the deadening, destructive influence that mental apathy and sleep have on a person, which little by little takes possession of all the forces of the soul, embracing and fettering all the best, human, rational movements and feelings. This apathy is a universal human phenomenon, it is expressed in the most diverse forms and is generated by the most diverse causes; but plays in it everywhere main role terrible question: “Why live? Why bother? - a question to which a person often cannot find a satisfactory answer. This unresolved question, this unsatisfied doubt, drains strength and ruins activity. A person gives up and gives up work without finding a goal for it. One will throw away the work with indignation and bile, the other will put it aside quietly and lazily. One will break out of his inaction, be indignant at himself and at people, look for something with which to fill the inner emptiness, his apathy will take on a shade of gloomy despair and will be interspersed with feverish impulses to disorderly activity, but it will remain apathy, because which will take away his strength to act, feel and live. For another, indifference to life will be expressed in a softer, colorless form, animal instincts will quietly float to the surface of the soul, the highest aspirations will freeze without pain, the person will sink into a soft chair and fall asleep, enjoying his meaningless peace. Instead of life, vegetation will begin and stagnant water will form in the human soul, which will not be touched by any disturbance of the external world, which will not be disturbed by any internal revolution. In the first case, it is forced apathy. At the same time, we are seeing a struggle against it, an excess of forces asking for action and slowly fading away in fruitless attempts. This is Byronism, a disease of strong people. In the second case, we are dealing with submissive apathy, peaceful, smiling, without the desire to get out of inaction. This is Oblomovism, as Goncharov himself called it, a disease whose development is promoted by both Slavic nature and the entire life of our society. It was precisely this kind of apathy, its development, that Goncharov described in the novel and showed with incredible accuracy, tracing it from origins to completion. (1)
The entire plan of the novel is constructed according to this idea in such a deliberate manner. There is not a single accident in it, not a single introductory person, not a single unnecessary detail. Everything is strictly natural and, at the same time, quite meaningful, imbued with an idea; there are almost no events or actions. The content of a novel can be told in two or three lines, just as the life of any person who has not experienced strong shocks can be told in a few words. The interest of such a novel, the interest of such a life, lies not in the intricate combination of events, but in observing the inner world of a person. This world is always interesting, always attracts attention, and is especially accessible for study in quiet moments, when the person who is the subject of our observation is left to himself, does not depend on external events, and is not placed in an artificial position resulting from a random coincidence of circumstances. In such quiet moments of life, a person concentrates, collects his thoughts and looks into his inner world. It is then that an invisible, silent internal struggle occurs, a thought matures and develops, or a turn to the past occurs, an assessment of one’s own actions, one’s own personality. Such mysterious moments, especially dear to the artist, are especially interesting to the enlightened observer. In Goncharov's novel, inner life characters open before the reader's eyes. (3)
Ilya Ilyich Oblomov, the hero of the novel, personifies that mental apathy to which Goncharov gave the name Oblomovism. The word Oblomovism will not die in our literature: it is composed so successfully and so tangibly characterizes one of the significant vices of our Russian life that, in all likelihood, from literature it will penetrate into the language and come into general use (1).
To understand the essence of Oblomovism and describe the life of Ilya Ilyich, Goncharov skillfully describes first everything that surrounded the main character, his place of life, his parents, who symbolically act as guides in the novel. (9.24)
Oblomovka was depicted by Goncharov with amazing completeness and versatility. He showed the isolation and closedness of this social environment: “their interests were focused on themselves, did not intersect or come into contact with anyone else.” Oblomovka appeared before us in its silence and “in imperturbable calm,” so characteristic of this patriarchal outback. The inhabitants of Oblomovka were characterized by the undivided power of tradition: “The norm of life was ready and taught to them by their parents, and they accepted it, also ready from their grandfather, and grandfather from their great-grandfather, with a covenant to preserve its value and inviolability.” Patriarchal Oblomovka is the kingdom of laziness. Here live people whose souls “sank peacefully, without interference, into a soft body” (10)
When analyzing the chapter “Oblomov’s Dream”, Goncharov’s position in relation to the “ideal of calm and inaction”, as the main character of the novel imagines the existence of the inhabitants of Oblomovka, clearly becomes clear. It is not without reason that in Oblomovka’s description the images of sleep and death are not only endlessly repeated but also equated to each other, for peace and quiet serve as characteristics of both “twins”, as she called these states human soul Tyutchev F.I.:
“everything there promises a peaceful, long-term life until the hair turns yellow and an imperceptible death like a dream”
“Everything in the village is quiet and sleepy... It will be in vain to call loudly: dead silence will be the answer.”
“Dead silence reigned in the house. The time for everyone's afternoon nap has arrived."
“In Oblomovka everyone rests so soundly and peacefully”
Moreover, symbolic designations of life and death often collide in context:
“everything promises a peaceful, long-term life there”
"life is like a calm river"
“three main acts of life - homeland, weddings and funerals”
"sleep, the eternal silence of a sluggish life"
The concepts of life, death, sleep, peace, peace, silence - essentially do not have independent characteristics, and these states themselves are no different for Oblomovites. “Sleepy Oblomovka is an afterlife, this is the absolute peace of a person...”
Oblomovism, according to Goncharov himself, corrupted not only the landowner class, but also a certain part of the Russian peasants, who were torn away from productive work. The Oblomovs' servants inevitably became a type of boibak - that's exactly what they were life path Zahara. Zakhar is the same inert person as Oblomov, but if in the former this trait is dramatic, here it became only comic: Zakhar’s consciousness did not suffer from inertia at all. Everything that Oblomov is clothed in the poetic attire of a “dream” appeared in Zakhar in all its prosaic nakedness
However, a comprehensive display of Oblomovka was not a goal, but a means. The focus of his attention was the fate of the boy raised in this well-fed and inert environment. Goncharov's novel amazes us with the depth of penetration into the spiritual world of Ilyusha Oblomov. With the skill of a true psychologist, Goncharov posed the problem of the destructive impact of the reactionary environment on a living and inquisitive child, in whom it, however, fostered anemia, an inability to live and act.
Oblomovka broke the will of the person it raised. Oblomov admits this, telling Stoltz: “I know everything, I understand everything, but there is no strength and will. Give me your will and mind and guide me (10).
The author's main task in the novel is to show how a person gradually dies in a person, how unadapted a landowner is to life, not accustomed to doing anything. The main qualities of the kind, sweet Ilya Ilyich Oblomov are his inertia, apathy, and aversion to any activity. True to the traditions of realism, I. A. Goncharov shows that these qualities were the result of Oblomov’s upbringing; they were born from the confidence that any of his desires would be fulfilled and no effort needed to be made for this. Oblomov is a nobleman, he does not have to work for a piece of bread - hundreds of Zakharov serfs work for him on the estate and completely ensure his existence.
This means that he can lie on the sofa all day long, not because he is tired, but because “this was his normal state.” He almost merged with his soft, comfortable robe and long, wide shoes, which he masterfully slipped into the first time, as soon as he dangled his feet from the sofa. (27)
In his youth, Oblomov “was full of all sorts of aspirations, hopes, he expected a lot from fate and himself, he was always preparing for some field, for some role.” (10) But time passed, and Ilya Ilyich kept getting ready, preparing to start a new life, but did not advance a single step towards any goal. In Moscow he received a good education, but his head “was like a library, consisting of only knowledge scattered in parts.” Entering the service, which had previously seemed to him in the form of some kind of family occupation, he did not even imagine that life would immediately be divided into two halves for him, one of which would consist of work and boredom, which for him were synonymous, and the other - from peace and peaceful fun. He realized that “it would take at least an earthquake to prevent a healthy person from coming to work,” and therefore he soon resigned, then stopped going out into the world and completely shut himself up in his room. If Oblomov recognizes some kind of work, it is only the work of the soul, since dozens of generations of his ancestors “endured labor as a punishment imposed on our forefathers, but they could not love, and where there was a chance, they always got rid of it, finding it possible and due."
There were moments in Oblomov’s life when he thought about the reasons that prompted him to lead such a life, when he asked himself the question: “Why am I like this?” In the climactic chapter of the novel “Oblomov’s Dream,” the writer answers this question. (1, 17)
He creates a picture of provincial landowner life and shows how lazy hibernation gradually becomes the normal state of a person.
The chapter “Oblomov’s Dream” has independent meaning. In the preface to the novel, literary critic V.I. Kuleshov writes: “Goncharov decided to insert the previously published “Oblomov’s Dream” in its entirety, giving it a kind of symbolic meaning. As part of the novel “Oblomov,” this early essay began to play the role of a preliminary story, an important message about the hero’s childhood... The reader receives important information, thanks to what kind of upbringing the hero of the novel became a couch potato. Since lazy hibernation became “the hero’s lifestyle and more than once dreams appeared to him, dreams that transported him to the world of dreams, imaginary kingdoms, then “Oblomov’s Dream” turned out to be natural for him. His unique presence with a special title in the composition of the novel acquired a certain symbolic meaning, giving the reader the opportunity to realize where and in what way this life “broke off.” But that's not all there is to a great episode.
From a medical point of view, such long and clear dreams do not exist, and Goncharov did not have the task of describing a real dream. Here the dream is a dream, it is conditional, and also logically constructed.
Chapter IX of the novel, entitled “Oblomov’s Dream,” shows an idyll of childhood. Childhood is a special page of Russian classical literature, soulful, poetic; The joys and sorrows of a child learning the world, nature, and himself were described by S. T. Aksakov, L. N. Tolstoy, A. N. Tolstoy, V. V. Nabokov. We can say that the theme of childhood is nostalgic, especially in Nabokov, for whom childhood is also the lost homeland that he carries within himself.
In a dream, Oblomov is transported to his parents’ estate Oblomovka, “to a blessed corner of the earth,” where there is “no sea, no high mountains, rocks, abysses, no dense forests - there is nothing grandiose, wild and gloomy.” An idyllic picture appears before us, a series of beautiful landscapes. “The annual circle is performed there correctly and calmly. Deep silence lies in the fields. Silence and calm of life also reign in the morals of the people in that region,” writes Goncharov. Oblomov sees himself as a little boy, striving to look into the unknown, ask more questions and get answers. But only caring for food becomes the first and main concern of life in Oblomovka. And the rest of the time is occupied by “some kind of all-consuming, invincible dream,” which Goncharov makes a symbol characterizing people like Oblomov, and which he calls “the true likeness of death.” From childhood, Ilya was accustomed to the fact that he did not have to do anything, that for any job there was “Vaska, Vanka, Zakharka,” and at some point he himself realized that it was “much calmer” this way. And therefore, all those “seeking manifestations of strength” in Ilyusha “turned inward and sank, withering away.” Such a life deprived the hero of the novel of any initiative and gradually turned him into a slave of his position, his habits, and even a slave of his servant Zakhar.
Ilyusha Oblomov has everything that is typical of a normal child: liveliness, curiosity. “He passionately wants to run up to the hanging gallery that goes around the whole house...” “With joyful amazement, as if for the first time, he looked around and ran around his parents’ house...” “His childish mind observes all the phenomena taking place in front of him; they sink deep into his soul, then grow and mature with him.” And the nanny? There is always a nanny who tells fairy tales. And here are the significant words: “...his fairy tale is mixed with life, and he sometimes unconsciously feels sad, why is a fairy tale not life, and why is life not a fairy tale.” Here, in childhood, everything that will remain with him until his death is already laid down.
Idyll local life, peace, sweet sleep, frozen life, the sleep of all Oblomovka... How did they understand life in Oblomovka? " Good people they understood it only as an ideal of peace and inaction, disturbed from time to time by various troubles, such as illness, losses, quarrels and, among other things, labor. They endured labor as a punishment imposed on our forefathers, but they could not love...” And death here was like an imperceptible transition from a state of sleep to eternal sleep. But there is also endless charm in this idyll.
“The annual circle was completed there correctly and calmly.” Nature itself, soft, calm, where there are no mountains, but only hills that smoothly turn into plains, embodies “deep silence and peace.” “Silence and imperturbable calm reign in the morals of people.” In all this there is both joy and... death. No matter how much charm and poetry these paintings contain, they are about frozen time.
The adult Ilya Ilyich Oblomov would like to live in this frozen time. He sighs heavily when “life gets to him.”
Oblomov's dream plays an important role in the novel compositional role. Starting from Chapter II, Goncharov brings visitors to Oblomov’s apartment. Volkov, a narcissistic dandy who needs to get into “ten places.” “Ten places in one day - unfortunate! - thought Oblomov. - And this is life!.. Where is the person here? What does it crush and crumble into?” And Oblomov rejoices, “turning over on his back, that he does not have such empty desires and thoughts, that he does not rush around, but lies here, maintaining his human dignity and his peace.” The next visitor is Sudbinsky, a former colleague of Oblomov who has made a career. “I got stuck, dear friend, I got stuck up to my ears... And when he comes out into the world, he will eventually manage his affairs and grab ranks... And how little a person needs here: his mind, his will, his feelings...” Next comes the writer Penkin. Oblomov’s conclusion after Penkin’s departure: “Yes, write everything, waste your thought, your soul on trifles... trade in your mind and imagination... know no peace... When to stop and rest? Unhappy!" A man without qualities arrives, no one even knows his last name for sure: either Ivanov, or Vasilyev, or Alekseev, who is also fussing, always calling Oblomov somewhere. Finally, Ilya Ilyich’s fellow countryman, Tarantiev, appears, a personality no less vain than the others. He is a master at talking, he makes a lot of noise, but he is not enough for action.
A doctor comes for a visit and gives practical advice to Oblomov: move more, walk “eight hours a day.” After all, Ilya Ilyich had already developed early obesity.
Without accepting all these empty activities (chasing a career, money, social entertainment), Oblomov subjects himself to a “secret confession” and comes to the conclusion that “some secret enemy laid a heavy hand on him at the beginning of his journey...”. His thoughts ended with the fact that “sleep stopped the slow and lazy flow of his thoughts.”
“Oblomov’s Dream” explains why the path of his visitors is unacceptable for Ilya Ilyich. A dream separates these visits from the arrival of Stolz, who played a huge role in Oblomov’s life.
With difficulty, at the beginning of five o'clock, Oblomov comes out of sleep, and then, like a fresh wind from the outside, Stolz bursts in. He has nothing in common with previous visitors. Stolz is honest, smart, active. He sincerely wants to bring Oblomov out of hibernation. But it turned out that his childhood friend Stolz also does not know the true purpose of life, and his activities are largely mechanical. Oblomov, in essence, realizing that Stolz sincerely wants to help him, turns out to be unable to join life, to go his own way, and Stolz’s activities are not for him. However, the arrival of Stolz brought Oblomov out of his immobility, as if giving him a chance. Oblomov seemed to come to life when he fell in love with Olga. But even here he saved.
Oblomov's days end with Vasilyevsky Island at Pshenitsyna's. This is also a kind of Oblomovka, but without the feeling of the poetry of childhood, nature, or the expectation of a miracle. Almost imperceptibly our hero passes into his eternal sleep.
What is the reason that Oblomov’s possibilities were not realized? internal forces left unused? Of course, it is rooted in Oblomovka. “Oblomov’s Dream” explains why he did not want and could not follow either the path of the early visitors or the path of Stolz: Ilya Ilyich had neither a specific goal nor the energy to implement it. Thus, Oblomov’s dream is, as it were, the focus of the novel.
In his article “What is Oblomovism?” N.A. Dobrolyubov wrote “Oblomov is not a stupid apathetic figure without aspirations and feelings, but a person who is also looking for something in life, thinking about something.” (17) He is endowed with many positive qualities, and he is not stupid. There is a sad truth in his judgments - also a consequence of Russian life. What are all these Sudbinskys, Volkins, Penkovs striving for? Indeed, is it worth getting up from the couch for the sake of the petty fuss that his former comrades are busy with?
In the extremely simple plot of “Oblomov”, which did not shine with any external effects, Dobrolyubov saw deep social content. He wrote: “Apparently, Goncharov did not choose a vast sphere for his own. The story of how the good-natured sloth Oblomov lies and sleeps, and how neither friendship nor love can awaken and raise him, is not God knows what an important story. But it reflects Russian life, in it a living, modern Russian type appears before us, minted with merciless severity and truthfulness; it expressed a new word for our social development, pronounced clearly and firmly, without despair and without childish hopes, but with a full consciousness of the truth. This word - “Oblomovism”, serves as the key to unraveling many phenomena of Russian life and it gives Goncharov’s novel much more public importance, than how many of our accusatory stories have it. In the type of Oblomov and in all this “Oblomovism” we see something more than just successful creation strong talent; we find in it a work of Russian life, a sign of the times.” (17)
Turning to the image of Oblomov, Dobrolyubov shrewdly saw the source of his life drama partly in Oblomov’s external position, partly “in the image of his mental and moral development" Dobrolyubov saw in Oblomov an image of those “supposedly talented natures” whom they had previously admired “before they covered themselves with different robes, adorned themselves with different hairstyles, and attracted people with different talents. But now Oblomov appears before us exposed as he is, silent, brought down from a beautiful pedestal onto a soft sofa, covered instead of a robe only with a spacious robe. The question is what does he do? What is the meaning and purpose of his life? - delivered directly and clearly, not filled with any side questions.” (27)
Oblomov was destroyed by serfdom, lordly upbringing and the entire system of Russian landowner life, which slowly but surely turned this man out of life, turning him into “a warehouse filled with all sorts of rubbish.” (18)
The antithesis of Obolomova is Andrei Ivanovich Stolts. He is introduced into the novel to emphasize Oblomov’s character, to show the difference between them; without him, the picture of Oblomovism would not be complete, so we will not ignore Stolz.
Andrei Ivanovich Stolts is such a person as there were very few in that society. He was not spoiled by home education; from a young age he began to enjoy reasonable freedom, learned life early and was able to bring solid theoretical knowledge into practical activity.
Elaboration of convictions, strength of will, a critical view of people and life, as well as faith in truth and goodness, respect for everything beautiful and sublime - these are the main character traits of Stolz.
It was after analyzing the two heroes of the novel that we saw a clear difference.
In conclusion of this part of the diploma, I would like to summarize what Oblomovism really is, what its place is in Goncharov’s work and the life of a Russian person.
Let us turn to the words of Gorky, who wrote that the generalizing power of the image created by Goncharov is enormous “... in the person of Oblomov we have before us the most truthful image of the nobility” (16). Oblomovites are not only small provincial nobility, this is all the Russian nobility of that time, which was experiencing a process of deep, social and moral crisis. Oblomov is the broadest image in its range, covering the entire noble-landowner class, a synthesis of the most significant features of its psyche and, above all, deep inertia, convinced bigotry. In the fate of Oblomov, the process of degradation and degeneration of the serf system with its characteristic features of savagery and stagnation was shown with exhaustive completeness. Oblomov is the personification of the entire landowner way of life on the eve of the 60s.
