As a manuscript
Medvedev Vladislav Valentinovich
SETTLEMENTS AND HOUSINGS OF CHUVASH BASHKORTOSTAN
SECOND HALF OF THE XIX – BEGINNING OF THE XX CENTURY
Specialty 07.00.07 – Ethnography, ethnology, anthropology
dissertations for competition scientific degree
candidate of historical sciences
Izhevsk – 2012
The work was carried out at the Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Professional Education "Magnitogorsk State University"
Scientific supervisor: Candidate of Historical Sciences Atnagulov Irek Ravilevich
Official opponents: Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor Shutova Nadezhda Ivanovna Candidate of Historical Sciences Matveev Georgy Borisovich
Leading organization: Institute of Ethnological Research Ufa scientific center RAS
The defense will take place on February 28, 2012 at 13.00 at a meeting of the dissertation council DM 212.275.01 at the Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Professional Education "Udmurt State University" at the address: 426034, Izhevsk, st.
Universitetskaya, 1, bldg. 2, room. _
Scientific secretary of the dissertation council, candidate of historical sciences, associate professor G.N. Zhuravleva
GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF WORK
Relevance research. Settlements and dwellings are an integral part of the material culture of an ethnic group. Along with the power supply system and traditional costume the organization of living space is leading in the structure of people's life support. Rural settlements can be considered as a set of peasant estates, united into a whole community and interconnected by various relationships: family ties, common economic activities, joint land use and ownership of forest lands, hay meadows, and water resources.The study of the formation of various types of settlements - villages, hamlets, hamlets and other points - helps to create a clear picture of understanding the socio-economic situation of the Chuvash peasantry in the second half of the 19th - early 20th centuries. in Bashkiria. In the process of considering the history of the emergence of settlements, the reasons, course of migration, ethnic composition new settlements, economic activities.
The central component of the peasant household was the residential complex.
Its location in relation to the outside world, relative to outbuildings, building materials and structures, construction techniques - all these parameters deserve careful study and analysis.
Nowadays, the appearance of settlements is changing. Traditional buildings and dwellings are being destroyed and their complete disappearance is soon possible.
This fact actualizes the need for collecting and theoretically understanding information about the dwellings and economic buildings of the Chuvash people of Bashkortostan.
The object of the study is a group of Chuvash living on the territory of Bashkiria, the subject is rural settlements, buildings and dwellings of the Chuvash of Bashkortostan.
The chronological scope of the study is limited to the second half of the 19th – early 20th centuries, although many aspects are covered in a longer historical retrospective. For comparison, materials of more recent origin are also used. The lower time limit is the second half of the 19th century. – determined by the fact that in this period, in connection with the reform of 1861, migrations of peasants from European Russia to free lands, including Bashkiria, are intensifying. The development of infrastructure, trade, and the stratification of the peasantry led to significant changes in the appearance of settlements, affecting, among other things, traditional architecture.
The upper limit can be considered the beginning of the 20th century, when the process of migration of the Chuvash to Bashkiria was completed and elements of ethnic culture functioned among the population, for example, buildings, dwellings, which soon underwent transformation and then partial disappearance.
The territorial scope of the study is defined within the natural geographical boundaries of the eastern part of the Russian Plain - the Urals, the Southern Urals, the Trans-Urals - covering the territory of modern Bashkiria.
Historically, the Chuvash settled within the western, southwestern, central and southern regions of modern Bashkiria. The study pays special attention to the Chuvash settlements of the Southern zone, as the least studied. Modern Chuvash villages in the south of Bashkiria are localized in Zilairsky, Zianchurinsky, Kugarchinsky, Kuyurgazinsky, Meleuzovsky and Khaibullinsky districts.
Degree of knowledge problems. Quite a lot of scientific works devoted to the settlements, dwellings and outbuildings of the Chuvash have been published. However, the majority of them belong to the population of the metropolis, while the Chuvash of various ethno-territorial groups have still not been fully studied. In this regard, the presented historiographical review will reflect works related to the Chuvash of Bashkiria and containing direct or indirect information about this group.
According to the generally accepted gradation in the historiography of the problem, three chronological periods are distinguished: pre-revolutionary, Soviet, post-Soviet.
1. Pre-revolutionary period. First written work, in which there is a mention of the Chuvash on the Bashkir lands, is the work of P.I.
Rychkova1. It contains materials about the settlement of the Chuvash in different provinces, covers issues of religion, social status, but there is no description of material culture and life. In his travel notes he reflected what he saw among the Chuvash and P.S. Pallas2. His work is a historical ethnographic description of various aspects of the material and spiritual culture of the people, including the farmstead, the residential hut, and its interior. Materials on the ethnography of the Chuvash and peoples living nearby were systematized by G.F.
Separate paragraphs are devoted to the structure of villages, estates, and housing.
In the work of I.G. Georgi devoted an insignificant paragraph to the Chuvash, however, it mentions their settlement in the Orenburg province and describes significant elements of culture4. A comprehensive work dedicated to the Chuvash can be considered “Notes of Alexandra Fuks about the Chuvash and Cheremis of the Kazan province”5. Despite the fact that the object of the author’s scientific attention was the Chuvash of the Kazan province, the collected materials create a single image of the ethnic group, including settlers on the Bashkir lands.
By the middle of the 19th century. refers to the work of V.M. Cheremshansky, dedicated to Rychkov P.I. Topography of the Orenburg province. Orenburg: Printing house of B. Breolin, 1887. Part 1. P. 133 Pallas P.S. Traveling through different provinces Russian Empire. St. Petersburg, 1773. Part 1.
Miller G.F. Description of the pagan peoples living in the Kazan province, such as the Cheremis, Chuvash and Votyaks. St. Petersburg, 1791.
Georgi I.G. Description of all the peoples living in the Russian state: their everyday rituals, customs, clothes, homes, exercises, fun, religions and other attractions. St. Petersburg:
Russian Symphony, 2005. pp. 80-85.
Fuks A.A. Notes of Alexandra Fuks about the Chuvash and Cheremis of the Kazan province. Kazan: Printing house of the Kazan Imperial University, 1840.
description of the Orenburg province and the peoples living within its borders6. In the chapter “Turkish-Tatar Tribe,” the author, together with the Bashkirs, Teptyars, Meshcheryaks, and Tatars, examines the Chuvash. Their anthropological characteristics are given, their way of life, religious specifics, holidays and rituals are described.
In conclusion the dwelling, food system and costume of the Chuvash are outlined.
Works containing general materials about the Chuvash, primarily the Kazan province, include the works of A.F. Rittikha7, V.K. Magnitsky8, K.S.
Milkovich9. At the beginning of the 20th century. publications of S.A. were published Bagina10, S.I. Rudenko11.
The work of G.I. deserves attention. Komissarov “Chuvash of the Kazan Trans-Volga Region”12. Having described the culture of the Chuvash in the Kazan province, he touches on the problem of their settlement in the Urals and Siberia. The researcher presents a detailed analysis of settlements and dwellings in a separate chapter. He examined the structure of villages, estates, outbuildings, dwellings, and interiors.
In general, studies of the pre-revolutionary period are works of a generalizing nature. They examine not only the Chuvash, but also the peoples neighboring them, the features of their material and spiritual culture, and provide the first information about the emergence and types of settlements, the location of estates, household buildings, and residential complexes.
Along with the general works of P.S. Pallas, G.F. Miller and other authors, works devoted only to the Chuvash appear (K.S. Milkovich, V.A.
Sboev, V.K. Magnitsky, G.I. Komissarov, etc.).
2. Soviet period. The study of the Chuvash of Bashkortostan in this chronological period can be systematized as follows:
1. 1917–1930 – the time of functioning of elements of traditional culture in everyday life, a high degree of preservation of folk architecture, which was recorded during expeditionary trips. Changes in ethnic culture are evident by the beginning of 1930;
2. 1930–1955 – the period of the organization of new types of general economy, the NEP, the events of the Great Patriotic War led to a weakening of interest in the history and ethnography of the peoples of the Ural-Volga region.
Cheremshansky V.M. Description of the Orenburg province in economic-statistical, ethnographic and industrial relations. Ufa: Printing house of the Orenburg Provincial Board, 1859. pp. 173-178.
Rittich A.F. Materials for the ethnography of Russia. XIV. Kazan province. Kazan: Printing house of the Imperial Kazan University, 1870. Part II. pp. 41-120.
Magnitsky V.K. Materials for the explanation of the old Chuvash faith. Kazan: Printing house of the Imperial University, 1881.
Milkovich K.S. About the Chuvash. Ethnographic essay by an unknown author of the 18th century. Kazan:
Printing house of the provincial government, 1888.
Bagin S.A. About the fall away to Mohammedanism of the baptized foreigners of the Kazan diocese and about the reasons for this sad phenomenon // Orthodox interlocutor. Kazan, 1910. No.1. pp. 118-127; No. 2. pp. 225-236.
Rudenko S.I. Chuvash tombstones// Materials on the ethnography of Russia. St. Petersburg, 1910. T. 1. S.
Komissarov G.I. Chuvash of the Kazan Trans-Volga region // News of the Society of Archeology, History and Ethnography at the Imperial Kazan University. Kazan: Typo-lithography of the Imperial University, 1911. T.
XXVII. Vol. 5. pp. 311-432.
3. 1955–1991 – conducting expeditions in Bashkiria to study the local group of Chuvash, expanding the scope of the survey and applying the principle of “continuous” study.
From the works of researchers 1917–1930. the most significant works of N.V.
Nikolsky13. His research was based on materials he collected among the Chuvash of the metropolis, but contained valuable information about the Chuvash of Bashkiria. P.A. Petrov-Turinge conducted expeditions to study this group. Its results were published in several publications, among which the article “Work among the Chuvash”14 is of interest. The author summed up the results of field work in various Chuvash settlements. During the expedition, 1,200 plans of dwellings and courtyards were recorded, materials on public education were collected, about Chuvash songs were recorded, and 200 photographs were taken.
The work of A.P. belongs to the second period. Smirnova “ Ancient history Chuvash people (before the Mongol conquest)”15. The work provides a description of dugouts, half-dugouts that existed in Chuvashia in the Middle Ages, and later among the Chuvash migrants.
In 1955–1991, quite a lot of works were published, including studies by N.I. Vorobyova16, collective monograph “Chuvash” in 2 parts, dedicated to the material and spiritual culture of the Chuvash, including local ethnic groups17. Works that contain information on the history of the Chuvash peasantry and the development of relations in the village include the works of I.D. Kuznetsova18, V.D. Dimitrieva19.
The process of peasant migrations to Bashkiria and the participation of the Chuvash in them was considered by A.N. Usmanov20. Somewhat later, these same questions were raised in the studies of W.Kh. Rakhmatullin21 and S.Kh. Alishev22, touching on the problem of the entry of the peoples of the Volga region into the Russian state and their subsequent socio-economic development.
Chuvash folk art - weaving, embroidery, wood carving Nikolsky N.V. A short course on the ethnography of the Chuvash. Cheboksary: Chuvash. state publishing house, 1928. Issue. 1.
Petrov-Turinge P.A. Work among the Chuvash // Materials of the Society for the Study of Bashkiria: Collection of Local History. Ufa: Publishing House of the Society for the Study of Bashkiria, 1930. No. 3-4. pp. 95-98.
Smirnov A.P. Ancient history of the Chuvash people (before the Mongol invasion). Cheboksary:
Chuvashgosizdat, 1948.
Vorobiev N.I. On the history of rural housing among the peoples of the Middle Volga region // Brief communications of the Institute of Ethnography named after. N.N. Miklouho-Maclay. M.: Publishing House of the USSR Academy of Sciences, 1956 P. 3-18; Vorobiev N.I. Wood carving among the Chuvash // Soviet ethnography. M.: Publishing House of the USSR Academy of Sciences, 1956. No. 4. WITH.
Chuvash. Ethnographic research. Material culture. Cheboksary: Chuvash. state publishing house, 1956. Ch.
1.; Chuvash. Ethnographic research. Spiritual culture. Cheboksary: Chuvash. book publishing house, 1970. Part 2.
Kuznetsov I.D. Essays on the history of the Chuvash peasantry. Cheboksary: Chuvash. state publishing house, 1957;
Kuznetsov I.D. Peasantry of Chuvashia during the period of capitalism. Cheboksary: Chuvash. book publishing house, 1963.
Dimitriev V.D. History of Chuvashia in the 18th century. Cheboksary: Chuvash. state publishing house, 1959.
Usmanov A.N. Annexation of Bashkiria to the Russian state. Ufa: Kitap, 1960.
Rakhmatullin U.Kh. Population of Bashkiria in the 17th – 18th centuries. Issues of formation of the non-Bashkir population. M.: Nauka, 1988.
Alishev S.Kh. Historical destinies peoples of the Middle Volga region XVI – early XIX centuries. M.: Nauka, 1990.
etc. – studied by G.A. Nikitin and T.A. Kryukova23. They examined different carving techniques, patterns of ornamentation, and analyzed fragments of the house that were covered with patterns. Special attention deserves an article by L.A. Ivanov, in which the settlements and dwellings of the Chuvash of the Kama region and the Southern Urals are subjected to a comprehensive study24. Later, the materials of the article were used by the author in his monograph “Modern life and culture of the Chuvash population”25.
The first study devoted to one of the main domestic buildings - the bathhouse - was an article by G.A. Alekseeva26. The structure of villages and hamlets was studied by A.G. Simonov27. Settlements and dwellings of the Chuvash, as well as other peoples of the Volga region, were studied by K.I. Kozlova28. The collective monograph “Peoples of the Volga and Urals: Historical and Ethnographic Essays” also examined Chuvash villages, residential and economic complexes29.
In the works of G.B. Matveev, construction equipment, housing structures, household buildings, and materials were studied and analyzed in detail30.
Among the works devoted to the decorative design of a home, the most significant is the work of E.P. Busygina, N.V. Zorina and L.S. Toksubaeva31. They consider methods and techniques for decorating a house, the design of jewelry, types of carvings, and analyze the architecture of the peoples of the Volga region.
Transformation of material culture in the 20th century. was reflected in the article by V.P. Ivanova “Ethnocultural processes among the Cis-Ural Chuvash (based on materials from the 1987 expedition)”32.
Interesting teamwork employees of the ChNII YaLIE “Chuvashi Nikitin G.A., Kryukova T.A. Chuvash folk art. Cheboksary: Chuvash. state
publishing house, 1960.
Ivanov L.A. Settlements and dwellings of the Chuvash population of the Kama Trans-Volga region and the Southern Urals // Questions of the history of Chuvashia. Scientific notes. Cheboksary: Chuvash. book publishing house, 1965. Issue. XXIX. pp. 184-211.
Ivanov L.A. Modern life and culture of the rural Chuvash population. Cheboksary: Chuvash. book Publishing house, 1973.
Alekseev G.A. On the use of baths in Chuvash folk medicine // Questions of the history of the Chuvash Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic. Scientific notes. Cheboksary: CHNII YALIE, 1970. Vol. 52. pp. 284-289.
Simonov A.G. Cumulus plan in the development of villages of the peoples of the Middle Volga region // Ancient and modern ethnocultural processes in the Mari region. Yoshkar-Ola: MarNII, 1976. pp. 134-144.
Kozlova K.I. Ethnography of the peoples of the Volga region. M.: Moscow University Publishing House, 1964.
Peoples of the Volga and Urals regions. Historical and ethnographic essays. M.: Nauka, 1985. pp. 175-199.
Matveev G.B. Peasant construction equipment (Northwestern regions of Chuvashia) // Questions of material and spiritual culture of the Chuvash people. Cheboksary: CHNII YALIE, 1986. P. 31-44; Matveev G.B. On some features of the traditional dwelling of the Chuvash population of the Tatar Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic, Ulyanovsk and Kuibyshev regions // Culture and life of the lower Chuvash. Cheboksary: CHNII YALIE, 1986. P. 32-47; Matveev G.B. Rural settlements of the Chuvash in the second half of the 19th – early 20th centuries.
(Materials for the historical and ethnographic atlas) // Ethnography of the Chuvash peasantry. Cheboksary:
CHNII YALIE, 1987. P. 35-50; Matveev G.B. Dwelling and outbuildings of the middle Chuvash (Second half of the 19th – early 20th centuries) (Materials for the historical and ethnographic atlas) // Traditional economy and culture of the Chuvash. Cheboksary: CHNII YALIE, 1988. pp. 53-63.
Busygin E.P., Zorin N.V., Toksubaeva L.S. Decorative design of rural housing in the Kazan Volga region. Kazan: Tatar book. publishing house, 1986.
Ivanov V.P. Ethnocultural processes among the Cis-Ural Chuvash (based on materials from the 1987 expedition) // Ethnos and its divisions. Ethnic and ethnographic groups in the Volga-Ural region. M.: Nauka, 1992. Part 2. pp. 70-79.
Cis-Urals: cultural and everyday processes”33, which touches on the formation of the Chuvash group of Bashkortostan, material and spiritual culture, including art using the example of grave structures and decorative design of homes34.
So, during the Soviet period, the local group of Chuvash in Bashkortostan became the subject of independent study. In the works of researchers, issues of migration to the Bashkir lands, the development of villages in new conditions, interethnic contacts, the process of transformation of ethnic culture, change and partial conservation of elements are discussed.
3. Post-Soviet period. Due to the increasing interest in the problem of the ethnographic specificity of local groups of the Chuvash of the Ural-Volga region and more distant territories, scientists are paying more attention to the study of the Chuvash of Bashkortostan.
The history of the emergence of Chuvash settlements on the territory of Bashkiria was examined in detail by A.Z. Asfandiyarov 35. The author also touches on the problem of interethnic relations in Bashkiria, the situation of immigrants, and issues of land ownership by the newcomer population36. V.P. Ivanov devoted his works to the analysis of settlement, interethnic contacts, and population dynamics of the Chuvash37. V.D. studied the progress of Chuvash migration to the Urals and other areas. Dimitriev38, based on historical legends.
Religious ideas, the preservation of traditional beliefs, the semantics of housing among the Chuvash of the metropolis and various local groups were analyzed in the works of A.K. Salmina39. Turning to ritual actions, he also cites the areas of their existence. The content contains the Chuvash of the Urals: cultural and everyday processes. Cheboksary: CHNII YALIE, 1989.
Trofimov A.A. Folk and amateur art // Chuvash of the Urals: cultural and everyday processes. Cheboksary: CHNII YALIE, 1989. pp. 72-93.
Asfandiyarov A.Z. History of villages and hamlets of Bashkortostan. Reference book. Ufa: Kitap, 1990. Book. 1;
Asfandiyarov A.Z. History of villages and hamlets of Bashkortostan. Reference book. Ufa: Kitap, 1998. Book. 2-3;
Asfandiyarov A.Z. History of villages and hamlets of Bashkortostan. Reference book. Ufa: Kitap, 1993. Book. 3.
Asfandiyarov A.Z. Bashkiria after joining Russia (second half of the 16th – first half of the 19th century). Ufa: Kitap, 2006.
Ivanov V.P. Settlement and number of Chuvash: Ethnogeographical sketch. Cheboksary, 1992; Ivanov V.P. Chuvash ethnic group. Problems of history and ethnogeography. Cheboksary: ChGIGN, 1998; Ivanov V.P.
Formation of the Chuvash diaspora // Races and peoples: Modern ethnic and racial problems. M.:
Science, 2003. Vol. 29. P. 105-123; Ivanov V.P. Settlement and number of Chuvash in Russia: historical dynamics and regional features (Historical and ethnographic research): Dis... doc. ist. Sci.
Cheboksary, 2005; Ivanov V.P. Ethnic geography of the Chuvash people. Historical population dynamics and regional features of settlement. Cheboksary: Chuvash. book publishing house, 2005; Ivanov V.P., Mikhailov Yu.T. Chuvash population of the Orenburg region: formation of an ethno-territorial group:
ethnoculture, population dynamics // Chuvash Humanitarian Bulletin. Cheboksary: ChGIGN, 2007/2008.
No. 3. pp. 63-79.
Dimitriev V.D. Chuvash historical legends: Essays on the history of the Chuvash people from ancient times to the mid-19th century. Cheboksary: Chuvash. book publishing house, 1993.
Salmin A.K. Religious and ritual system of the Chuvash. Cheboksary: ChGIGN, 1993; Salmin A.K. Chuvash folk rituals. Cheboksary: ChGIGN, 1994; Salmin A.K. Semantics at home among the Chuvash. Cheboksary:
ChGIGN, 1998; Salmin A.K. Three Chuvash deities. Cheboksary: Krona, 2003; Salmin A.K. The Chuvash religion system. St. Petersburg: Nauka, 2007.
A significant contribution to the study of the group was made by the work of ethnographer I.G.
Petrova “Chuvash of Bashkortostan (Popular essay on ethnic history and traditional culture)”40. The publication has become a comprehensive study containing a brief description of the material and spiritual culture of the Chuvash in Bashkiria. It, among other things, examined the estate, outbuildings, housing, and interior. The results were published in a number of publications41. In the post-Soviet period, G.B. continues research.
Matveev42. A significant proportion of his works are devoted to the Chuvash dwelling and yard (materials, structures, location of buildings, etc.).
Problems of resettlement of the Chuvash, Islamization in connection with foreign ethnic influence, changes and degree of preservation of elements folk culture, language processes were considered by E.A. Yagafova43.
An article by researcher P.P. is also important when studying housing. Fokina “ Construction rites modern Chuvash family”44. D.F.
Madurov in his work deals with the issues of decorating the home, estate and outbuildings of the Chuvash45.
The resettlement of the Chuvash to Bashkiria becomes the subject of research by G.A. Nikolaeva46. The most detailed coverage of the problem is offered by I.V. Sukhareva47. First chapter her work is devoted to the migration of the Chuvash in the 17th – 19th centuries. Petrov I.G. contributed to the study of the Chuvash villages of Bashkiria. Chuvash of Bashkortostan (Popular essay on ethnic history and traditional culture).
Ufa: Ufa City Printing House, 1994.
Petrov I.G. Chuvash // Vatandash. Ufa: Kitap, 1999. No. 9. pp. 148-168.
Matveev G.B. Material culture of the Chuvash. Cheboksary: ChGIGN, 1995; Matveev G.B. Dwelling and outbuildings of the Chuvash of the Urals // Materials on the ethnography and anthropology of the Chuvash.
Cheboksary: ChGIGN, 1997. pp. 118-130; Matveev G.B. Chuvash folk architecture: from antiquity to modern times. Cheboksary: Chuvash. book publishing house, 2005; Matveev G.B. The evolution of Chuvash folk architecture in the 1920s // Artistic culture of Chuvashia: 20s of the XX century. Cheboksary: ChGIGN, 2005.
Yagafova E.A. Formation of ethno-territorial groups of the Chuvash in the XVII - 19th centuries(historical and cultural aspect) // Races and peoples: Modern ethnic and racial problems. M.: Nauka, 2003. Vol.
29. pp. 124-148; Yagafova E.A. Islamization of the Chuvash in the Ural-Volga region in the 18th – early 20th centuries. // Ethnographic review. M.: Nauka, 2007. No. 4. pp. 101-117; Yagafova E.A. Chuvash of the Ural-Volga region:
history and traditional culture ethno-territorial groups (XVII - early XX centuries). Cheboksary: ChGIGN, 2007; Yagafova E.A. Ethno-confessional minorities of the Chuvash // Ethnographic Review. M.: Nauka, 2008. No. 4. pp. 114-127; Yagafova E.A. Chuvash in the intercultural borderland of the Ural-Volga region // Ethnographic Review. M.: Nauka, 2009. No. 6. pp. 120-133; Yagafova E.A. Chuvash Muslims in the 18th – early 21st centuries. Samara: PGSGA, 2009; Yagafova E.A. Chuvash in interethnic interaction in Trans-Kama // Ethnographic Review. M.: Nauka, 2010. No. 6. pp. 35-53.
Fokin P.P. Construction rituals of the modern Chuvash family // Ethnology of Chuvash religion.
Cheboksary: ChGIGN, 2003. Vol. I. S. 65-84.
Madurov D.F. Traditional decorative arts and Chuvash holidays. Cheboksary: Chuvash. book publishing house, 2004.
Nikolaev G.A. The acquisition by Chuvash settlers of the second small homeland on the Bashkir lands in the 18th – early 20th centuries // Chuvash Humanitarian Bulletin. Cheboksary: ChGIGN, 2007. No. 1. pp. 154-179.
Sukhareva I.V. Chuvash of Bashkortostan in the 17th – 19th centuries: Economic development and social structure. Ufa: Gilem, 2007.
local historians A.F. Semenov48, V.V. Nikolaev and S.F. Nikitin49, M.Kh. Safin50, A.A. Tkachev51, L.A. Fedorov52.
In general, despite a significant number of works devoted to the Chuvash group of Bashkiria, there are still significant gaps in the study of the structure of settlements, the organization of living space, the location of buildings on the estate and their functions, housing, decoration, and home interior. The lack of comprehensive work on this problem actualizes the need for its creation.
The purpose of the study is to study and classify settlements, household and residential buildings of the Chuvash people of Bashkiria.
To achieve the purpose of the study, the following were set: tasks:
– determine the main factors that contributed to the migration of the Chuvash to Bashkiria and the formation of an independent ethno-territorial group;
– identify the types and forms of settlements;
– present characteristics of traditional residential and commercial buildings, explore materials, structures, construction techniques;
– to identify the impact of a foreign ethnic environment on the Chuvash of Bashkiria, to establish the degree of ethnic isolation and preservation of the architectural traditions of the designated group.
The source base for the research is materials of different nature, origin and degree of representativeness:
1. Unpublished archival materials. This group of sources includes archival documents from the State Archive of the Orenburg Region (GAOO), the Scientific Archive of the Chuvash State Institute of Humanities (NA ChGIGN), as well as the Central State Historical Archive of the Republic of Bashkortostan (TSHIA RB).
In the SAOO, the richest material on the research topic is contained in the funds “Office of the Orenburg Governor General” (F. 6), “Chernov Ivan Vasilyevich” (F. 167), “Orenburg Spiritual Administration” (F. 172), “Orenburg Provincial Po presence in peasant affairs” (F. 13), “Orenburg office of the Orenburg Forestry, Industrial and Trade Society” (F. 154).
Among the documents at ChGIGN we highlight “Manuscript Fund of Prof. N.V.
Nikolsky on the ethnography of the Chuvash people” (Department I). It contains information about the emergence of Chuvash villages in the Urals, statistical data, descriptions of settlements, estates, residential and outbuildings.
Semenov A.F. From the history of our native land. Bizhbulyak district. Bizhbulyak: Bizhbulyak regional printing house, 1993.
Nikolaev V.V., Nikitin S.F., Safin S.Kh. History of the emergence and development of the Chuvash Karamaly village. Family tree first settler Nikita Avdokim. Orenburg: Gazprompechat LLC Orenburggazpromservice, 1999.
Safin M.Kh. History of the village of Bishkain. Orenburg: Gazprompechat LLC Orenburggazpromservice, 2003.
Tkachev A.A. Beloretsk: pages of history (1743–1939). Beloretsk: Belor. House of Printing, 2003. Book. 1.
Fedorov L.A. Dyurtyuli and Dyurtyulin people for 300 years. Tuymazy: Tuymazy Bulletin, 2005.
Among the materials of the Central State Historical Archive of the Republic of Belarus, it is necessary to highlight the fund “Ufa Provincial Land Management Commission” (F. 351). The fund contains images of settlements in the Ufa province, including the Chuvash ones.
2. Field ethnographic materials collected by the author during expeditionary trips to the Chuvash settlements of Bashkortostan form the main basis of the study. During the work period, trips were made to Aurgazinsky (Bishkain village - 2010; Tolbazy village - 2010; Yulamanovo village - 2010), Bakalinsky (Yultimirovka village - 2010; Akhmanovo village - 2010 .), Gafuriysky (Antonovka village - 2011; Dmitrievka village - 2011), Zilairsky (Berdyash village - 2008, 2009; Ivano-Kuvalat village - 2009, 2010; x.
Nadezhdinsky - 2009; With. Yamansaz - 2010), Khaibullinsky (Pugachevo village - 2010; Yakovlevka village - 2010) districts.
During the expeditions, a significant amount of material was documented (sketches, photographs and videos). Work in various geographical zones helped to obtain a comprehensive understanding of the villages, farm buildings and dwellings of the Chuvash people of Bashkiria.
3. The funds of historical and local history museums, containing a significant amount of material material and photographic illustrations, also contributed to the expansion of the volume new information on the problem being studied. Collections of household items, clothing, reconstruction of the interior of a Chuvash home, weaving items used in everyday life are in the historical and ethnographic museum of the village. Tolbazy, school museums with. Berdyash and s. IvanoKuvalat, Chuvash Sunday school them. P.M. Mironova (Ufa).
4. Published materials used in the process of developing the problem are divided into various categories: documents and materials reflecting statistical information, reports on the development of various types of industries53; periodical press materials covering current events54; works of fiction, for example, the work of K.V. Ivanova “Narspi”55; works of folklore genre - legends, songs, proverbs56. Among such publications is the work of N.I. Ashmarina “Collection of Chuvash songs recorded in the provinces. Migrants and resettlement work in the Belebey district of the Ufa province. Report on the trip of V.A. Abryutina. Ufa: Printing house of the Provincial Board, 1898; Materials for studying the crafts of the population of the Kazan province. Kazan: Printing house of the Kazan Exchange Leaflet, 1887.
Baronov S. Study of the life of the Chuvash. Return of the Chuvpedtechnikum expedition // Red Bashkiria.
Ivanov K.V. Narspi. M.: State. Publishing house Fiction, 1937.
Malkhov P.M. Simbirsk Chuvash and their poetry. Kazan: Printing house of the Imperial University, 1877;
Romanov N.R. Chuvash proverbs, sayings and riddles. Cheboksary: Chuvash. state publishing house, 1960; Sirotkin M.Ya. Chuvash folklore. Essay on oral poetry folk art. Cheboksary: Chuvash. book publishing house, 1965; Songs of the grassroots Chuvash (Collection of songs). Cheboksary: Chuvash. book publishing house, 1981; Meszaros D. Monuments of the old Chuvash faith. Cheboksary: ChGIGN, 2000.
Kazan, Simbirsk and Ufa”57. Dictionaries were used as reference publications58. Here we also highlight the work of N.I. Ashmarina – “Dictionary of the Chuvash language”59. Practical significance The work consists in the fact that for each Chuvash word the author gives a description of the meanings, related words and local pronunciations.
So, the source base of the study is quite representative and allows us to comprehensively solve the problems.
The methodological basis of the study is the theory of local civilizations by Toynbee, who defined civilization as a type of human community that evokes certain associations in the field of religion, architecture, painting, morals, customs, i.e. in the field of culture. Toynbee believed that civilization is an ethnic culture that has reached the limits of self-identification. By local civilization he meant a stable unity of people that arose in the presence of a common territory, based on certain archetypes, common values and traditions.
The existence of civilization is influenced by various conditions, which leads to the emergence of a unique cultural appearance.
The formation and then subsequent development of local groups occurs precisely in such conditions. Its own ethnic culture, which has developed after a certain amount of time and under the influence of various reasons, allows us to speak of an ethno-territorial group as a closed civilization, the development of which occurs separately from the metropolis.
The theoretical and methodological basis of the study also included the works of S.A. Arutyunov and E.S. Markaryan60, M.V. Vitova61, N.N. Cheboksarov and I.A. Cheboksarova62, G.B. Matveeva63, E.E. Blomkvist64, M.G. Rabinovicha65, N.V. Shlygina66. The nature of the dissertation was determined by the principles and methods proposed by the authors of these works, which were relied upon when discussing the topic.
Various groups of research methods were used in the work - Ashmarin N.I. A collection of Chuvash songs recorded in the provinces of Kazan, Simbirsk and Ufa.
Kazan: Typo-lithography of the Imperial University, 1900.
Nikolsky N.V. Russian-Chuvash dictionary. Kazan: Central Printing House, 1909.
Ashmarin N.I. Dictionary of the Chuvash language (reprint). Cheboksary: Russika, 1994-2000. T. 1-17.
Livelihood culture and ethnicity. Experience of ethnocultural research (based on materials from the Armenian rural culture). Yerevan: Academy of Sciences of the ArmSSR, 1983.
Vitov M.V. On the classification of settlements // Soviet ethnography. M.: USSR Academy of Sciences, 1953. No. 3. pp. 27-37.
Cheboksarov N.N., Cheboksarova I.A. Ecology and types of traditional rural housing // Typology of the main elements of traditional culture. M.: Nauka, 1984. pp. 34-64.
Matveev G.B. Chuvash folk architecture: from antiquity to modern times.
Blomkvist E.E. Peasant buildings of Russians, Ukrainians and Belarusians (settlements, dwellings and outbuildings) // East Slavic ethnographic collection. Essays on the folk material culture of Russians, Ukrainians and Belarusians in the 19th – early 20th centuries. M.: Publishing House of the USSR Academy of Sciences, 1956. P.
Rabinovich M.G. Russian housing in the XIII – XVII centuries. // Ancient dwelling of peoples Eastern Europe. M.:
Science, 1975. pp. 156-244.
Shlygina N.V. Peasant dwelling Finns // Types of rural housing in foreign European countries.
M.: Nauka, 1968. pp. 346-360.
general scientific, general historical, methods of ethnographic research.
Among the general scientific methods used in the work are analogy, analysis, description, synthesis, induction and deduction.
General historical (special scientific) research methods were represented by the unity of historical-genetic, historical-comparative, historical-typological and historical-systemic approaches.
The historical-genetic method was used to analyze the history of the development of residential and commercial buildings. The historical-comparative method was taken as the basis of the study, which made it possible to trace the development of settlements and buildings not only among the Chuvash, but also among neighboring ethnic groups. Comparison, as a method, helped to identify features inherent in the construction practice of the Chuvash, and at the same time – features characteristic of the Ural-Volga region.
The historical-typological method is applied in the process of ordering a set of objects into separately presented parts. With the help of the historical-systemic method, it was possible to carry out a holistic and full analysis the structure of settlements, the location of outbuildings and residential buildings on the estate, study dwellings and buildings.
Field research was carried out by direct observation, which resulted in contact with the group being studied.
A variation of the survey was one of the private methods - interviews. When working with informants, both in-depth and structural interviews were used. Often the interview, intended by the author to be formal, became semi-formalized or was conducted in the form of an open interview.
The study used the vestiges method, which records the remains of the past. The method allows one to draw conclusions about the state of things at an earlier stage and serves as a general indication of the historical past of the peoples among whom they developed. The method is used in relation to such traditional and even archaic buildings as la and two-story barns. The principle of historicism was applied, which involves a comprehensive analysis of the development of historical processes and makes it possible to study phenomena in a specific historical situation. The work also uses the principle of systematicity (system analysis).
Scientific novelty The research consists of conducting the first special historical and ethnographic analysis of the settlements and dwellings of the Chuvash people of Bashkortostan. For the first time, residential, household complexes are considered based on the material of various settlements; the main factors that contributed to migration were identified; types of settlement, settlement of the Chuvash, forms of settlements; construction materials installed; The types and designs of dwellings, domestic buildings, and their location on the estate were studied.
The scientific and practical significance of the study lies in the fact that its results can become the starting point for further study of the Chuvash people of Bashkiria. The work fills a significant gap in the research. historical development, functioning of settlements and dwellings of the local group. Materials can be used in scientific work employees of historical and local history museums are involved in the preparation of educational programs and the development of lecture courses on history and ethnic culture.
The results obtained by the applicant may be in demand in the cultural and educational activities of employees of cultural institutions.
Provisions for defense:
– the formation of the Chuvash ethno-territorial group on the territory of Bashkiria was a complex process that included a number of factors and reasons. The emergence of Chuvash villages depended on the measures and decrees of the government, the complacency of the Bashkir patrimonial lords, and Russian landowners. Intraethnic mixtures between Chuvash of various ethnographic groups and interethnic contacts led to the formation of multiethnic settlements that had a unique cultural appearance;
- Chuvash villages and villages on Bashkir lands retained the traditional Chuvash structure, which did not exclude the emergence of new features characteristic of this region. The process of organizing living space combined a tribute to the tradition that existed in the metropolis, fidelity historical memory and, at the same time, borrowing many elements of the culture of neighboring peoples;
– the Chuvash estate with a residential complex and a number of buildings for economic purposes has undergone transformations due not only to a change in place of residence and a new ethnic environment, but also to processes occurring in Russia - the introduction of new forms of farming, the cultivation of new crops, technical re-equipment, etc. ;
– geographical isolation and foreign ethnic influence, close contacts with Russians, Bashkirs and other ethnic groups in the second half of the 19th – early 20th centuries. together led to significant changes in the appearance of the studied group.
Approbation of results research. Basic provisions works are reflected in 14 publications, including 3 works published in a journal recommended by the Higher Attestation Commission. Research results tested at International (Chelyabinsk, 2011) and All-Russian (Irkutsk, 2010;
Ufa, 2010; Krasnoyarsk, 2011; Petrozavodsk, 2011; Ufa, 2011) conferences. Articles and theses on the research problem were published in Magnitogorsk collections state university.
The dissertation research was discussed at a meeting of the Department of History of the Ancient World and the Middle Ages of the Magnitogorsk State University on October 5, 2011.
The structure of the study consists of an introduction, three chapters, a conclusion, a list of sources and literature used, a list of abbreviations and three appendices (list of informants, lists of Chuvash settlements in Bashkortostan, illustrations).
BASIC CONTENT OF THE WORK
In the Introduction, the relevance of the problem is substantiated, the object and subject of the study, its chronological framework and territorial boundaries are defined, the goal and objectives are formulated, a historiographical and source study analysis is carried out, the basic methodological principles and research methods are substantiated, as well as scientific novelty and practical significance.In the first chapter“The history of the formation of the ethnoterritorial group of the Chuvash of Bashkortostan” examines the process of migration of the Chuvash to the territory of Bashkiria. The reasons and factors that prompted the Chuvash to move to undeveloped lands, the history of the emergence of the first Chuvash villages and villages on Bashkir lands are analyzed in detail, the emergence of mono- and multi-ethnic settlements is considered.
The first paragraph, “The beginning of the resettlement of the Chuvash in the process of settling the Urals,” shows the progress of the migration of the Chuvash to Bashkiria from the middle of the 17th century to the 30–40s. XVIII century Considerable attention is paid to the reasons and factors that contributed to the beginning of the resettlement process.
Since simultaneous migrations also occurred among other populations of the Volga region, the movements of the Mari, Udmurts and other peoples to the territory of the Southern Urals are presented as comparative materials. Among the main reasons and factors for migration are land shortage, high taxation, etc. Moving to new lands was a form of struggle against the state.
The migration movement is intensifying as the government takes action, interested in attracting the population to the outlying lands not only by providing monetary benefits and tax exemptions, but also by using the non-Russian peasantry, including the Chuvash, in the construction of supporting cities and fortresses. Groups of migrants eventually settle on the territory of Bashkiria. During this period, the first Chuvash villages appeared on these lands, representing villages with few households.
The second paragraph, “The emergence of Chuvash settlements during the second wave of migration,” examines the resettlement processes of the 30–40s. XVIII – early XIX centuries. This stage is characterized by an increase in the number of Chuvash migrants in the Bashkir lands, due to a variety of reasons - the development of metallurgy in the Urals, the forced Christianization of the non-Russian population of the Volga region in the places of exodus, the flight of the Chuvash after protests against the government. To prevent unauthorized departures of the Chuvash from their former territories, special units were organized, with the help of which fugitives were sent to their place of former residence.
Chuvash settlements arise in the western territories of Bashkiria, as well as within the southwestern and central lands. During this period, the first Chuvash villages appeared in the south of Bashkiria. The conditions under which the Chuvash occupied lands could be different - agreements with Bashkirs patrimonial owners, Russian nobles and factory owners, unauthorized seizure of land, etc. The settlers sought to settle near Chuvash villages founded in more early period. This circumstance led to the formation of cluster settlement, which became characteristic feature for the central and western regions of Bashkiria. In the southern reaches, dispersed settlement prevailed, due to which the influence of other ethnicities manifested itself here to a greater extent than with the cluster arrangement of settlements. In general, the presence of such villages and hamlets led to mutual ethnocultural assimilation.
In the third paragraph, “The final stage of the resettlement of the Chuvash,” a study of the migration process in the 19th – early 20th centuries was carried out. During this period, the Chuvash completed their active movement to Bashkiria. In the second half of the 19th century. There has been an increase in the resettlement movement due to the abolition of serfdom in 1861, the emergence of new railway communication lines, and the possibility of obtaining cash loans for the purchase of land from the Peasant Land Bank.
The Chuvash continue to inhabit both mono-ethnic and ethnically mixed villages. Population growth becomes possible not only due to external, but also internal migrations, i.e. resettlement of the Chuvash to neighboring villages.
The process of separating daughter villages from mother villages is becoming common. The emergence of new settlements was especially accelerated during the years of the Stolypin reform. In the 20th century The mechanical growth of the Chuvash population is replaced by a natural one, although some of the Chuvash convert to Islam during interethnic assimilation, which leads to a change in ethnic identity. In the near future, they will be recorded as Tatars, and not Chuvash. So, the emergence of Chuvash villages and hamlets in Bashkiria occurred over a significant chronological period, which led to a cluster arrangement of settlements; dispersed settlement of the Chuvash is characteristic of later times. Simultaneous settlement of Bashkiria different peoples influenced the ethnic composition of new settlements.
Chapter two The study “Settlements of the Chuvash of Bashkortostan” is devoted to the analysis of the types and types of rural settlements of the Chuvash in Bashkiria.
The paragraph “Types of settlement and resettlement” examines the location of Chuvash villages depending on the natural-geographical factor, primarily in relation to the reservoir, which played a decisive role in the life support system. The work identifies three types of settlements: riverside, lakeside and watershed. All of the above types are applicable to Chuvash settlements, but the river location was predominant. The reservoir performed not only a practical, but also a sacred function: it was necessary when conducting both family and calendar rituals. The presence of rivers, lakes and their role in the fate of settlements is also confirmed by numerous hydronyms in the toponymy of settlements.
Type of population settlement, i.e. the location of settlements relative to each other was determined by social affiliation, community and related activities, religious organization, as well as economic activities of the population. As noted, during the period of migration in the early stages, the Chuvash were characterized by cluster settlement, then the scattered arrangement of villages spread. The settlement could be divided into ends where representatives of different ethnic groups lived, as well as Chuvash people who belonged to different ethno-confessional groups.
Such situations led to the eviction of some villagers and the formation of new farmsteads or small-yard villages. Gradually, the settlements grew into settlements and became centers of economic development among smaller villages.
The second paragraph, “Types and forms of settlements,” examines the types of Chuvash settlements in the second half of the 19th – early 20th centuries. Chuvash settlements were villages, hamlets, neighborhoods, hamlets, settlements, settlements, and repairs. The most common form of settlement was villages. Initially, Chuvash villages were characterized by a random arrangement of estates, but in the process of redevelopment of settlements, the street type began to predominate. Chuvash villages had a number of unique features - artificial landscaping of settlements, especially among the riding Chuvash, field fences and field gates. Their presence in the appearance of villages and hamlets can be interpreted as the preservation ethnic identity population.
The Chuvash settlements varied in number. The first villages were small and consisted of 2–3 to 20–30 households. By the beginning of the 20th century. Larger settlements began to predominate. The role of settlements changed with the presence of religious and public buildings in them.
The cemetery was an integral part of villages and hamlets. In settlements with a multi-ethnic or multi-confessional population, there were several cemeteries. Gravestone sculpture and the organization of space in a rural cemetery depended on the religion of the deceased and their relatives. The presence of a church in a settlement increased its status and influence on the surrounding villages. A similar thing was observed in cases of the presence of bazaars, fairs, grain warehouses, shops, and other buildings.
The final third chapter, “Residential and economic buildings of the Chuvash of Bashkortostan,” is devoted to the construction business among a group of Chuvash who settled within Bashkiria. The materials and structures of dwellings, the layout of the estate, residential buildings and utility buildings were analyzed as components.
The first paragraph, “Building materials and housing structures,” analyzes the building materials used by the Chuvash of Bashkiria. The most common material was wood various breeds- from coniferous to deciduous. Stone, adobe, and wattle were also used for the construction of residential and commercial buildings.
These materials were more often found in less wealthy peasant farms, and also for the construction of outbuildings. The choice of building material also depended on natural factors. In the steppe regions of Bashkiria, adobe buildings were more common than in forest areas.
To build a residential building or household premises, the Chuvash, like other ethnic groups, collected help from relatives and neighbors.
Particular attention was paid to the harvesting of construction timber: transportation, drying of logs and subsequent processing, and the cutting process. The main type of Chuvash dwelling was single-chamber buildings - hut + canopy. There were variants: hut + canopy + cage, hut + canopy + hut. At a later time, the types of hut with a truss, five-walled huts, cross-shaped houses, and brick houses arose.
Dwellings were erected using timber-framed equipment; outbuildings could be erected not only with timber-framed construction, but also with pole-and-frame and post-frame equipment. Stone or wooden pillars were used as foundations, and dwellings were often installed directly on the ground. Among the types of roofs there were male and rafter structures; the shapes were gable, three-pitched and hipped roofs.
In the second paragraph, “Layout of estates,” the location of a residential complex and domestic buildings in the peasant yard is considered. The Chuvash courtyard belongs to the round type, known as a fortress courtyard. The Chuvash people of the Southern Urals are characterized by L-shaped and U-shaped layouts. From the middle of the 19th century. The layout of the estate changes as it includes vegetable gardens. A bathhouse was placed at some distance from the household buildings. There could be a well within the yard. The buildings were connected to each other into a single connection or located nearby. The estate was surrounded by a fence, and there were several types of fencing - log, flagstone, wattle fence, poles, etc.
Considerable attention was paid to the gates, which were decorated with carvings.
First of all, the gate posts were decorated. Let's highlight several types of gates - in the form of spinning poles, plank gates without a roof, Russian gates, i.e. with a gable roof. The gate was considered the border between the estate and the outside world, they played traditional worldview the Chuvash have a special role. The application of patterns on them in the form of various carvings was an indicator of the material well-being of the peasant economy.
In the third paragraph, “Residential buildings,” the residential buildings of the Chuvash people of Bashkiria are analyzed. Not only log huts, but also temporary premises, such as dugouts, were used as residential buildings. During the migrations they were the most common among migrants.
The final type of housing that exists to this day is log houses. The construction process was accompanied by a number of rituals - laying money, wool under the foundation, performing a ritual meal;
raising the matitsa and performing the corresponding ritual; installation of guardianship, etc. For external decoration they used carvings, wall plaster, and whitewash; in wealthier households they resorted to polychrome wall coverings.
Window frames were richly decorated with carvings. Blind carving was widespread, as well as varieties of bas-relief, applied and sawn.
The central place in the residential building was occupied by the stove, which was located to the right or left of the front door. There was a table diagonally from the stove, a shrine hung, and the front corner was set up here. Among the Chuvash there were two types of hearth - with a hanging or mounted boiler. A stove pillar was placed nearby, with crossbars running along the sides, and a bench was also made here.
The space of the hut was divided into sectors: the front (or God's) corner, the front room, the sleeping place, etc. The basis of the furniture was bunks, benches, a makeshift table and a chair in front of it, and crossbars for storing things. Textiles were used in the interior, for example, embroidered towels.
Paragraph four, “Household buildings,” is devoted to various household buildings that were erected on estates and beyond. Among the buildings there were a barn, a cage, a bathhouse, a shack, a cellar, premises for livestock (stable, barn, barn), etc. The most archaic building was the shack (la), found among the peoples of the Volga region under other names and playing a significant role in traditional rituals . The barn, which served to store grain, was considered an important building. household items. The cage had a similar function, intended, in addition to storing food and belongings, as a place to sleep in the warm season.
For long-term storage of food, a cellar was built, which served both in summer and winter.
A separate complex included premises for livestock. Cattle huts consisted of log cabins with small windows; the ceilings were made of logs. Used for the construction of commercial buildings various materials– wood, wattle fence, stone, adobe. A bathhouse could be located outside the estate. As a rule, it was placed at a distance from a residential building and buildings. In addition to log baths, dugout bathhouses also existed among the Chuvash of the Urals. To this day, there are smoke baths that exist along with white baths. The peasant estate ended with a threshing floor, where there were barns for drying sheaves and a chaff bin in which equipment was stored. Omshaniks were built to store hives in winter. In general, the complex of household buildings common in the Chuvash settlements of Bashkiria was not unique and was found with minor differences among other peoples of the Ural-Volga region. The Conclusion presents the main conclusions on the research topic:
firstly, the process of formation of the Chuvash ethno-territorial group on the Bashkir lands was quite complex, multi-stage, and depended on a number of factors and reasons that contributed to or hindered its progress. It is not possible to say that relocations took place only peacefully, since one of the reasons for migration was uprisings and, as a consequence, flight to new lands.
Note that the movements occurred on the part of three ethnographic groups of the Chuvash - upper, middle, lower - and led to subsequent internal mixing. We must not lose sight of interethnic contacts, which ended in mixing, in some cases, assimilation of the Chuvash and even assimilation of representatives of other peoples by the Chuvash. Representatives of other ETG Chuvash participated in the formation of the local group, which contributed to the formation of a unique cultural type;
secondly, the Chuvash settlements of Bashkiria, in our opinion, only at the initial stage retained their ethnocultural appearance. With the transition to street planning, the villages of the Chuvash, Mari, Udmurts, Tatars and Bashkirs acquire something in common in their appearance. It cannot be argued that they began to resemble each other and lost their ethnic specificity, however, the redevelopment left an indelible unifying mark;
thirdly, the Chuvash courtyard, the buildings went through a certain stage of development associated with the growth of the level of culture of the people, the influence of the urban lifestyle, as well as foreign influence, especially in areas of predominance of multi-ethnic settlements or dispersed settlements of the Chuvash.
The change from a chicken hut to a white one, new construction techniques, foreign borrowings (for example, from the Bashkirs): all this speaks of the transformation of Chuvash architecture, its change under the influence of various factors.
At the same time, the presence of the building la, its existence to this day, as well as the preservation of traditional construction techniques, structures, collection of help and observance of rituals, allows us to speak about the loyalty of the Chuvash to their architectural traditions.
Settlements and dwellings, as an important component of the material culture of an ethnos, are a certain marker of the degree of development of a people or their local group. Settlements, dwellings, and outbuildings incorporate both innovations acquired during interethnic contacts and retain the features of folk architecture.
The dissertation work does not claim to be complete, and therefore the following prospects arise for further study: detailed analysis of the external decoration and interior of the Chuvash home;
a more detailed study of sacred places in the structure of settlements, the role of rural cemeteries in the organization of space; comparative analysis of burial structures of the Chuvash of Bashkiria with the peoples of the Ural-Volga region, identifying common and special features.
1. Medvedev V.V. Formation of the ethno-territorial group of the Chuvash of Bashkortostan in the 19th – early 20th centuries / V.V. Medvedev // Problems of history, philology, culture. – Moscow–Magnitogorsk–Novosibirsk: Publishing house “Analitik”. – 2010. – No. 3 (29). – pp. 303–315.
2. Medvedev V.V. Prayer of the Chk of the unbaptized Chuvash of Bashkortostan (based on expedition materials) / V.V. Medvedev // Problems of history, philology, culture. – Moscow–Magnitogorsk–Novosibirsk: Publishing house “Analitik”. – 2010. – No. 4 (30). – pp. 282–293.
3. Medvedev V.V. Cemeteries and gravesites of the unbaptized Chuvash of Bashkortostan (based on materials from a 2010 study) / V.V. Medvedev // Problems of history, philology, culture. – Moscow–Magnitogorsk–Novosibirsk: Publishing house “Analitik”. – 2011. – No. 2 (32). – pp. 375–384.
4. Medvedev V.V. Features of the village of Ivano-Kuvalat (based on expedition materials) / V.V. Medvedev // Eurasian cultural space. Archeology, ethnology, anthropology: Materials of reports of the V (L) Russian (with international participation) archaeological and ethnographic conference of students and young scientists, Irkutsk, April 4, 2010 - Irkutsk: Publishing House “Ottisk”, 2010. - P. 548–549.
5. Medvedev V.V. Features of the typology and layout of the Chuvash settlements of Bashkortostan (second half of the 19th – early 20th centuries) / V.V. Medvedev // Ethnicities and cultures of the Ural-Volga region: history and modernity: materials of the IV All-Russian scientific and practical conference of young scientists. – Ufa: IEI UC RAS, 2010. – P.
6. Medvedev V.V. On the issue of the formation of the Chuvash ethnic group of Bashkortostan in the mid-17th - 30-40s. XVIII centuries / V.V. Medvedev // SCIENCE – UNIVERSITY – SCHOOL: collection. scientific tr. young researchers. – Magnitogorsk: MaSU, 2010. – Issue. 15.
– pp. 141–153.
7. Medvedev V.V. On the issue of the emergence of Chuvash settlements in Bashkortostan in the 30–40s. XVIII – early XIX centuries. / V.V. Medvedev // Bulletin of MaSU: periodical scientific journal. – Magnitogorsk: MaSU, 2010. – Issue. 12. – pp. 44–48.
8. Medvedev V.V. Prayer of the Chk of the unbaptized Chuvash of the Southern Urals (based on materials from a 2010 study) / V.V. Medvedev // Archeology, ethnography, paleoecology of Northern Eurasia: problems, search, discoveries: materials of the LI Regional (VII All-Russian) archaeological and ethnographic conference of students and young scientists, dedicated to the 30th anniversary of the discovery paleolithic art Northern Angara region and the 55th anniversary of the organization of the Krasnoyarsk archaeological expedition, Krasnoyarsk, March 22–25, 2011 – Krasnoyarsk: KSPU, 2011. – P. 299–302.
9. Medvedev V.V. Traditional material culture unbaptized Chuvash of the Southern Urals in the 21st century as a component of ethnic identity / V.V.
Medvedev // Traditional societies: the unknown past: materials of the VII International.
10. Medvedev V.V. Prayer to the Chk of the unbaptized Chuvash of Bashkortostan: tradition and modernity / V.V. Medvedev // IX Congress of Ethnographers and Anthropologists of Russia: Abstracts of reports. Petrozavodsk, July 4–8, 2011 – Petrozavodsk: Karelian Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2011. – P. 141.
11. Petrov I.G., Medvedev V.V. Grave monuments of unbaptized Chuvash of the Southern Urals: traditions and innovations / I.G. Petrov, V.V. Medvedev // IX Congress of Ethnographers and Anthropologists of Russia: Abstracts of reports. Petrozavodsk, July 4–8, 2011 – Petrozavodsk: Karelian Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2011. – P. 143.
12. Medvedev V.V. Building materials and structures of dwellings of the Chuvash people of Bashkiria (second half of the 19th – early 20th centuries) / V.V. Medvedev // Ethnicities and cultures of the Ural-Volga region: history and modernity: materials of the V All-Russian scientific and practical conference of young scientists. – Ufa: IEI UC RAS, 2011. – pp. 111–118.
13. Medvedev V.V. Outbuildings Chuvash of the Ufa province in the second half of the 19th – early 20th centuries / V.V. Medvedev // Current problems of history and ethnology: Materials of the All-Russian scientific and practical conference dedicated to the 70th anniversary of the birth of R.Z. Yanguzin and the 20th anniversary of the Department of History of the Republic of Belarus and Ethnology. G.
14. Medvedev V.V. The linguistic situation among the unbaptized Chuvash of the Southern Urals as a component of ethnic identity / V.V. Medvedev // Scientific and pedagogical heritage of the outstanding figure in public education, Chuvash educator Pavel Mironov: Collection. materials Vseros. scientific pract. conf., Russia, Republic of Bashkortostan, Ufa, December 9, 2011 – Sterlitamak: Sterlitamak. state ped. Academy named after Zainab Biisheva, 2011. – pp. 313–319.
Candidate of Historical Sciences degrees Scientific supervisors: Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor A.N. Zheravina, Candidate of Historical Sciences, Associate Professor A.N. Kotlyarov Tomsk - 2003 The dissertation was completed at the Department of National History of Tomsk State University Scientific supervisors Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor...”
“Elena Yuryevna Litsareva POLICY OF THE COUNTRIES OF THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE ASIAN PACIFIC REGION IN THE FIELD OF ECONOMIC INTEGRATION. MID 70'S. XX CENTURY – END OF XX CENTURY (HISTORICAL AND COMPARATIVE STUDY). Specialty 07.00.03 – general history Abstract of the dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Historical Sciences Tomsk 2006 The work was carried out at the Department of World Politics of the Faculty of History of the State Educational Institution of Higher Professional Education “Tomsk State University” Scientific consultant a: Doctor...”
“KONDRASHIN Vitaly Viktorovich Iron processing in the Middle Volga and Kama region in the 3rd century. BC - VII century AD (technological aspect) Specialty 07.00.06. - archeology Abstract of the dissertation for the degree of Candidate of Historical Sciences Izhevsk - 2003 The work was completed at Samara State University Scientific supervisor: Candidate of Historical Sciences, Associate Professor G.I. Matveeva Official opponents: Doctor of Historical Sciences E.P. Kazakov candidate of historical..."
“Shelepova Elena Vladimirovna RITUAL MONUMENTS OF THE ALTAI NOMADS OF LATE ANCIENTITY AND EARLY MIDDLE AGES Specialty 07.00.06 – archeology Abstract of the dissertation for the degree of candidate of historical sciences Barnaul - 2009 The work was completed at the department of archeology, ethnography and museology of civil society HPE Altai State University Scientific supervisor: Doctor of History Sciences, Associate Professor Alexey Alekseevich Tishkin Official opponents: Doctor of Historical Sciences,...”
“Tsareva Alexandra Petrovna ENGLISH NOBLERY FAMILY IN THE SECOND HALF OF THE 18th – EARLY 19TH CENTURIES: LIFE WAY AND MORAL VALUES Section 07.00.00 – Historical Sciences and Specialty 07.00.03 – General History (new and modern times) Abstract of the dissertation for the degree of candidate of historical sciences Moscow - 20 The dissertation was completed at the department of New and Contemporary History...”
“SADIKOV RANUS RAFIKOVICH RELIGIOUS BELIEFS AND RITUALS OF THE ZAKAMA UDMURTs (preservation and continuity of tradition) Specialty 07.00.07 – Ethnography, ethnology and anthropology Abstract of the dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Historical Sciences Izhevsk - 2011 Work completed at the Institution of the Russian Academy of Sciences Institute nological research named after. R.G. Kuzeev Ufa Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor Scientific consultant: Yunusova..."
"historical research ABSTRACT of the dissertation for the degree of Candidate of Historical Sciences Tomsk - 2009 The work was completed at the Department of National History of the State Educational Institution of Higher Professional Education Tomsk State University Scientific supervisors: Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor Lyudmila Grigorievna Sukhotina Doctor of Historical Sciences,..."
“Poldnikov Dmitry Yurievich CONTRACT AND PACT IN THE DOCTRINE OF GLOSSATORS (XII-XIII CENTURIES) Specialty 07.00.03 - General history (history of the Middle Ages) Abstract of the dissertation for the degree of candidate of historical sciences Moscow 2005 Work completed at the Institute of General History Russian Academy Sciences (IVI RAS) Scientific supervisor: Candidate of Historical Sciences, Doctor of Legal Sciences L. L. Kofanov Official opponents: Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor I. S...."
“Grik Nikolay Antonovich POLITICS AND ECONOMY OF THE SOVIET STATE IN 1921-1933: CRITICAL ANALYSIS Specialty 07.00.02 - Domestic history ABSTRACT of the dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Historical Sciences Tomsk - 2003 The work was completed at the Department of History and Documentation, Faculty of History, Tomsk State University Scientific consultant: Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor Yu.V. Kupert Official opponents: Doctor of Historical Sciences,...”
“Smirnov Sergey Viktorovich RUSSIAN EMIGRANTS IN NORTHERN MANCHURIA (EARLY 1920s -1945): THE PROBLEM OF SOCIAL ADAPTATION 07.00.02 - Domestic history Abstract of the dissertation for the degree of candidate of historical sciences Ekaterinburg - 2002 The dissertation was completed at the Department of History of Russia Ural State Pedagogical university. Scientific supervisor: Candidate of Historical Sciences, Professor Sutyrin Boris Alekseevich Official opponents..."
“AMANOVA ASEL SERIKOVNA Social and cultural development of diasporas of North-Eastern Kazakhstan in 1937-2005. (based on materials from the Pavlodar region) 07.00.02 – Domestic history (History of the Republic of Kazakhstan) Abstract of the dissertation for the degree of candidate of historical sciences Republic of Kazakhstan Karaganda, 2009 The work was carried out at the department of history of Kazakhstan and foreign countries, faculty of history, economics and law of Pavlodar... »
“Ganin Andrey Vladislavovich Orenburg Cossack army at the end of the 19th – beginning of the 20th centuries. (1891-1917) Specialty 07.00.02 – Domestic history Abstract of the dissertation for the academic degree of Candidate of Historical Sciences Moscow 2006 The work was completed at the Department of History of Russia XIX – early. XX centuries Faculty of History, Moscow State University. M.V. Lomonosov Scientific...”
“Galimova Liliya Nadipovna MULTINATIONAL MERCHANTS OF THE MIDDLE VOLGA REGION IN THE SECOND HALF OF THE 19TH – EARLY XX CENTURIES: HISTORICAL EXPERIENCE OF SOCIOCULTURAL DEVELOPMENT Specialty 07.00.02 – Domestic history ABSTRACT of the dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Historical Sciences Che boxars – 2013 The work was carried out at the Department of Archeology, Ethnography and Regional Studies history FSBEI HPE Chuvash State University named after I.N. Ulyanova Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor..."
“Zhuravleva Natalya Valerievna ROYAL CULT IN THE SELUCID STATE (from Seleukos I to Antiochus III) Specialty 07.00.03 – general history (history of the ancient world) ABSTRACT Dissertations of an academic degree for the Candidate of Historical Sciences Moscow 2009 The work was completed at the Department of History ancient world Faculty of History, Moscow State University. M.V.Lomonosov Scientific..."
“GRISHCHENKO ALEXEY NIKOLAEVICH ANTI-BOLSHEVIST REBEL MOVEMENT IN THE DON REGION IN 1920-1922 Specialty – 07.00.02 – Domestic history ABSTRACT of the dissertation for the degree of candidate of historical sciences Rostov-on-Don 2009 2 Dissertation completed at the Department of Russian Modern History of the Southern Federal University Scientific supervisor: Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor Trut Vladimir Petrovich Official opponents: Doctor...”
“Fedotova Anastasia Yuryevna HELPING THE STARVING POPULATION OF TASSR BY SOVIET AND FOREIGN ORGANIZATIONS IN 1921 – 1923. Specialty 07.00.02 - domestic history ABSTRACT of the dissertation for the degree of candidate of historical sciences Kazan - 2011 The work was carried out at the Department of National History of the Faculty of History of the Federal State Autonomous educational institution higher vocational education Kazan (Volga region) federal..."
“NEFEDKIN ALEXANDER KONSTANTINOVICH CAVALRY OF THE HELLENISM ERA (military and social aspect) Specialty 07.00.03 - general history (history of ancient Greece and Rome) Abstract of the dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Historical Sciences St. Petersburg 2006 2 The work was completed at the Department of History of Ancient Greece and Rome Faculty of History, St. Petersburg State University Scientific consultant: Doctor...”
“Semenova Anna Yuryevna SOCIO-ECONOMIC SITUATION OF WORKERS OF THE CENCISED INDUSTRY OF THE VYATKA PROVINCE / KIROV REGION IN 1928–1937. Specialty 07.00.02 - Domestic history ABSTRACT of the dissertation for the degree of candidate of historical sciences Izhevsk - 2012 The work was completed at the Vyatka State Humanitarian University (VyatGGU) Scientific supervisor: Bakulin Vladimir Ivanovich Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor Official opponents:..."
“Vibe Petr Petrovich GERMAN COLONIES IN SIBERIA IN CONDITIONS OF SOCIAL TRANSFORMATIONS OF THE END OF THE 19TH – FIRST THIRD OF THE XX CENTURIES. Specialty 07.00.02. – Domestic history Abstract of the dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Historical Sciences Omsk - 2009 The work was completed at the State Educational Institution of Higher Professional Education Omsk State Pedagogical University, at the Department of National History Official opponents: Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor German Arkady Adolfovich Doctor of Historical Sciences,...”
Plays in the speakers -
The mood now is Headache :(
Chuvash villages (“yal”, Turkic “aul”) were, as a rule, located near the water, in ravines. Villages of the inhabitants of the northern and central regions Chuvash Territory nests were located around one, larger settlement. In the southeast, in the steppe regions and outside Chuvashia, they were located in a linear order along the rivers. Chuvash villages in the past did not have a clear street layout. Courtyards were located in groups around the courtyard of the ancestor (patronymy).
ric15.jpg (9478 bytes)In the 50s-80s. XIX century According to government orders, redevelopment of Chuvash settlements is being carried out. Instead of clustered estates with crooked streets, alleys and driveways radiating from groups of courtyards, straight streets with two-way or one-way blocks appeared.
Traditionally, the villages of the upper Chuvash (i.e., in the northern regions of Chuvashia) were relatively small in number (30-70 households) compared to the villages of the middle and especially lower Chuvash (up to 1000 households) in the south of the region and beyond.
Chuvash estate
(plan of a Chuvash estate)
The Chuvash estate was divided into kilkarti, kartish - the front yard (i.e. the yard itself) and the back - ankarti. A cage was attached to a residential building (surt, purt).
The outbuildings of the middle peasant consisted of a barn, a stable, a barn (vite), a shed and a cellar. Almost every Chuvash yard had a summer kitchen. The bathhouse (muncha) was built at some distance from the estate, on the slope of a ravine, near the river.
Wealthy peasants had two huts, good-quality two-story barns, and a whole complex of premises for storing crops and keeping livestock. For wealthy peasants, the estate included up to 30 buildings, for the poor - only a hut, a canopy (replacing a barn), and a stable. Chuvash hut The courtyards were enclosed with an oak fence or tine.
Since the end of the 19th century. In Chuvash villages, spirit-three-leaf gates with a gable roof - “Russian gates” - are becoming widespread. Their pillars were decorated with relief carvings, a Bulgarian solar circle and a “rope”.
In the courtyard, under the lupasay canopy, a set of vehicles was stored: a cart (urapa), a drog (varam urapa), a sheaf-cart (pocket) and a sleigh (suna).
Wealthy peasants had holiday carriages - a tarantass with a wicker body, a sleigh with a backrest, wedding carts (keme) with a semi-closed body covered in leather.
A common type of hut is a four-walled hut. In the 19th century Prosperous Chuvash appeared with five-wall buildings, houses on stone foundations. In a number of areas of the Middle Volga region and especially the Urals, the Chuvash built houses from adobe, turf layers, and also from stone. The roofs were mostly gable; among the rich, there were hip roofs. The roof was made of bark, straw, shingles, and by the end of the 19th century. plank, iron and tiled roofs appear.
Exterior decoration and decoration of houses was almost never used in the distant past. Only wealthy peasants had the friezes of their houses decorated with carvings. Carvings (usually a solar circle) were also applied to the gate posts.
The interior of the Chuvash house was simple. Initially there was no canopy; there was only a closet. From the beginning of the 19th century. The Chuvash have chopped canopies. Inside the hut there were wide bunks along the walls, and bunks above the door, near the stove. The windows were covered with a specially treated bubble. Interior of a house with a stove The adobe stove had a recessed hearth and was heated black, the smoke was released through a fiberglass window in the corner. From the middle of the 19th century. The Chuvash are starting to install Russian stoves with a chimney. However, in them, the traditional hearth - “vuchakh” - with a suspended cauldron for the upper Chuvash and a sunken cauldron for the lower Chuvash (like the Tatars) - is preserved.
The Chuvash las is a quadrangular log house with an earthen floor, without a ceiling or windows, made of stones. In the summer they cooked and ate food and brewed beer there.
In the second half of the 19th century. wealthy Chuvash peasants began to build more spacious and comfortable houses. Instead of chicken huts, white huts and stone houses with glazed windows and warm entryways appear. In the houses there are objects of Russian peasant and sometimes urban furnishings. Luchina and tallow candles are gradually being replaced by kerosene lamps.
Richness of the table and household utensils
The Chuvash table was varied, but not rich. A significant part of the peasants considered the consumption of meat and animal fats as a sign of a state close to luxury. The basis of nutrition was bread made from rye flour - hura sakar.
There was no alternation of dishes in the daily diet of the Chuvash. The first courses consisted of soup with dumplings (salma-yashki, samakh yashky), soup with cereals, cabbage soup, turnip borscht, from the beginning of the 19th century. - potato soup. In the spring, green cabbage soup was cooked from cabbage soup, nettles, and hogweed (pultaran yashki).
As second courses, they used porridge (pata) made from spelled, barley, oat and occasionally wheat groats, oatmeal, jelly (nimer) made from oat, pea and rye flour. Since the 19th century Potatoes occupy a prominent place in the Chuvash diet. The dishes were washed down with buttermilk (uyran), sour milk (turakh), and also an emulsion of hemp seeds. The Bashkir and Orenburg Chuvash also made kumys.
For the holiday table, the Chuvash prepared hapartu - fluffy wheat bread, khuplu - a large round pie with a complex meat and cereal filling, puremech - large cheesecakes with various fillings, yava - baked balls of wheat flour without filling, huran kukli - small pies like dumplings (their cooked in a cauldron).
Remnants of the cattle-breeding traditions of the Chuvash ancestors are expressed in the persistent cultivation of the tradition of preparing meat soup ash (kakai) shurpi, boiled sausage Tultarmash, a special kind of sausage Sharttan (Old Iran. Shirdan) and curd cheese Chakat during the slaughter of livestock.
In the past, the Chuvash celebrated all holidays and rituals only with sara beer (Old Iran, more broadly). At the same time, beer was also an everyday drink. It was made from barley malt and hops. Wealthy Chuvash drank sim pylar (aged honey drink) and karchama (honey mash).
Collection of ancient national Chuvash dishes
Housewares
Among the Chuvash, almost all household utensils were made of wood. According to the manufacturing technique, it differs into:
1) hollowed-out utensils with a whole bottom (mortars, salt shakers, bowls and bowls for soup and butter, large and small ladles, altars for beer, troughs for takana flour, etc.);
2) dugout vessels with an inserted bottom (supse tubs, chiryas, lyangos (lenkes), batmans);
3) riveted products (buckets, barrels, tubs);
4) dishes made of birch bark (tuesa and purak body), bast and bark (boxes, hoops for cheese, etc.);
5) wicker utensils made of bast (purse, pester peshter, cups for bread) and wicker (baskets, etc.).
Chuvash potters appeared in the second half of the 18th century. They made pots (chulmek), jugs (kakshtam) for milk and beer, bowls and braziers.
Every Chuvash house had cast iron boilers of various sizes.
Until the beginning of the 20th century. Leather bags for grain - petre, and a takmak saddle bag - were in use.
Materials taken from the book:
"Chuvash. Ethnic history and traditional culture." Authors and compilers: V. P. Ivanov, V. V. Nikolaev, V. D. Dmitriev. Moscow, 2000. 
LEGENDS ABOUT CHUVASH HOUSES AND BUILDINGS. The villages were mostly small. There were no streets as such. Groups of houses were arranged randomly (sapalansa). The houses of relatives were located inside one large courtyard (puskil) with one gate. The houses of the descendants were built around the courtyard of the ancestor. They formed a patronymy - a small community of relatives. A large courtyard was often located near a water source. In 1927, V. Yakovleva from the village. Chinery of the Mariinsko-Posad district it was written: “In my father’s memory, there were no semblance of streets in our village. One courtyard faced one way, another faced the other way, and the third was behind them. When my father was 8-9 years old, all the yards were moved into two even rows, forming a straight street.” The redevelopment of villages and the formation of streets were carried out by government order in the 70s of the 19th century. “In the old days,” says the legend recorded in the village. Arabosi, Urmara district, three, even five families lived on one estate. It was difficult to get to some farms without asking questions... The hut, cages, and outbuildings were inside the yard. The yard was fenced with a wall." This arrangement of the courtyard depended on the surviving ancestral remnants. However, legends claim that the clustered arrangement of several (sometimes up to ten) houses was caused by the need for defense from robbers. The legend about ancient Shorshely (now Mariinsky Posad district), recorded by I. Ya. Konkov in 1970, says that eight families - Baybakh, Atlas and their relatives from the village. Bolshoye Kamaevo (in the same area) moved to the Shordal area (White Key) - on the banks of the Tsivilya River. The village received the name Shorshely from the area, and was officially called Baybakhtino - on behalf of the ancestor Baybakh. At first, the settlers built log half-dugouts der purt on the slope of the river bank. Within a few years, the peasants acquired houses and buildings. There were no drinks in those days. Everything was built only with an axe. Everyone had one fenced yard with one gate. In the courtyard, on four sides, there were two huts with doors facing each other, and between the huts there was an alkum vestibule (alak ume), that is, a canopy. In the middle of the vestibule there was a partition with a small window. The huts of the Khur purt were built from unhewn logs. They cut down one or two small windows: a person could not crawl through it. The stove was made of stones and clay; it did not have a chimney. To allow smoke to escape from the hut, two holes were made in the wall: one near the stove, the other next to the door. The chyonyo was covered with a lid. While the stove was firing, the smoke stood in the upper part of the hut, going down halfway to the door. He did not have time to exit through the shadow, and he had to let out the smoke through the door, which opened inward. The door was closed from the inside with a bolt, and at night with a tekyo support, extending from the front wall to the back. This was done to protect against robbers. In the courtyard, separate from the huts, there were premises for livestock and cages. The vegetable gardens were located away from the village, the threshing floor was located in the field. Many legends indicate that the doors of the huts were facing east. Every morning, the Chuvash, opening the door, turned their faces to the Sun and prayed to the pagan gods and deities. A legend recorded by V. Alexandrov in the village of Bolshoye Churashevo (now Yadrinsky district) in 1925 tells a slightly different story about the location of the hut and buildings in the courtyard. It says that next to the hut a cage, a stable, and a barn were placed. All buildings had doors that opened inward. The buildings could be entered from the hut through small secret doors on the side. At night, horses, cows, and sheep were driven into their premises and, having entered through the side doors, the large doors were locked with crossbars so that thieves could not open them. In the south-eastern, newly populated part of Chuvashia, the legend states, fearing robbers, “the Chuvash built their houses like a fortress: their courtyard was surrounded by tall, often two-story outbuildings, high slab oak fences, enclosed in thick oak pillars , and the hut was built in the middle of the yard. The windows in the hut were small, in one or two small sections, and there were two or three such windows in the hut, they were cut very high from the ground. The huts were locked from the inside with strong wooden latches and strong salap supports. All barns, stables, and gates had three strong locks: inside there was a salap support, which was unlocked with a secret rope, and a wooden latch, unlocked with a wooden hook, and outside there was a special huge quadrangular wooden lock, firmly attached to the door leaf. Houses were built with their backs to each other (kuta kutan) and small doors were cut for free passage from one house to another.” And in other legends it is persistently emphasized that the dwelling was built with the expectation of protection from attacks by robbers and forest animals. Very small windows were cut out at the chicken hut, which is why it was dark even in sunlight. It had a main door and a second - a secret exit, the front and rear gables of the hut were covered with logs, a ladder was installed to the stove, along which the owner climbed up and threw stones at the thieves who entered the hut. Tradition also speaks of this type of building: in the village. Ivanovo (now Yantikovsky district) Yumzya Ivan, the founder of the settlement, surrounded his yard on all sides with a double fence of brushwood and coated it, for strength, with a layer of clay on both sides, and compacted the entire void between the walls with clay. Inside the fortification, near his home, he erected a sanctuary. The surrounding Chuvash came here to perform chyuk - prayer with sacrifice. His relative Pusai, who lived next door to Ivan, helped the yumza by slaughtering the sacrificial animals that were brought. ..You could get into the Chuvash buildings from the hut through small secret side doors. At night, horses, cows, and sheep were driven into their premises and, having entered through the side doors, the large doors were locked with crossbars so that thieves could not open them. In the south-eastern, newly populated part of Chuvashia, the legend states, fearing robbers, “the Chuvash built their houses like a fortress: their courtyard was surrounded by high, often two-story outbuildings, high slab oak fences enclosed in thick oak pillars, and the hut was built in the middle of the yard. The windows in the hut were small, in one or two small sections, and there were two or three such windows in the hut, they were cut very high from the ground. The huts were locked from the inside with strong wooden latches and strong salap supports. All barns, stables, and gates had three strong locks: inside there was a salap support, which was unlocked with a secret rope, and a wooden latch, unlocked with a wooden hook, and outside there was a special huge quadrangular wooden lock, firmly attached to the door leaf. Houses were built with their backs to each other (kuta kutan) and small doors were cut for free passage from one house to another.” And in other legends it is persistently emphasized that the dwelling was built with the expectation of protection from attacks by robbers and forest animals. Very small windows were cut out at the chicken hut, which is why it was dark even in sunlight. It had a main door and a second - a secret exit, the front and rear gables of the hut were covered with logs, a ladder was installed to the stove, along which the owner climbed up and threw stones at the thieves who entered the hut. Tradition also speaks of this type of building: in the village. Ivanovo (now Yantikovsky district) Yumzya Ivan, the founder of the settlement, surrounded his yard on all sides with a double fence of brushwood and coated it, for strength, with a layer of clay on both sides, and compacted the entire void between the walls with clay. Inside the fortification, near his home, he erected a sanctuary. The surrounding Chuvash came here to perform chyuk - prayer with sacrifice. His relative Pusai, who lived next door to Ivan, helped the yumza by slaughtering the sacrificial animals that were brought. Article materials used; "On the accession of the Chuvash people to the Russian state."
HOUSING– built in accordance with nature. and socio-economic. living conditions, level of development of architecture, construction to meet housing needs, cultural component, including related ones. from ethnic. specifics. In individual Housing - technology, layout, interior - reflected traditionally. elements of culture. The functionality has been known since ancient times. division of housing into winter and summer, the origins of which go back to stable, permanent housing and portable, collapsible housing. Chuvash materials. Vocabularies, folklore, legends, and embroidery patterns indicate that the ancient housing of the Chuvash ancestors was a yurt. In writing sources near the Volga. Bulgarians, along with the Derevians. houses and adobe. J., felt yurts were also recorded. However, the Chuvash tradition of organizing yurts has not been preserved. Perhaps the rudiments of the ancient dwelling - tent-wagon (the main type of housing in the steppe zone) - are a leather-covered thuja k™mi (wedding wagon) and a wagon for spending the night during haymaking and grain harvest (it was covered with leather or rough canvas). Since ancient times, the semi-dugout served as a stationary dwelling; it dominated the forest-steppe. and step. stripes among the settled population of the Saltovo-Mayak culture; in the 2nd half. 1 thousand it also appears in the southern regions of the Kama region, but also existed in the late Middle Ages. In particular, due to the turbulent situation in the 2nd half. 14th – 15th centuries the population of Trans-Kama mainly built semi-dugouts, the walls of which were strengthened with wooden blocks. Above-ground adobe houses of round or oval shape with a conical roof were typical among the Bulgarians and, perhaps, preceded the log house, which was built in the Middle Ages. The Volga region has been known since the 2nd half. 1 thousand AD
Chuvash. peasants architecture dates back to the time when the main builder. the material was wood (mid 1st millennium AD), while the roots were ornamental. The motives lie deeper. The Chuvash log hut lasts a long time. time it was single-chamber, in the 17th–19th centuries. it was built with a canopy at the entrance, with a porch and, less often, with a canopy. In the 18th century or previously there were three chambers. F. hut + canopy + hut (one of the huts served as a clean half). In the 2nd half. 19th century single-chamber housing gave way to two-chamber housing (a hut with a closed entrance), more typical for the forest-steppe. zone, and a three-chamber one (a hut with a canopy and a cage), which was more common in the forest zone. The introduction of these types of housing was associated both with the development of construction. technology, as well as the redevelopment of settlements - replacing the cumulus plan with a street plan. Wealthy peasants built the so-called round houses - wide side towards the street, with a hallway with a hallway. like along a long wall. Houses were placed with their facade facing the street along one line (in the old days they were located in the middle of the courtyard or along the perimeter of nested courtyards). In the three-chamber connection, hut + canopy + cage (two-story barn), the cage or second floor of the barn was used as a summer living room (cage-bedroom). In the forest zone (in particular, in Kozmodemyan. u.) houses were built with a high roof, basement, and semi-basement. floor. Five-walled, which appeared in the 2nd half. 19th century, spread from the middle. 20th century; for forest-steppe. zones (ethno-territorial groups) a hut with a cut-out is more typical. A five-wall house with a truss and a cross house are variants of multi-chambers. wooden houses that had little share in the total housing stock.
In the beginning 20th century J. had wood. the foundation (pillars), log houses (10–15 crowns) were cut into a corner (“into a bowl”) from coniferous or linden logs, the frame crown was made from oak. Rafters. the roof replaced the male, which predominated until the gray. 19th century In the forest zone, the main material for covering was wood (shingles, bast, shingles, planks), in the forest-steppe. – straw. The four-walled building had 3–6 windows with single or double-leaf shutters (in the mid-19th century there were 1–2 small slanted windows without frames and glass windows). Old home orientation traditions, for example, to the east were no longer observed. in the end 19 – beginning 20th centuries has undergone a number of changes.
At the turn of the 19th–20th centuries. consumption of construction workers has increased. material. Wealthy peasants hired carpenters, carvers, joiners, masons; into peasants. innovations are being introduced into construction equipment. In the beginning 20th century in the development of peasants. In the early 1960s, a new type of housing appeared - chul ®urt (stone house), built of brick, incorporating classical elements into the architectural design. In the 1920s remarkable examples of external decoration appeared with the spread of new types of housing, such as a five-walled house, a “round” house, and a stone house. The art of ornamentation developed. carvings of elements of the facade of the house: platbands, cornice, pediment, front porch, gate. Political situation in the 1930s. led to a slowdown in the development of architecture.
Development of life in the 2nd half. 20th century happened on inherited. traditions and their combination with innovations. Five-walled houses and houses with trusses became the main types of housing; this situation persisted in the beginning. 21st century Log houses have more character. sign for the zone adjacent to forests; Logging technology is widely used in modernized construction. large houses and summer houses in the con. 20 – beginning 21st centuries New progressive technologies are being introduced. and rational. bricklaying methods. The share of brick houses is 40–50%. Large houses are being built with a large number of windows, improved. architecture appearance - with an attic, balcony, porch, tower, new roof shapes (attic, asymmetrical, multi-component), figured masonry of walls, cornice and platband, saw-cut carvings. Since the 1980s There has been a tendency towards the construction of residential and other premises under one roof. A two-story building is being built. Houses.
In Zh. Chuvash development is a builder. technology and architecture. elements had the same trends as other peoples of the Volga and Urals regions. In mid. 19th century were almost the only ones. exponent of decorative design of buildings. The residential building, unlike the gate, which did not face the outside space, was little decorated with carvings; note changes in appearance Housing began to happen with the installation of a hut facing the street. Change in structural and morphological The signs concerned the structure of the roof, windows, intimacy, and interior. Elements of art. design that spread to the end. 19th century, were a dormer and a dormer window with a platband, piers (boards covering the front end slope of the roof), overlay patterns on the gable field, cornice, platbands and shutters, cladding of corners and walls. Along with dugouts and sculptures. cutting and overhead threads were introduced using threads. Overhead figures - squares, rhombuses, round rosettes - were used instead of old carved rosettes. New traditions were consolidated in the 1920s. Examples of ornamentation from this period have been recorded , they indicate a significant level of Chuvash skill. carvers. In the external design of the house in the 2nd half. 20th century sawn (openwork, silhouette, overlay) carving, mosaic were used. wall cladding, expanded iron, plaster, whitewashing and painting, stucco, carving on wet plaster, figures. brickwork. Many options for decorating housing have been developed, reflecting quantitative, qualitative. and local. peculiarities. Abundance of decorative elements, large-patterned piece sets, wide cornice board with overlay. patterns, small architectures. shapes (attics of summer houses, gates), bright polychrome. coloring is a feature of the characteristics of J. in the southwest. regions of Chuvashia. To the northwest. Part of the decorative feature is, in particular, finely patterned carvings reminiscent of filigree. embroidery of Chuvash riding people, gates with carved and painted decorations of pillars in the old style. style, etc. Clear decorative. The ensemble consists of a residential building, a summer house and a gate. For ethnoterritorial. groups of Chuvash forest-steppe. zones (Samara and Saratov regions, Bashkortostan) character. element is the exterior finishing. walls of houses - coating, plaster, whitewashing. In a number of areas, especially in the east, the story became widespread. painting in enamel and oil paints.
With the emergence of cities, cities were built. J., which was originally made of wood. and had practically no differences from the rural one. Later, stone houses appeared for the wealthy. trading people, representing the 2nd floor. chambers, in which the residential floor was located above the subcellular utility floor. In some merchant houses, con. 19th century on the ground floor there were shops, restaurants and taverns.
In the beginning 20th century In connection with the development of industry in cities, a new type of housing appeared - hired, character. a feature of which was a number of more or less identical residential cells, united. general communications: corridor or stairs. In the 1920s–30s. in the cities of Chuvashia, 2nd floors were built. 6–8 apartments. wooden houses and barracks. Sharpness of dwellings. problems required the introduction of industrial. methods of construction and unification of types of housing. For this purpose, in 1929–31. A plant for the production of frame parts was built in Kozlovka. American houses. type for 8 apartments. In con. 1920s - early 1930s apartments began to be built. individual houses made of brick-pich. projects (for example, 18-apartment “House of Professorship” on K. Marx Street in Cheboksary, 1932), then, with the development of economic construction. sectional houses - according to standard ones.
From ser. 1960s massive construction of the 5th floor began. houses made of prefabricated reinforced concrete. panels according to a series of standard projects. The houses had 1-, 2- and 3-rooms. apartments with useful area from 31 to 57 m2 with full engineer. landscaping. In the beginning 1970s construction mastered new series large panel houses, which has a wide range of block sections with more comfort. apartments, which made it possible to solve the layout of neighborhoods in a picturesque and unconventional way. Pre-schools were built in them at the same time as housing. institutions, schools, trade and public service enterprises, cultural institutions. First 9th floor. a residential building of this series was built in Novocheboksarsk in 1974. At the end. 1970s - early 1980s Work has been carried out to unify large-panel products. housing construction and improvement of planning. solutions for apartments, as a result of which a regional was created. a series of standard designs for residential buildings and a block section was introduced. method of their design and construction (prize of the Council of Ministers of the USSR, 1983). The apartments have increased living space, the size of kitchens, hallways, and bathrooms.
In the beginning 1980s monolith housing construction has been introduced. concrete. The first monolith. residential building with 79 apartments (1-, 3-, 4-room apartments, total area from 36 to 87 m2) erected in Cheboksary in 1984. Along with large panels. and monolith. houses are built from brick, both standard and individual. projects, taking into account the specific features. family and site planning.
The quality of housing is determined by the state. nor-ma-tivami. Modern man. Urban housing is designed taking into account the occupancy of an apartment by one family. Apartments in state buildings. and municipal. The housing stock has living rooms and utility rooms. premises: kitchen, front room, bathroom, restroom, pantry; apartments in houses of other forms of ownership, in addition - additional. premises (children's room, dining room, office, etc.).
To create the most favorable. living conditions for villages. population in the 1960s work has begun on . Along with the traditional Residential buildings began to be built on 2-3 floors. sectional home city. type, equipped. centralized plumbing, sewerage and heating. Experiments were conducted to select the most rational one. types of villages J. (see ). Builder industry Chuvash. Rep. The production of products for complete assembly was mastered. estate houses type for 1–2 apartments and sections. houses with 12, 18 and 27 apartments. Significant things happened. changes in traditional G. Houses began to be built of brick, 1–2 floors with a large set of utility rooms. buildings The arch-tech tour has changed. image of the village G. All houses are electrified, gasified approx. 90% (2006).
Builder development. bases and individual. construction allowed to increase the number of dwellings to 2005. republic fund up to 26.1 million m2, housing availability – up to 20 m2 for 1 person
Chuvash house in Nefteyugansk August 8th, 2014
On the territory of the city center national cultures In Nefteyugansk, a Chuvash house with all outbuildings (courtyard) will be built. The city administration has already allocated a plot of land. Now it is necessary to help the initiative group with sketches, drawings and any information about what a real Chuvash hut looks like, where and how everything was located.
I quote verbatim the request of my fellow countrymen: “It is necessary to find a photo of a wooden, beautiful, real Chuvash house with Chuvash ornaments and patterns (preferably with different angles: front view, side view, rear view). Also necessary is the exact location of icons, tables, stoves, benches, cradles, cabinets for utensils, various home decorations, etc., i.e. what stood in the Chuvash house. It is necessary not only to find photographs, but also to give the exact name in both Russian and Chuvash languages. This will be a real Chuvash house, a house-museum. So that everyone who visits this house can feel the spirit of the Chuvash people, life, culture, hospitality. We really hope for your help and support."
The peasant estate of the mid-19th century is represented in the museum by a chicken hut with open outbuildings (cellar, utility barn and stable). The yard is surrounded by a log fence.
Chicken hut- a single-frame dwelling with open (later closed) vestibule, with an adobe, black-fired stove. The hut was an old form of housing that existed for a number of centuries, until the end of the 19th - beginning of the 20th century. Interesting features traditional architecture(cutting technique, roof construction - male, floor and ceiling, porch arrangement, various decorations). The hut was built in small sizes - 4.5x5 m, 5x6 m, and was close to a square in shape. The hut had one or two small windows facing south. A door was cut on the eastern side of the hut. The floor and ceiling were covered with half-logs and thick blocks hewn with an axe.
The canopy has no ceiling and is covered with a common hut roof. Bast, shingles, and straw were used as roofing materials. The Chuvash dwelling had the so-called Northern - Central Russian type of internal layout.
The adobe stove in the hut was placed to the right of the entrance door with its mouth towards the front wall. On one side of the mouth of the stove there was a fireplace with a suspended boiler. A feature of the interior of the home was the predominance of fixed furniture, structurally connected with the log house - these are bunks and benches around the table and near the stove, crossbars, utensils, shelves. A table was placed in the front corner of the hut, diagonally from the stove; logs were used for seats, and later chairs.
A barn is a log structure for storing grain that was built either on the estate or in front of a hut on the street; sometimes barns were grouped on the outskirts of the village. One of the characteristic barns with a bridge - platform and a double canopy - basement (two-story) is on display in the museum.
Inside the barn there are pits for storing grain and flour; the spacious top (2nd floor) is intended for storing food and utensils.
The windmill on the territory of the museum is placed on an artificially raised hill, which represents the construction of a complete complex of an operating mill - four wings, the tail turning of the wings in the direction of the wind. The operating mechanism of the windmill is a millstone with two disk stones, an Everetek drive shaft, and a box for receiving flour. Stair landings of 4 links were used to lubricate wooden mechanisms.
The “crane” well attracts the attention of museum visitors with its extraordinary appearance.
There is a pond on the territory, with a wooden bridge built across it. All these interesting and varied structures housed in the museum clearly demonstrate the architectural and construction culture of the Chuvash people.
