(Analysis of the episode)" (Hero of Our Time). Essay “The last meeting of Pechorin and Maxim Maksimych. (Analysis of the episode)" (Hero of Our Time) Waiting to meet Maxim Maksimych

Lermontov's novel “A Hero of Our Time” is an amazing and interesting work. The composition of the novel itself is unusual. Firstly, the work consists of stories, which in itself is extraordinary. Secondly, they are not arranged chronologically, as is traditionally customary. All stories are divided into two parts: a story about Pechorin’s life through the eyes of stranger(“Bela”, “Maxim Maksimych”, “Preface to Pechorin’s Journal”) and the diary of Pechorin himself, revealing his inner life (“Taman”, “Princess Mary”, “Fatalist”). This principle was not chosen by the author by chance. It contributes to the most profound, complete and psychologically subtle analysis of the hero.

There is no single plot in the work. Each story has its own characters and situations. They are connected only by the figure of the main character - Grigory Alexandrovich Pechorin. Either we see him during his service in the Caucasus, then he finds himself in the provincial town of Taman, then he is relaxing in Pyatigorsk on mineral waters. Everywhere the hero creates an extreme situation, sometimes threatening his life. Pechorin cannot live an ordinary life; he needs situations that reveal his enormous abilities.

The story “Maksim Maksimych” describes the finale of the events depicted in “A Hero of Our Time.” For the last time, the figure of the restless hero, who cannot find refuge for himself, is shown. Of particular significance in this story is the contrast between Pechorin and Maxim Maksimych. There is no detailed action here. This story is structured as a road episode.

Maxim Maksimych and the narrator learn that Pechorin’s carriage has arrived in the courtyard of their hotel. The elderly staff captain is very excited about this and is eager to see his old comrade. He is sure that as soon as Pechorin finds out who is waiting for him, he will immediately come running and will be very glad to meet him. Maxim Maksimych even runs out of the gate to meet him. But Pechorin is in no hurry to return from visiting. He appears only the next day to immediately leave for Persia. That's the plot of this episode. But with the help of such simple events, the author reveals the characters of his heroes.



Pechorin appears after various life events described in the rest of the novel. Left behind are St. Petersburg, Pyatigorsk, Taman, and the Caucasus. The reader has already learned who Pechorin is, but he was shown through the eyes of Maxim Maksimych. Now we see the hero through the eyes of the narrator. Subtle observation of Grigory Alexandrovich's appearance allows us to sketch his inner portrait. There are several features in Pechorin's character, conveyed through his portrait. The author emphasizes through his appearance the complexity and inconsistency of Pechorin’s personality. His “strong build” and “broad shoulders” contradict the “something childish” in his smile, the “feminine tenderness” of his skin, the carelessness and laziness in his gait.
The peculiarity of Pechorin’s gait was also that “he did not wave his arms.” The author notes that this is “a sure sign of a secretive character.” Lermontov pays attention to conveying the fatigue of life of his hero: “When he sat down on the bench, his straight waist bent, as if he did not have a single bone in his back; the position of his whole body depicted some kind of nervous weakness...” Speaking about the eyes, the mirror of the soul of every person, the author notes: “... they did not laugh when he laughed!... This is a sign of either an evil disposition or deep constant sadness.”
Before us is a young man, tired of life, with a bright personality and a complex inner world.

In contrast to him, Maxim Maksimych is given. This open man, completely turned towards his fellow man. The old staff captain is faithful to his past friendship with Pechorin with all his heart. Having learned that Grigory Alexandrovich had finally appeared in the hotel courtyard, he dropped all his business and ran towards his old comrade: “A few minutes later he was already near us; he could hardly breathe; sweat rolled from his face like hail; wet tufts of gray hair... stuck to his forehead; his knees trembled..."
Seeing his long-awaited friend, Maxim Maksimych wanted to throw himself on his neck, but Pechorin only extended his hand in a friendly manner. And this is not surprising, because he did not consider the staff captain his friend or comrade. For Pechorin, this was just another person with whom fate brought him together for a while, and nothing more.
We can say that Maxim Maksimych was an accidental witness to his next spiritual drama. During a brief conversation, the staff captain reminds Pechorin about Bel. It becomes clear that the young man would not want to remember this: “Pechorin turned a little pale and turned away.” This is another heavy burden on his soul that he would not like to show. Therefore, he speaks of the young Circassian woman, “yawning forcibly.”
This person does not allow anyone to penetrate his soul, to understand what feelings he experiences. Pechorin is so withdrawn into himself that he loses the ability to feel at least briefly the excitement, anxieties, and demands of the soul of another person. He does not want to give Maxim Maksimych a single extra minute, which greatly offends the old man. And the frowning staff captain says to Pechorin: “That’s not how I thought I’d meet you...”. Here, friendly feelings awaken in the hero for a second, and he hugs Maxim Maksimych. And he immediately leaves, making it clear to the staff captain that they are unlikely to ever meet again. Maxim Maksimych is offended in his best feelings.

Thanks to this episode and the comparison with the elderly staff captain, one can see the figure of Pechorin more clearly. He cannot think about other people: Pechorin is too closed for this and concentrated on himself. The kindness and sincere friendly feelings of Maxim Maksimych do not evoke any response in him. The reader sees that over the past time Pechorin has finally fallen ill with incurable boredom and an indifferent attitude not only towards others, but also towards his fate. Therefore, after the episode of the last meeting, the author had no choice but to “kill” his hero.

Text based on the novel by M.Yu. Lermontov Hero of Our Time

Why did Pechorin treat Maxim Maksimych so coldly during their last meeting?

The chapter “Maksim Maksimych” describes a scene when at a crossroads, in Vladikavkaz, on the square near the hotel, an army captain and a man from a chosen environment meet, main character novel Pechorin.

Maxim Maksimych, by definition of critic V.G. Belinsky - one of the best folk characters. He has kindness, sincerity and a bright faith in friendship between people.

And therefore, he, being a simple-minded man, is confident that the aristocrat Pechorin will “come running” when he learns that Maxim Maksimych, his former comrade in arms, a modest, low-ranking officer, is staying at a local hotel.

But Pechorin coldly greets Maxim Maksimych, citing the fact that each of them has “their own path.”

The old man is upset, if not killed, by Pechorin’s behavior. He is sincerely convinced that the reason is in himself, in the old man who is “not rich, not an official,” and he cannot remain “on an equal footing” with the brilliant St. Petersburger.

But there are other reasons for Pechorin’s coldness. The staff captain is a witness and even a participant in the story of the seduction of Bela, a mountain girl, by the capital's aristocrat. He knew the story of the death of her family, and was present at the bedside of the dying Bela.

Externally romantic story with Bela there is a story of Pechorin’s crime, which led to the destruction of family foundations, the death of both the family itself and all its members. If Maxim Maksimych had “kicked things into gear,” then his young friend, selfish and frivolous, would not have escaped severe punishment. That’s why Pechorin is also cold towards his former comrade in arms: who wants to reopen old wounds?

Psychologism in the behavior of the heroes is seen in the throwings of the kind Maxim Maksimych, who is impatiently waiting for Grigory Alexandrovich, and in the careless attitude of the main character towards his comrade in arms from previous years. However, as a sensitive person, Pechorin understands the reason for the old man’s offense and in his own way tries to justify himself and reassure his interlocutor.

Searched here:

  • Why did Pechorin greet Maxim Maksimych so coldly?
  • why Pechorin behaves coldly towards Maxim Maksimych
  • why Pechorin coldly greeted Maxim Maksimych

Essay “The last meeting of Pechorin and Maxim Maksimych. (Analysis of the episode)" (Hero of Our Time)

In the chapter “Maksim Maksimych” M. Yu. Lermontov shows Pechorin
on the eve of his departure to Persia. Chronologically this chapter
is the last: from the preface to Pechorin’s magazine we learn
that, returning from Persia, Pechorin died. Lermontov violates
chronological order parts to reveal deeper and brighter
Pechorin's character. In the chapter “Maksim Maksimych” we see how
became Pechorin towards the end of his short life. The main character is depicted
indifferent, passive, having lost interest in life. He
doesn’t want to pretend and involuntarily offends his old one with his indifference
friend Maxim Maksimych.
Five years earlier, Pechorin served in a fortress in the Caucasus
under the leadership of Maxim Maksimych. The old staff captain believes
that since then they have become “bosom friends.” Besides heroes
connects not only the service, but also sad story Bela. Having learned
that Pechorin is also passing through Vladikavkaz, Maxim
Maksimych asks the footman to inform the master about an old friend who is waiting
at the hotel. The staff captain is confident that Pechorin will hurry
meet him. Maxim Maksimych seemed to have forgotten that he himself
spoke of Pechorin as “ strange man" While still in service
in the fortress, a young officer surprised Maxim Maksimych with a complaint
to mortal boredom, early disappointment in life, selfish
behavior in relations with Bela. Maxim Maksimych in vain
waits for Pechorin in front of the hotel until late in the evening. Headquarters
the captain is upset, he doesn’t understand why the “sidekick” like him
believes that his friend did not immediately come running to meet him. Lermontov
sympathetically describes the simple-minded Maxim Maksimych,
however, he is little surprised at Pechorin’s absence: the staff captain himself
described his former colleague as a complete egoist.
In the morning, Maxim Maksimych is forced to leave on official business.
Soon Pechorin appears in the hotel courtyard and, without asking anyone,
about the staff captain, who had been waiting for him for so long, orders
pack the stroller. The author draws a portrait of the main character and shares
assumptions about his character. In Pechorin immediately
a secular and rich man is visible, an aristocrat endowed with noble
appearance and physical strength. His movements emphasize
some kind of relaxation, laziness, carelessness. Especially
The author remembers Pechorin’s “insightful and heavy” look,
who "might seem impudent if he were not so indifferent
calm."
Maxim Maksimych barely manages to catch his old friend. How
it turns out later that for the first time he “left the work of the service for his own
needs." The staff captain runs to the hotel, he is out of breath
and cannot speak at first, but Pechorin turns
to him with routine politeness. Maxim Maksimych is ready to “throw
on Pechorin’s neck,” but sees a “rather coldly” outstretched hand.
Lermontov builds a description of the short meeting of the heroes using the technique of contrast.
Maxim Maksimych expresses sincere joy from
meeting with a friend, and Pechorin speaks to him calmly, indifferently,
even reluctantly. Maxim Maksimych’s speech is full of abrupt exclamations,
caused by running and excitement: “And... you?... and you?... how many
years... how many days... but where is it?..." Pechorin gets off with nothing
Not meaningful phrases. All he can say about himself is that he is going
“to Persia - and further...”, and all five years he was “bored.” True, when mentioned
about Bad Pechorin turns pale, turns away and forcibly
yawns. Maxim Maksimych touched upon a sore subject for Pechorin.
Despite the obvious apathy, Pechorin is still able to worry about
memories of the past, but he tries to avoid it. Maxim
Maksimych’s very appearance brings back difficult memories.
Perhaps this partly explains Pechorin’s reluctance
stay and have lunch with a former colleague. When Pechorin
Says goodbye: “Thank you for not forgetting”, Maxim Maksimych
cannot contain his resentment: “Forget! - he grumbled, - I
I haven’t forgotten anything... Well, God be with you!..." Pechorin feels awkward
because he upset the old man. He hugs him friendly
and remarks: “...am I really not the same?” Pechorin’s remark is correct:
he never called himself a friend of Maxim Maksimych, as,
indeed, any other person; has always been indifferent
to those around him and did not hide it.
Maxim Maksimych retained his childhood faith in man in his years,
and Pechorin casually destroys it. It can be seen that the main character is driving
to Persia to have some fun. “...Perhaps I’ll die somewhere
on the road! - Pechorin prophetically declares during the service
in the fortress. He is indifferent to his own diaries,
remaining with the staff captain, although he had recently written down in them
innermost thoughts and desires. In the following parts of the novel Lermontov
uses diary form to look deeper
hero's soul. In "Maxim Maksimych" we can only guess
about the reasons for Pechorin’s collapse in life, but this collapse is obvious.
And the old staff captain is worried not only because of indifference
former friend. Maxim Maksimych regrets that he is so smart
and a strong man did not find himself in life: “Oh, it’s true, it’s a pity that he
it will end badly... and it can’t be otherwise!

Concept.

Lesson, dedicated to analysis the second part of the novel, the central task is put forward by the definition reasons for the alienation of the “common man” Maxim Maksimych and Pechorin. A situation emphasizing Maxim Maksimych’s impatient anticipation of a meeting with Pechorin, accuses the hero in advance, and the students, as a rule, speak with indignation about his cruelty and coldness towards the devoted staff captain. Let's try with compositional analysis and expressive reading of the dialogue between Pechorin and Maxim Maksimych to overcome the one-sidedness of the reader's assessment. The students are concerned with the question: why didn’t Pechorin stay with Maxim Maksimych? After all, he was in no hurry and, only after learning that Maxim Maksimych wanted to continue the conversation, he hastily got ready for the road.

In order to imagine why Pechorin left, we pay attention to the meeting of Maxim Maksimych with the officer-narrator. After all, in this short story there are not one, but two meetings. The first of them opens differently than the second. There is nothing like Pechorin’s coldness in the officer: “We met like old friends.” However, the result of this meeting is comical and sad at the same time: “... I must admit that without him I would have had to remain on dry eating... We were silent. What did we have to talk about? He already told me everything that was interesting about himself, but I had nothing to tell.”

The generally significant content of the staff captain’s life comes down to his relationship with Pechorin (perhaps involuntarily feeling this, that’s why Maxim Maksimych values ​​them so much). The narrator, although his suitcase is full of travel notes, does not tell the staff captain about them, apparently not hoping for understanding. So, it’s not about the first hug, which Pechorin didn’t start with (he ended the conversation by hugging Maxim Maksimych in a friendly manner). It's a matter of division common man"and the noble intellectual, in that tragic abyss, which Lermontov recognizes as one of the "caustic truths."

How does Maxim Maksimych explain Pechorin’s reluctance to stay? Does the author agree with him?

We re-read the scene of Pechorin’s meeting with Maxim Maksimych and compose a “score of feelings” for their dialogue. Did Pechorin want to offend Maxim Maksimych? Is he indifferent to the fate and grief of the staff captain? Pechorin's portrait testifies to his fatigue and coldness. It was as if the feelings had left his face, leaving their traces on it and the impression of unspent strength. Pechorin is indifferent to his fate, to his past. To Maxim Maksimych’s question about what to do with the “papers”, Pechorin’s journal, he answers: “Whatever you want!” But even in this state of alienation from everything and from himself, Pechorin tries to soften his coldness "a friendly smile" and kind words: “I’m so glad, dear Maxim Maksimych! Well, how are you doing?” Pechorin’s refusal to stay is given in an impersonal form, as if it is not his will, but something more powerful that dictates this decision to him: “I have to go,” was the answer.” To the passionate questions of Maxim Maksimych (“Well! Retired?.. how?.. what did you do?”) Pechorin answered, “smiling,” in monosyllables: “I missed you!”

This smile, directly opposite to the meaning of the words, is often perceived by students as a mockery of the staff captain. But Pechorin is more likely to be ironic at himself, at the hopelessness of his situation, when all attempts to invade life end in bitter results. Back in “Bel” the author warned us that today those who are truly bored the most are trying to hide this misfortune as a vice.” For For Maxim Maksimych, everything that happened was sweet, for Pechorin it was painful.: “Do you remember our life in the fortress?.. A glorious country for hunting!.. After all, you were a passionate hunter to shoot... And Bela?..” Pechorin turned slightly pale and turned away...

· Yes, I remember! - he said, almost immediately yawning forcefully..."

The staff captain does not notice the involuntary irony of his words: "passionate hunter to shoot" Pechorin "shot" Bela (after all, his pursuit and shot prompted Kazbich to grab a knife). And Pechorin, it seems indifferent to everything in the world, he cannot calmly endure this reproach that he has not forgiven himself, just as he cannot calmly, epically remember the story with Bela in a conversation over pheasant and Kakhetian with Maxim Maksimych. Not hoping for Maxim Maksimych’s understanding, avoiding pain, Pechorin refuses to continue the meeting and, as best he can, tries to soften his refusal: “Really, I have nothing to tell, dear Maxim Maksimych... However, goodbye, I have to go... I’m in a hurry... Thank you for not forgetting... - he added, taking him by the hand,” and, seeing the old man’s annoyance, he added: “Well, that’s enough, that’s enough!” - said Pechorin, hugging him in a friendly manner - am I really not the same?.. What to do?.. to each his own way.

Pechorin does not condemn the staff captain for being unable to understand him, does not blame anyone for his loneliness, but bitterly admits that they have different roads. He knows that a meeting with Maxim Maksimych will not dispel his boredom, and will only intensify his bitterness, and therefore avoids vain explanations. Once upon a time, Pechorin tried to open himself (confession in “Bel”), understand the position of the staff captain (conversation at the end of “Fatalist”) and behaved without any arrogance.

“Returning to the fortress, I told Maxim Maksimych everything that happened to me and what I witnessed, and wanted to know his opinion about predestination. At first he did not understand this word, but I explained it as best I could, and then he said, shaking his head significantly: “Yes! Of course, sir - this is a rather tricky thing! However, these Asian triggers often misfire if they are poorly lubricated, or if you press your finger firmly with dissatisfaction...” And then the staff captain willingly discusses the qualities of the Circassian weapons. In the end, Maxim Maksimych discovers that fatalism is characteristic of him: “Yes, it’s a pity for the poor fellow... The devil pulled him to talk to a drunk at night! However, apparently, it was written in his family!” I couldn’t get anything else out of him: he doesn’t like metaphysical debates at all.”

The kindness of Maxim Maksimych is powerless because it is devoid of understanding general meaning things. And therefore the staff captain is submissive to the circumstances, while Pechorin is trying to overcome them. For Lermontov, the confrontation between these heroes is so important that he ends the novel with a dialogue between Pechorin and the staff captain.. The short story “Maksim Maksimych” ends even more bitterly. In his offense, the staff captain is ready to confuse Pechorin with his proud lackey. Not understanding Pechorin, Maxim Maksimych accuses him of class arrogance: “What does he need in me? I’m not rich, I’m not an official, and I’m not his age at all... Look, what a dandy he has become, how he visited St. Petersburg again...”The staff captain's wounded pride pushes him to revenge. Having just considered himself a friend of Pechorin, Maxim Maksimych calls him “a flighty man,” “with contempt,” throws his notebooks to the ground, ready to expose Pechorin to everyone: “at least print it in the newspapers!” What do I care!.. What, am I some kind of friend or relative?”

The change in Maxim Maksimych is so striking that it seems unthinkable or prompted by momentary anger. But the author will not allow us to be mistaken. Good turned to evil, and this is not a moment, but the final result of the life of the staff captain: “We said goodbye rather dryly. Good Maxim became a stubborn, grumpy staff captain! And why? Because Pechorin, absent-minded or for another reason (the author revealed it to us in the remarks to the dialogue - V.-M.) extended his hand to him when he wanted to throw himself on his neck! It’s sad to see when a young man loses his best hopes and dreams... although there is hope that he will replace old misconceptions with new ones... But how to replace them in the years of Maxim Maksimych? Involuntarily, the heart will harden and the soul will close... I left alone.”The divergence between the “common man”, in whom there is a heart, but there is no understanding of people of another circle, the general circumstances of life, and the “hero of the time”, and with him the author of the novel, turned out to be inevitable.

With all the spiritual merits of Maxim Maksimych, he is not able to resist evil either in the private, human, or in the general, social sense.

At home, we give the students a plan to answer the topic “Pechorin and Maxim Maksimych” and, after reading the textbook article under the same title, think about whether they agree with all its provisions, justifying their point of view with the text of the novel.

Retelling and analysis of the story “Maksim Maksimych” or reading by role. Questions you can use:

1) What is your impression of what you read?

2) What are the features of Pechorin’s portrait? How does it differ from the portrait given by Maxim Maksimych in the story “Bela”?

3) What is the role of the narrator in the story?

4) How is Lermontov’s ideological plan manifested?

5) Analyze the episode of Pechorin’s meeting with the staff captain. Can Pechorin and Maxim Maksimych be called friends?

6) How do you explain Pechorin’s coldness? Why didn't he stay to dine with the staff captain?

7) What character traits of Pechorin were revealed in the last meeting with Maxim Maksimych?

8) Which of the heroes do you sympathize with?

9) What do you think their meeting should be like?

10) What is the place and significance of the story “Maksim Maksimych” in the novel?

(Compositional role The story “Maksim Maksimych” is great. She is like a connecting link between “Bela” and “Pechorin’s Journal”. It explains how the magazine came to the author, a visiting officer.

The plot of the story is also simple. But the meeting between Pechorin and Maxim Maksimych is sad. The coldness, indifference and selfishness of the main character have increased. Travel is the last attempt to somehow fill your life with something useful, new experiences.)

The most important means Pechorin's characteristics in this story are psychological portrait(features of appearance, reflection of complex emotional experiences in it, psychologism of the portrait).

Homework.

1. The story “Taman”. Reading, retelling the plot. What is the meaning of Pechorin’s clash with the smugglers?

2. Analysis of the episodes “The Boat Scene” and “Yanko’s Farewell to the Blind Boy.” What new did you learn about the main character?

3. Observations on the composition “Tamani”, description of nature, speech of the characters.

The chapter “Maxim Maksimych” of M. Yu. Lermontov’s novel “Hero of Our Time” depicts the last meeting of G. A. Pechorin with staff captain Maxim Maksimych five years after they met. Despite the fact that the old man had been waiting impatiently for his long-time friend for a long time, and when he arrived, he ran towards him “as best he could,” Pechorin responded to this with a cold smile and a simple polite phrase. Stunned, “with tears in his eyes,” the old man did not know what to say. At that moment he was a pitiful sight: “barely

could breathe; sweat rolled from his face like a hail. his knees trembled.” Having calmed down slightly, Maxim Maksimych began to remember life in the fortress, hunting, Bela. After which Pechorin “turned a little pale and turned away.”

This scene has caused and continues to cause numerous controversies among both critics and readers. Why did G. A. Pechorin do this to the poor old officer? What motivated his action? Who is in front of us at that moment: an egoist or an unhappy person, a ruthless, rude creature or a tactful aristocrat defending himself from new suffering?!

I think that Pechorin in this scene is an unhappy man who was once again reminded of his bitter experience

past. He knows Maxim Maksimych very well, imagines the questions that he will begin to ask, and the memories that he will begin to share. That's why he avoids meeting with his old colleague. Alas! It was not possible to avoid it. And what Lermontov’s hero foresaw happened happened. Maxim Maksimych, forgetting about tact and not thinking about his friend’s feelings, immediately started talking about Bela, the very girl whose death causes Pechorin not only sadness, but also the deepest feeling of guilt. Figuratively speaking, the best friend in terms of strength, from the first minute of the meeting, begins to “pour salt” into Pechorin’s spiritual wound. And what remains for the hero? To be rude to an old man? Cut it off abruptly? No! Leave immediately! Interrupt this unexpected and unpleasant meeting for him.

That is why G. A. Pechorin so quickly breaks up with his old friend.


Other works on this topic:

  1. In the second story of Mikhail Yuryevich Lermontov’s novel “A Hero of Our Time” “Maxim Maksimych”, Pechorin meets with his old comrade in arms in front of the eyes of the main narrator -...
  2. Text based on the novel by M.Yu. Lermontov Hero of Our Time Why did Pechorin treat Maxim Maksimych so coldly during their last meeting? The chapter “Maksim Maksimych” describes...
  3. Lermontov’s novel “Hero of Our Time” is an amazing and interesting work. The composition of the novel itself is unusual. Firstly, the work consists of stories, which in itself is extraordinary....
  4. 1. Pechorin and his entourage. Revealing the character of the hero. 2. Pechorin and Maxim Maksimych. 3. Pechorin and Grushnitsky. 4. Werner's role in the story. Grigory Alexandrovich Pechorin,...
  5. Last meeting Pechorin and Maxim Maksimych When you open Lermontov’s novel “A Hero of Our Time,” you forget that it was written more than a hundred years ago. The writer introduces us to...
  6. M. Yu. Lermontov’s novel “Hero of Our Time” is one of the first Russian psychological novels. Through the image of the main character of the novel, Grigory Alexandrovich Pechorin, the author conveys the main...
  7. Lermontov’s novel “Hero of Our Time” reflects the conflict of a person of a new moral level with representatives of a bygone era. The novel consists of several parts, not arranged chronologically...
  8. If A. S. Pushkin is considered to be the creator of the first realistic poetic novel about modernity, then, in my opinion, Lermontov is the author of the first socio-psychological novel in prose....