Information garbage is being inserted into the minds of Russian teenagers, replacing the moral values and practices familiar to Russian people. There is a decline in morals and a consistent dullness of the younger generation.
In Russia, words previously considered shameful, alas, are already spoken on air as a matter of norm.
Watching any of the programs or series on the most popular Russian, if you can call it that, TV channel “TNT” imposes on the average person the understanding that “intimate relationships without love and outside marriage are a common occurrence”, “tests and exams can be passed for a bribe, study there’s no point”, “a real man is one who is very popular with girls and can drag anyone into bed”, “swearing and swearing are a natural attribute of communication for a Russian person”, “down with moral values and fidelity in marriage", "vulgarity and debauchery are a common occurrence for 16-year-old teenagers in Russia, and those who are not like that are losers", "having children is not fashionable."
And, finally, the most basic, carefully pushed line of propaganda on the TNT channel is to introduce into the consciousness of society the concepts: “an Armenian in the life of a Russian person is the norm”, “Armenians are the solution to all Russian problems”, “Armenians are smarter, stronger and more brutal”, “Armenians can be trusted, they will not deceive”... Such a policy of this channel is explained by the fact that the Armenian factor prevails in the management of TNT, as, indeed, in a number of other leading media outlets in the Russian Federation.
Modern Armenians, who have long taken root and successfully realized themselves in Russia, are trying to destroy the stereotype established from the past: at one time, the great Russian poets Pushkin, Yesenin, the historian Velichko and others noted in their works completely different qualities of Armenians... But that is in the past.
Today, representatives of the Armenian ethnic group occupy main positions in the Russian media, very skillfully taking advantage of this modern instrument mass influence in their own interests, presented as “Russian”.
Finally, in a number of Russian media, which the hand of the Armenian diaspora still failed, or did not have time to reach, they sound the alarm about this, noting: “Such television dulls the youth, imposes values alien to their native culture, replaces the right with the wrong and leads to large-scale duping and dumbing down of young people, and not only. Think about what kind of information garbage your children are absorbing. Don’t let these Armenian media giants take over your brain!”
It would be interesting to ask the leaders of the TNT television channel - what is the point of their activities, other than making money by undermining the foundations of society, corrupting the younger generation, and creating unhealthy idols? Why, for example, in “House-2” they show how to “build relationships” by changing sexual partners like gloves, and say nothing about sexually transmitted diseases, the dangers of promiscuity and maiden honor? What do they want to instill in Russian children? Sleep with just anyone, give birth to visiting young men and completely forget about morality? Why is homosexuality promoted?
And here’s what Russian bloggers write: “Many people scold America, saying that all this came from there. Maybe. However, I recently spoke with a former classmate who left for America a long time ago. He flew to Moscow on business. We remembered student years, they talked about how Moscow had changed, and he said the following phrase: I’m simply horrified by your television. What should happen in a society where everyone is watching?"
This trend of using the media as a "weapon of mass intellectual destruction" will continue as long as Russian leadership They don't realize the scale of the problem...
What should come first in a person's life? How can a person be characterized by his chosen goal? These are the questions that arise when reading D.S. Likhachev’s text.
Commenting on the problem of true and false values in life, the author relies on his own thoughts. He believes that a worthy person is distinguished by his goals and aspirations - in the first place for such a person are goodness, humanity, and compassion. And the one who sees the meaning of his whole life in buying a more expensive car, a more luxurious house, gives the impression of a base, unspiritual person.
It should be dictated by kindness towards people, love for family, for your city, for your people, for your country, for the whole universe.”
It is impossible to disagree with the author's position. If a person strives to do good deeds, live with love for one’s neighbor and for the Fatherland, his life will be filled with joy, happiness, and the awareness that he has brought benefit to the world. By purchasing only material goods, a person will never be happy, he will always lack something. In the endless pursuit of material wealth, he will be devastated morally and spiritually.
Let's try to prove the correctness of our judgments by turning to literary argument. Let us recall the story of I.A. Bunin “The Gentleman from San Francisco”. The main character devoted his entire life to his career and acquiring capital. Finally, he decides to go on a cruise trip with his family. In an expensive hotel in Capri, reading a newspaper, he suddenly dies. In order not to spoil the reputation of the establishment, the manager orders the body of the deceased old man to be moved in a soda box to the service room. And then the dead man floats in the hold of the ship Atlantis back to America, completing the earthly circle of life. With the death of the gentleman from San Francisco, nothing changed in the world; no one except his family grieved for his passing. This man served false values, saw the meaning of life in earning money in order to have the right to a luxurious vacation and entertainment.
Let's look at another literary example. In the story by A.P. Chekhov “Ionych” main character degrades as a person when the goal of his life is to accumulate money and buy houses. At first, Dmitry Ionych Startsev, a zemstvo doctor, walks around and falls in love with the daughter of the Turkins, whose family is considered to be provincial town S. the most talented. Having received a refusal from Ekaterina Ivanovna to propose marriage, Startsev quickly calms down. He gets a private practice in the city, money, his own troika, carriage, coachman Panteleimon. Ionych’s favorite pastime is counting rainbow-colored pieces of paper, which he takes out of his pocket in the evenings. So gradually the zemstvo doctor loses his humanity and turns into an idol.
Thus, we are convinced that when choosing a goal in life, a person thus evaluates himself. If he chooses material goods, then he can be assessed as the owner of a car or a summer house, nothing more. If he strives to do good to others, he evaluates himself at the level of humanity.
What are the main values of a person? Why do people sometimes make mistakes in their choices? Author of this text raises the issue of true and false values.
Yu. Nagibin gives a monologue of the hero, who speaks about the main values of a person. The author argues that the attitude towards the heroic should not be subject to fashion, since everything depends on moral qualities a person hiding under the outer “shell”. Sometimes people are mistaken in their choice, but they are still filled with a sense of striving for the best, because true values can never become outdated.
The author does not directly show his point of view, but gradually leads the reader to the idea that kindness, sincerity, activity, ability to work, determination, courage are the most important qualities that a person should have.
I completely agree with the author’s opinion that vital activity and ability to work can “pull” a person out of a difficult situation. Suffice it to recall Leo Tolstoy’s novel “Anna Karenina”. Konstantin Levin, after receiving Katya Shcherbatskaya’s refusal to marry him, goes to live in the village. He went with the men to the fields to mow grass, despite the fact that he was a gentleman. Severely tired, Levin still received great satisfaction from this work.
This suggests that Konstantin Dmitrievich chose work instead of eking out a miserable existence.
Next literary example, it seems to me, is another argument. Let's remember L.N. Tolstoy's epic novel "War and Peace". For the Kuragin family main value there was money in life, so both Anatole and Helen grew up selfish. In the Rostov house everything was the other way around: in their family everything was built on love and mutual understanding. Therefore, Natasha, Nikolai and Petya grew up kind and sympathetic. Thus, the Kuragins chose false values, and the Rostovs chose true ones.
Based on all of the above, I will emphasize once again: it is important to make your choice correctly and distinguish the false from the true.
What is “value substitution”? give an example and got the best answer
Reply from Maxim Diamonds[guru]
For example, when Stalin said that he was an apprentice...
(the reason is that it is more desirable to manipulate society in..
your own interests)
Reply from Od-Dentist[guru]
the fact that we value this life and all worldly values higher than the Kingdom of Heaven! Do you often think about your death? ??And this is precisely what gives Life Meaning! No wonder in prayer they ask God to give “mortal memory”! That is, a person lives and remembers his death and acts in such a way that later he can justify himself Last Judgment. But we are used to living and grabbing, grabbing.... “take everything from life” and so on. This is the substitution of values
Reply from language[guru]
a priceless gift... and they give you a fucking coffee grinder...
Reply from Galyak Alfovich[guru]
Well, let’s say that the Modern Russian language has lost its original meaning, many words are used completely different from their original meaning. This is a substitution of values. and the main thing is that this is done unnoticed, gradually displacing from the consciousness and memory of people what was originally... .
For what? ?
To make it easier to manipulate.
Reply from Just Slavik[guru]
When the original is replaced with a fake.
For what? For selfish purposes, pursuing personal interests, profit.
Reply from Alexander Babich[guru]
religious instead of virtuous
Assignment: Write an essay based on the text you read.
(1) The old village with its thousand-year history is disappearing into oblivion today. (2) And this means that centuries-old foundations are collapsing, that centuries-old soil on which all of ours has grown is disappearing. national culture: its ethics and aesthetics, its folklore and literature, its miracle language. (3) The village is our origins, our roots. (4) The village is the material womb where our national character. (5) And today, when the old village is living out its last days, we look with new, special, heightened attention at the type of person that was created by her, we look at our mothers and fathers, grandfathers and grandmothers. (6) Oh, they had a few kind words! (7) But it is on them, on the shoulders of these nameless workers and warriors, that the building of our entire life today stands firmly! (8) Let us recall, for example, only one feat of a Russian woman in the last war. (9) After all, it was she, the Russian woman, who, with her superhuman work, opened the second front back in forty-one, the front that she had been waiting for so much Soviet Army. (10) And how, by what measure to measure the feat of the same Russian woman in the post-war period, in those times when she, often hungry, naked and barefoot, fed and clothed the country, with the true patience and resignation of a Russian peasant woman she bore her heavy cross as a widow -soldiers, mothers of sons killed in the war! (11) So is it surprising that the old peasant woman in our literature has temporarily pushed aside, and sometimes even overshadowed, other characters? (12) Let's remember " Matrenin Dvor"A. Solzhenitsyn, "The Last Term of V. Rasputin, the heroines of V. Shukshin, A. Astafiev and V. Belov. (13) No, this is not an idealization of village life and not a longing for the fading hut-like Rus', as some critics and writers broadcast with thoughtless ease and arrogance, but our filial, albeit belated, gratitude. (14) This is the desire to comprehend and retain the spiritual experience of people of the older generation, that moral potential, those moral forces that did not allow Russia to collapse during the years of the most difficult trials. (15) Yes, these heroines are dark and illiterate, yes, naive and overly trusting, but what spiritual treasures, what spiritual light! (16) Endless dedication, a keen Russian conscience and sense of duty, the ability for self-restraint and compassion, love for work, for the land and for all living things - you can’t list everything. (17) Unfortunately, a modern young man, raised in other, more favorable conditions, does not always inherit these vital qualities. (18)And one of the most important tasks modern literature - to warn young people against the danger of spiritual hardening, to help them assimilate and enrich the spiritual baggage accumulated by previous generations. (19)V lately we talk a lot about preserving the natural environment and monuments material culture. (20) Isn’t it time to raise the issue of safety and protection with the same energy and pressure? lasting values spiritual culture accumulated over centuries people's experience... (According to F.A. Abramov)
Answer:
The text by F.A. Abramov proposed for analysis is devoted to the problem of mental hardening. Modern man Lately, it has been inheriting far from those values that are, in fact, vitally important. But previous generations had them: endless dedication, a heightened Russian conscience, a sense of duty, the ability for self-restraint and compassion, love for work, for the land and for all living things.
The author believes that it is time to raise the question of the preservation and protection of the enduring values of spiritual culture accumulated by centuries of folk experience. F. Abramov suggests remembering the nameless workers, on whose shoulders the building of “our entire life today” rests! Fyodor Aleksandrovich is sure that one of the most important tasks of literature is to warn people against spiritual hardening and help them enrich their spiritual baggage.
But in my opinion modern generation becomes callous mentally. Young people now are angry and do not give kindness to the people around them. People began to forget about real spiritual values. How can you have a heart-to-heart talk with a person if there is no soul, but only selfish calculations? Only with kind, gentle and fair people can you truly make friends.
In the work of F.M. Dostoevsky's "Crime and Punishment" in St. Petersburg, against the backdrop of dirt and stuffiness, events take place that depict the loss human values. In the scene with the drowned woman, the author shows how the vast majority of onlookers curiously look at the drunk woman only for the purpose of having fun. This crowd has no compassion. Witnesses to Marmeladov’s death behave in the same way: some say that the drunk himself threw himself under the carriage, others claim that the coachman was flying quickly.
Kindness in a person must be cultivated from childhood. This feeling should be an integral part of the personality. For example, in L.N. Tolstoy’s work “War and Peace,” Natasha Rostova was kind from childhood, she was raised that way. She had a natural charm, lived life to the fullest, inner beauty. Natasha is very responsive to the point of self-forgetfulness, she is a loving daughter and caring sister. It is very difficult to characterize a person with such qualities in our time.
To summarize, I want to say that it is necessary to cultivate kindness, responsiveness, honesty, and selflessness in the younger generation. If all people eventually become kind and fair, then everyone’s life will become happy. Then there will be harmony in our world!
