The further into the forest, the more firewood there is. The meaning of the proverb “the further into the forest, the more firewood. The further into the forest the continuation of the proverb

A selection of scary comics in the setting of rural America.

Fans of the horror genre are familiar firsthand with the oppressive atmosphere of American forests. You don’t have to look far for examples: you can recall both classics like Sam Raimi’s The Evil Dead and the experimental The Cabin in the Woods, directed by Drew Goddard.

However, this setting was approached not only by filmmakers, but also by many comic book authors, whose key works this collection will introduce you to. You can find more material about comics in my

Hillbilly by Eric Powell

Eric Powell is the creator of the legendary comic strip The Goon. Having completed the epic saga, the author changed course to more local stories in his new fantasy universe. A stern-looking protagonist with a mysterious origin, who travels the world and encounters evil spirits from myths and legends. Doesn't remind you of anything? Analogies with Hellboy suggest themselves, but already in the first issue it becomes obvious that the comics are different both in spirit and in execution.

During the time creation of The Goon Powell practiced screenwriting and art, reaching a high level in Hillbilly. Drawing inspiration from Appalachian folklore, the author uses a distinctive mountain accent in the dialogue to add authenticity to the work.

In this comic he moved away from the long format plot novel with many characters and twisting plots, focusing on short but captivating plots. Main character loves listening, telling and discussing stories. At the same time, as in life, stories change from storyteller to storyteller, inviting the reader to decide for himself: what is true and what is fiction.

To convey the mood, Powell actively works with colors: the main part of the world is made in muted yellow-brown shades, with sharp pencil lines, like a rough sketch in a notebook. At the same time, the author has an impressive set of visual styles, without turning the comic into a dull yellow mess. Powell enjoys working with mythological bestiary: here you will find many-faced wolves, insidious witches, familiar trolls and creatures characteristic of Appalachia, which you have hardly heard of before.

Overall, a great story that combines a unique fantasy universe with horror elements and great dialogues about repentance, love spells and stupid people.

Harrow County by Cullen Bunn & Tyler Crook

A teenage and sometimes rather naive comic book that talks, among other things, about the problems of growing up. The story of Harrow County is dedicated to the conflict between a girl and the villagers, who are confident that she is the next incarnation of a powerful witch who was once killed. Trying to prove my innocence, main character discovers that he really has a connection with supernatural beings.

After this, the plot of the work begins to develop rapidly, and many minor characters. Cullen Bunn, far from being the most talented screenwriter, performs surprisingly well in Harrow County. He is especially successful at intensifying the horror, which he creates using a simple formula: several pages are spent leading up to the spread, where the next monster appears in all its disgusting ugliness. A kind of analogue of jump scares from movies.

But the star of the comic is artist Tyler Crook, who is known for his work on B.P.R.D. The ability and love to draw monsters and “body horror” is what sets Harrow County authors apart from the rest. In addition to the horde of evil spirits, which range from skinless little boys to giant demons, the comic is replete with nauseating moments, such as people with disfigured faces, rotten food in which maggots swarm, and, of course, large quantity blood.

Freaks In The Heartland by Steve Niles & Greg Ruth

A slow, moving story about the importance and, at the same time, depravity of family ties, about the deeply wounded and wretched - all this through the prism of a closed community.

Greg Ruth, a comic book artist known among other things for his illustrations based on Twin Peaks, did a masterful job of conveying the viscous atmosphere of the work. Autumn, dirty tones are ideal for depicting rural areas: dilapidated barns, endless fields and withered trees. With every frame you plunge into the abyss of hopelessness, saturated with hatred and fear.

Even though the general outline of the universe is unsaid and many elements remain behind the scenes, ignoring the reader’s questions, the comic focuses on the two-faced nature of family ties. The authors are more interested in talking about the ambiguous moral essence of ugliness, where the absence of physical flaws does not make you a good person.

Moonshine by Brian Azarello & Eduardo Risso

Another work from the famous duo responsible for the crime comic 100 Bullets. Without parting with the gangsters, the authors add a pinch of horror and supernatural monsters to their new creation.

Moonshine will tell you a lot with its ambiguous name: having coveted excellent moonshine, polished gentlemen in jackets and with Thompson machine guns send their man to West Virginia in order to conclude a deal and arrange the supply of alcohol. As a result, the hero encounters a family clan of proud werewolves who do not need partners.

By setting the story in forests and swamps, Azzarello gives Risso complete carte blanche, emphasizing his irresistible love of contrast. Having gotten rid of contours, the artist enthusiastically depicts shadows that replace objects, buildings and even entire backgrounds. Whether it’s a hidden werewolf in the thicket of a forest, a character’s languid gaze, or a half-empty room, the artist invariably lines the frame with twilight.

In addition to the amazing art and monsters with bloody mouths, the comic contains reflections on the theme of loss - one of the main leitmotifs of Brian Azzarello. The main character, who has lost a loved one, with every step deep into the wild lands risks losing himself, forever getting lost in the madness of moonlight.

Hellboy The Crooked Man by Mike Mignola & Richard Corben

Traveling through 1950s Virginia, a cult demon witnesses otherworldly interference and teams up with a local redneck as they both try to figure out what's going on here.

It is not Mike Mignola himself who is responsible for the drawing, but the legendary author and artist Richard Corben, who specializes in the horror genre and is known for his characteristic style, expressed in the grotesque masculinity of the characters. This time, instead of muscular monsters, Corben surrounds readers with endless tracts of coniferous forests. The stunning beauty of the original landscape in Richard's rough, sloppy drawing captivates and points to sinister secrets hidden in the depths of untouched nature.

While the art most effectively conveys the aesthetic of one-story America, with all its dilapidated chapels in the wilderness and wooden shacks inhabited by witches, the story focuses on the motives of return: returning home, to origins, family reunion. Hellboy serves as a silent observer here, often remaining in the shadows or on the edge of the frame, giving way to the cursed little people who want to find peace in this dead land.

In general, comics are a very difficult medium for horror: the specificity of the image of frames and the absence of sounds pushes Mignola and Corben not to use standard “boo” moments and regular depiction of challenging elements on the pages of the comic, but to consistently build an oppressive atmosphere.

Gradually, page after page, the heroes plunge into the abyss of witchcraft, losing their comrades and all hope of redemption. When it’s all over, the reader will long remember the silent expanses of the mountains, dense forests and the devil's crooked grin.

The material has been updated by the editors

Since ancient times, people have learned to notice certain relationships between various phenomena and analyze them. And although they did not mean much then, they found their expression in various proverbs, sayings and sayings.

What is the role of folk wisdom in people's lives

Wise thoughts and advice for all occasions, which are contained in proverbs, accompany us throughout our lives. And despite the fact that some proverbs are hundreds of years old, they will always be relevant, because the basic laws of life will never change. There are a lot of wise sayings, for example: “The further into the forest, the more firewood”, “It looks smooth, but is not sweet in the tooth”, “Praise is ruin for a well done”, “Wait and you will see, wait and you will hear”, etc. All of them briefly and clearly characterize certain actions, relationships, phenomena, and give important life advice.

“The further into the forest, the more firewood.” Meaning of the proverb

Even in ancient times, without even knowing how to count, people noticed certain patterns. The more game they get while hunting, the longer the tribe will not suffer from hunger, the brighter and longer the fire burns, the hotter it will be in the cave, etc. The further into the forest, the more firewood - this is also a fact. At the edge of the forest, as a rule, everything has already been collected, but in the deep thicket, where no human has ever set foot, there is apparently no firewood. However, this saying has a much deeper meaning. Forest and firewood do not need to be taken literally; people simply expressed certain patterns that occur in our lives through the interconnection of these concepts.

In the proverb “the further into the forest, the more firewood,” the meaning is this: the deeper you delve into any business or undertaking, the more “pitfalls” come to the surface. This expression can be applied to many concepts and situations. For example, the deeper you begin to study a question, the more details you learn about it. Or the longer you communicate with a person, the better you understand the characteristics of his character.

In what situations is the proverb “The further into the forest, the more firewood” most often used?

Despite the fact that the meaning of the proverb allows it to be used in many situations, it is most often used when it comes to the occurrence of unforeseen difficulties and complications in any undertaking. It’s not for nothing that the proverb refers specifically to firewood. Everyone knows that the expression “to mess things up” means “to make a mistake by acting rashly,” that is, it is interpreted in a disapproving way.

This proverb can be applied not only in relation to a specific task that has been started. “The further into the forest, the more firewood” - this can be said in relation to a person who, for example, constantly deceives others, and lies draw him into a vicious circle, giving rise to more and more new lies. Or, for example, someone wants to climb career ladder and for this I am ready to do anything. If in order to achieve his goal he plays a dishonest game, then the higher he climbs the “steps”, the more unseemly acts he has to commit.

Conclusion

Folk wisdom, embedded in proverbs and sayings, briefly and succinctly characterizes all aspects of life - relationships between people, attitudes towards nature, human weaknesses and other aspects. All the proverbs and wise sayings are a real treasure that people have been collecting bit by bit for centuries and passing on to future generations. By proverbs and sayings one can judge the values ​​that are inherent in different cultures. It is precisely such statements that contain a vision of the world as a whole and in various private life situations. It is difficult to overestimate the importance and role of proverbs and sayings in the life of society. They are the spiritual heritage of our ancestors, which we are obliged to honor and protect.

With strange headlines appearing in lately in "Nasha Niva".

I can’t believe my eyes!

After all, “Nasha Niva” is not ours for a long time. But to wrap something like this up is mind-boggling!

However, if you take into account who calls the tune and add events to it last months, everything is drawn.

The West has finally changed its tactics. He no longer needed the destroyers of the last Soviet-era outpost. Their mission is over.

Due to the inertia of the working layers of the population, the electoral resource of the new plan, of course, remained the same. These are the intelligentsia, students and high school students.

The opposition has also invented the main culprit for “our troubles and our evils” - Putin’s Russia. Being under sanctions, you can hang all the dogs on her, starting with Ivan the Terrible. Will endure.

Now - at the instigation of Dubovets - they have added to her company, oddly enough, an ardent Russophobe of perestroika and post-Soviet times - Zenon Poznyak.

What is new in the approaches of the West and its henchmen to dismantling peace in our society?

The new task now is to enslave the same intelligentsia and youth on the sly. But without cultivating radical nationalist sentiments, but by creating intellectual platforms where fraternization with Russian liberals would become the norm.

After all, the Ciceros have disappeared from our country, and Navalny and others are visible in Russia.

I think that for this reason the opposition was gradually converted to Russian-speaking.

It is this goal that explains the strange appearance and circulation of quotes from the newly minted literary diva Svetlana Alexievich, who spoke quite definitely:

"To do what I did, on Belarusian language It was impossible."

And finally, period. Finally, the main thing is the emergence of a passionate desire among the puppeteers to create here, on the basis of the portal TUT.by, which has radically changed its rhetoric, an intellectual platform for those who like to scratch their tongues with the involvement of the promoted liberalism of foreign countries (read - Russian renegades).

They are, like no one else, close to us in mentality.

I wouldn’t be surprised if Shenderovich or the taciturn Savik Shuster show up as hosts of these gatherings.

After all, he never said anything unpleasant about Lukashenko. Others spoke, and he, without visible emotions on his face, listened and did not assent.

But let's return to Poznyak.

I will honestly say that I, like many, understand this very bright propagandist, who managed to become the central figure of the Belarusian Popular Front in the late 80s, and then with little effort to saddle the Belarusian parliament and solve the priority tasks of gaining independence for the country.

The main thing: he - ideological opponent everything Soviet, but not a traitor. He does not count “Judas’ pieces of silver” in his pocket, but sticks to his line because he believes, because he is convinced that he is right and defends his point of view.

The West did not like Poznyak’s straightforwardness and independence of judgment, and he was pushed to the margins of Russophobic politics.

He is not their man. They don't need people with their own opinions. They need performers.

So what does the revolutionary Sergei Dubovets, widely known in narrow circles, accuse Poznyak of on the pages of “Nasha Niva” and “Svoboda”?

Neither more nor less - in the most important thing: “The history of Muggles would have been different, if the Popular Front of the 90s would have been different.”.

Him, you see, then "nathnyauv pryklad" Popular Front of microscopic and quiet Estonia.

It was there, and not in Lithuania and Latvia with a huge number of Russians living, in his opinion, that the most successful pies were baked.

Maybe it was so, since in Estonia people did not die in clashes with special forces, and there was no particular need to torment the Russians. But Dubovets’ claim that he allegedly mastered the situation in the post-Soviet space at that time and could determine priorities is very doubtful.

To Dubovets, who was then in euphoria, “It seemed that Belarus, for most of its history, was stale and as non-Belarusian as the BSSR”.

But in Belarus, at first, she came to the throne "the highest dzyarzhauna asoba"- Shushkevich. In parliament, either Poznyak and his comrades, or Lukashenko were raging.

What line Dubovets followed then is not very clear, because he was not in the public eye and only emerged now - with discussions about Poznyak’s mistakes.

Further, he asks why everything didn’t go the same way as in Estonia, why we are not where Estonia is, and not like Estonia with its higher standard of living than in the post-Soviet space.

Let's not argue with Dubovets. He either does not understand, or deliberately does not want to understand, the difference in mentalities, the incomparability of production capacities and the scale of production relationships that characterize the economies of our countries.

He does not think about current information about how many people left the Baltic republics for the West in comparison with Belarus.

He is not interested in the state of the real sector of the economy and what the prospects are economic development Estonia, etc.

For him, Estonia is paradise, because “Didn’t people hate the good and bad Estonians there? And where did the democrats recognize the Popular Front? And why did they set a course for independence - NATO - Europe?

The question is, was it different for us in the early 90s?

Was our BPF headed by the Partygenosse? Didn’t US President Clinton come to us and give us a bench in Kurapaty?

After all, can a sane politician really believe that the path to "independence" lies through NATO membership?

In his rantings, Dubovets, of course, could not ignore "Mounaga torture."

80 percent of communists, Soviet generals, even Yankovsky from the Russian Theater voted for his language, but it was his fault that not everyone spoke on it "theatricalized radicalism" - “He is an intellect who developed that tiny hellishness of Belarus, which was taken away during the war. The parallel with Estonia was wrong.”

It’s hard to even call it stupidity. After all, the impulse of Belarusians for change at that time was not due to an insatiable thirst to use the Belarusian language, but to the distrust of the authorities sown among the people, Chernobyl fears and the infantilism of those who stood at the helm of the young republic.

Further, Dubovets claims that the split into the svyadomy and the unsvyadomy did not occur immediately after the formation of the Belarusian Popular Front, but after the election of the Supreme Council of the 12th convocation. And the reason for this is Poznyak.

He writes: “At the same time, the “elite” disappeared - the menavita pavodle gatay prikmety - svyadomyh, gata zanyts, molded for others, maceros, lich that “Estonians”, who rose above the old Belarusians.”

We've arrived.

After all, everyone remembers that this so-called “elite” began to emerge when it ran from one room to another under the name "Talaka."

She, the “elite,” gained breath when the sons of party workers realized that in the changed conditions the chance to rise to the level of power of their fathers presented itself only on the wave of national radicalism, and not obedience.

After all, even then life posed the question bluntly: either - or. Maneuvering was not welcomed, since everyone was tired of it during perestroika times.

Further, Dubovets confirms the inertia of his own thinking:

“I saved 25 years, and maybe even more, as long as we know that Belarusians are different, because all the trees and oak trees are different.”

It turns out that the situation now is not the same as before. There was a click: harmony reigned in society and "pamyarkoўnasts". (“Facebook” doesn’t count).

But this appearance of reconciliation is not without reason. This is a run-up to kick Poznyak and his entourage again:

“And what do you say - how are the people pagodzitsa na getki padzel, that we are Belarusians, but are there more Belarusian Belarusians? It is clear that “great Belarusians” will have abstract meetings on their side.”

Lukashenko is left too. It turns out he “I took the language out of the city” because she “became an admonisher of my family”, and Belarusians are suckers “I felt satisfied with the hell of it, to show the “big Belarusians” Kuzkin’s mother.

The schools themselves are rightly de-Belarusized.”

Well, just like Emelyushka: “The sleigh rides, it rides on its own, it rides on its own without a horse.”

And this nationwide revolt, born of the radicalization of the Svyadomy, led to the fall of the Belarusian Popular Front as a powerful mass movement and contributed to “We are installing an authoritative madele of ўlady, because the “unstable” people are autamatychna subjects of the palace, and the “elite” is a stratsila subject, closed on itself.”

Dubovets never clarified what the subjectivity of the people in politics means and who prevented the “elite” from losing it, each time remembering his beloved Estonia.

In rare moments of enlightenment, he speaks the absolute truth:

“...every Estonian will tell you who Lukashenka is, but only the hellish people of Belarus can guess who the President of Estonia is.”

And then he gets nostalgic:

“... some people think so myself - all of us, at the heart of all Belarusians, are hidden from all Belarusians, we cry out to them and to ourselves, to the whole people.”

Let us take a moment and imagine what the result would have been if Lenin and his entourage had "maryli" or “clicked to yourself” in 1917?

The Bolsheviks were not infantile intellectuals. They were armed modern theory, strategy and tactics of thoughtful actions. They persistently, competently and purposefully carried out daily work among workers and soldiers and were successful.

Revolutions in the minds of people are not made through incantations and humiliation of the current government alone. And the aggravation national issues in multinational republics is always fraught with carnage. You don't have to look far for examples.

Thank God, Zenon Poznyak and the revolutionaries of the first wave, willy-nilly, were brought up in a decent society. At that time they were not itching to unleash fratricidal conflicts on very unstable national and linguistic grounds.

There was controversy, ballpoint pens were broken, but not spears.

And here Dubovets is openly disingenuous, declaring that “atrad musіў bazavazza na demakratychnyh padstav. Not at all on the canned and radical ones, which instead of the agricultural sector were used, on the contrary, by the loud elite and the desperate cleanliness. What's wrong and you're sick."

After all, we remember very well: the entire opposition was not at all engaged in a detailed elaboration of the strategy for returning the country’s economy to a stable position, but instead struck in search of the future in the past on the basis of nationalist sentiments alien to people.

Surely the same Dubovets tore his shirt by "The language and the weakened hell of Balshevism" instead of agitation for national consensus and the translation of public debate into the mainstream of economic problems and ways to solve them.

It served as an excuse for our national humanitarians, who knew nothing about economics. “Road to Europe.” It was as if they were impatiently waiting for us there and there was no life for them without us.

At the end of his story, Dubovets sincerely admits his thoughtlessness:

“In this case, if we understand this, the scale of the bastards and the herds of the “families of Belarus” have been eliminated - other countries have different countries, different languages.”

However, even today his reasoning has not received at least any replenishment with new ideas and does not go beyond “mounaga torture.”

He states that "znіkla self-proclaimed“elite of the great Belarusian Belarusians”, svyadomyh,” but, like a woodpecker, he remains faithful to the previous standard, with which he pins timid hopes: “...how can we understand ourselves with the Estonians, and why is this magical misery irrevocable?”

And Dubovets’s confession without admitting his own mistakes naturally caused a resonance in the opposition community.

It should be noted that many of the arguments of the discussion participants seem quite reasonable.

For example, someone under the nickname “Sviadomy”, talking about Poznyak, states:

“Nya could in 1994 Metsko Yong Yong Padtrymyku at gramadism ... I would have a bang Gamsakhurdya from Gruziy ... Khatsya, he would be healthy, Sfafarmavatz udolnaya Vertykal I Garyzantal, in Adroznnin, Hell Shushkevich.”

“...the size of the active Rukhaitsa has grown “everything, on the right is broken, the pallet system has been published - it is necessary to think about it”, the green business has abandoned, the svyadomy - right from the broad faction parliamentarians' pockets (there were only members of the Belarusian Popular Front) , we began to explore our own interests: who is the pasada, who is the landowner in the adpachynku zone, who is given away to their deeds for dzyarzhainy kosht, who is married to Lithuania, who lives in the old Belarus "Kay steel."

“Mae Ratsyu” and someone “Benedzikt”:

“Suchu for obmerkavannem i vyshavany zauvazhyts - not abmyarkovaetstsa extremely important problem (it seems that menavіta yana “motivated” Dubautz (and not only Iago) on the written word of the article).

Prychyna ў offensive - agulnavido, that the scandal with the adventure - facts ab uncollected, falsified signatures "Govpravda" and how other "lidars" plow all these dzeyachov in your mind grooves.

It is true that Z. Paznyak ab dzeynastsi pseudapazitsynykh struktury".

What can I say? Everything is correct. That's how it is.

We must pay tribute to Poznyak. Despite all his recent miscalculations, he is the only significant figure who does not compromise on principles and does not wag his tail in front of those who call the tune.

If his nervous system had not resonated with the Ukrainian events, which in no way correspond to his own ideas about good and evil, he could have become not a foreign leader of alternative thinking, but a real Belarusian politician who has no need to fight with windmills communism - they are already in the past.

In conclusion, I wanted to write something smart, but one expression from Dubovets brought a smile and put me off the desire to pound water in a mortar:

“...all the trees in the oak tree are rosy, only the pine needles are hellishly timid. And the very sign is like this - an oak, oaks for other oaks - not the same as in nature.”

It seems that Dubovets told the truth. But, as you know, in every process there are exceptions.

Today “Oakest for other oaks” still there.

Author Zhuravlev Andrey Yurievich

Further - more